Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I called my GP surgery and offered to jump in car and turn up at no notice if they got no shows and was told 'thats simply not happening' When I pointed out that the BBC had raised the issue I was quite bruskly interrupted (unusual at my surgery) and told the media is spouting rubbish which is helping no-one.   I do know that hospital/vaccination center staff are/have been given doses from failed attendances. presumably managed locally   We need to understand that patients can call again, but the vaccination doses are and will remain for some time limited and waste (including relying on others turning up after one failure to turn up) is to be avoided at all costs   There is also the issue of managing the second dose (errr) for those who are given one out of sequence. Let alone any questions regarding that being 'approved'     Personally I would have been happy getting one dose early whatever happened later.  
    • A cross-party group of 70 MPs are pushing for buy-now-pay-later firms to be regulated within three months View the full article
    • Slightly off topic , just a quick question    another debt with Capquest - been ignoring for ages as refuses to supply signed docs and statement of account    finally supplied a list of transaction they say is from original creditor , but just an excel list of 29 transactions , no title , no account number ,  no headings   literally just a list of numbers on a Capquest paper - with Capquest small print in the footer .   obviously , I can see there is nothing to tie this list of numbers to me -    im looking for a good paragraph to send back    like *   Thanks for a list of numbers you have typed with no references , titles, account numbers or anything to show this is an original creditors statement , this is not my statement , and has not been provided by the creditor on creditor paperwork I j the format of a statement -  please provide as required the original statement as required by ..........     can you help ?
    • You arranged this delivery with P2G and I'm assuming that they used Hermes. This correct?   Were the hampers correctly declared? Was the value of the hampers correctly declared? –  You don't tell us what the value of these hampers was. Please could you tell us what each one was and the total.   Did you take out any of their so-called insurance?   In your first post you say that you are "… not really out-of-pocket." I take this to be a typo ??   Presumably you have sent hampers using the same companies before?   As suggested by my site team colleague above, please can you read thoroughly around the various Hermes stories in this sub- forum and start understanding all the various principles and also the journey that these claims normally take – which means a letter of claim, a County Court action, mediation – and then generally speaking, a settlement.   It is highly likely that your claim will have to follow the same route and you need to be well prepared to understand the principles involved and the steps to take.   In addition to reading up on the various Hermes stories on this forum, you should also understand the steps involved in taking a small claim in the County Court.   You may as well start to familiarise yourself with this process because if you are running a small business and you are dealing with suppliers et cetera then no doubt you will end up having to use the County Court system again  and so you will be learning some very useful transferable skills.    
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Hoist/cohen claimform - ex EGG now barclaycard debt


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

so nothing to do with any extra mediation, its a std court hearing over the phone .

 

who are 'they' that said a magistrate please?

 

have you exchanged witness statements?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still strange.....a telephone hearing for what ? Its not the normal sequence of events...   the claim has still yet to be allocated. ...unless you have already received your Notice of allocation (N157) ?

 

You initially stated the telephone hearing was for June...then you disappeared for 5 months ...then you have a hearing this week for mediation which failed...now your having a telephone hearing in December.

 

I can only assume this is to question the Statute Barred element of the defence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was quite reluctant to discuss specifics for all to see..

.tried to discuss things privately..

 

.no witness statements exchanged from my side.

 

..they've sent letters and the original bumpf that looks like a bad copy of CCA,

but their solicitors noticed that Statute Barred element was an error on my part as still within 6 years.

 

I kept sending messages on the private thinking it was the public forum as they look the same..

.apologies for that.

 

Informal mediation was back in June over the phone.

No Court stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you sent PM msgs to someone on cag?

 

and you have hoists witness statement and exhibits?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you need to set aside they've not got judgement yet...

 

what date is your hearing and why didnt you send your witness statement by 14 days before the hearing date?

 

can we see their witness statement please!!

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still recoverable 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hearing is tomorrow by phone, I was visiting my son in Paris..have tickets to prove it so didn't get the documents until yesterday....

 

They sent e-mail PDF under name of solicitor rather than comppany...must have gone to spam....no paper version sent. Shall I send the pdf ?

 

I have all paper correspondence in order here...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

their WS should come from a solicitor, the fact you've been away is not an excuse for not filing your WS in time, nor for not receiving their WS.

 

we could have easily countered their WS in yours had you bothered to research things properly from day one and also noted you should never give nor allow the use of email addresses to the fleecers.

 

i'm not sure if you can phone the court now and delay the hearing to be able now to file a WS.

we rarely lose any hoist barclaycard claims if things are done to the tried and tested method in the 10's of like claims here already as their paperwork is always pants.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please use PDFmerge detailed in our upload guide

else we will be here all day downloading single page uploads

 

we need ALL the WS and the exhibits.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry what is WS can't find it in Abbreviations Post...trying to edit their bundle of files...

Edited by Gonadz
Can I send it privately as there are 110 pages ? Seems sensible to add so edited....
Link to post
Share on other sites

did you ring the court and ask for a delay?
 

ws ..witness statement ...all the documents you are uploading above are from it....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to Hoist/cohen claimform - ex EGG now barclaycard debt

there is no agreement there

just pages of T&C that can be downloaded from anywhere including this site or hoists filing cabinet.

for those to BE a compliant Agreement there must be an online signup box with a tick in it

there also needs to be your printed name

and 

the time and date 

and

the IP address of the PC used.

these are fatal to their claim

 

there is NO DEFAULT NOTICE, that is FATAL to their claim.

 

plenty of examples of a defendants (your) WS's here already with exactly the above problems re T&C's and DN.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My surname is spelt with one B instead of 2 on the Egg CCA that they sent a copy of...but address is correct.

Should I submit a late WS now ? How should I proceed tomorrow on the telephone ?

 

Edited by Gonadz
specify surname
Link to post
Share on other sites

immaterial. Neither of them are agreements merely pages of T&C.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

there is no agreement there

just pages of T&C that can be downloaded from anywhere including this site or hoists filing cabinet.

for those to BE a compliant Agreement there must be an online signup box with a tick in it

there also needs to be your printed name

and 

the time and date 

and

the IP address of the PC used.

these are fatal to their claim

 

there is NO DEFAULT NOTICE, that is FATAL to their claim.

 

plenty of examples of a defendants (your) WS's here already with exactly the above problems re T&C's and DN.

 

 

 

go find a ws in the legal successes forum for your same player s there are loads relating to WON - No default notice.

adapt it 

take it with you 3 copies.

1 judge

1 cohen

1 for you.

 

you could email the court and cohen.

but its really very late to do so...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

MY WORDS IN ITALICS

 

there is no agreement there

just pages of T&C that can be downloaded from anywhere including this site or hoists filing cabinet.

for those to BE a compliant Agreement there must be an online signup box with a tick in it -

 

No sign up Box & my name spelt wrong can I suggest it may be a forgery ? Date just says 4 2008 but  no IP address.

 

there also needs to be your printed name

and 

the time and date 

and

the IP address of the PC used.

these are fatal to their claim

 

there is NO DEFAULT NOTICE, that is FATAL to their claim.

 

Statement of Account which says COPY STATEMENT 100 times at top is not a DEFAULT NOTICE, would that Def Notice be from Barclay's ? I can't see one anywhere. Looking at Legal Successes to write Email now.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are several instances where Horst mentions BUYING the account and Coen 28/8 'Our client purchased this account'. Barclaycard use 'effective owners' 'assigned and transferred' Trying to patch togethjer a defence read all threads which were WON after using search bar - it's quite hard to find threads I found.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...