Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
    • Please post up their letter so we understand what they've asked. You need to cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • Hello,  I received the standard letter.  I don't understand No. 3: If this is in relation to a ticket irregularity, then if you were unable to produce a pass because you did not have it with you or if your pass was withdrawn because you were unable to produce a valid photocard to accompany it, please enclose a photocopy of the pass/photocard with your reply. Question: do i enclose my photocard? my partner's freedom pass was confiscated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome/coast financial


edwi69
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1532 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 551
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

HI THERE Kerry710

YES YOU NEED TO SEND A SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST AND SEND A 10 POUND POSTAL ORDER AND YOU WILL NEED TO DO A CCA AND SEND A 1 POUND POSTAL ORDER SEND THEM SEPERATELY AND MAKE SURE THEY ARE RECORDED DELIVERY AND DO NOT SIGN THEM THIS IS A BIG NO NO! I WILL PUT THE ADDRESS BELOW WHERE YOU NEED TO SEND THESE,THEY DONT GO TO YOUR LOCAL BRANCH.

THE TEMPLATE LETTERS ARE ON THE FORUM FOR THE SAR AND THE CCA.

HERE IS THE ADDRESS

 

Welcome Financial Services

Compliance

Mere Way

Ruddington Fields Business Park

Ruddington

Nottingham

ng11-6nz

 

regards edwi69

 

I realise this is an old thread but I sent an SAR without a signature, and they sent it back along with my postal order stating that without a signature it could not be processed. Any thoughts?

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

thats a load of rollocks all you need to do is initial the letter whatever you do dont sign anything for them because you will of given them what they wanted.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ed,

 

Thanks for the reply. I have read this entire thread 3 times now with great interest.

I am in the same boat as you with Welcome.

I am still in the begiining stages though.

 

I have received a letter stating ppi was mis-sold but the amounts I am not sure are correct.

I have yet to receive my SAR or CCA, but they still have time to respond so I wait.

 

Anyway it looks like you are winning the fight so well done!

Hopefully my thread wont have to reach 20+ pages before I get a result. :)

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI ALL

JUST IN CASE ANYONE DIDNT GET TO READ THIS,I HAVE ONLY JUST STUMBLED ON IT MYSELF 3 LINKS BELOW

 

 

BBC News - Welcome Finance claims taken over by FSCS

 

http://www.fscs.org.uk/news/2011/march/fscs-declares-welcome-financial-7pghpepm/index.html

 

 

Welcome Financial Services debt help, reviews, complaints and

 

 

 

REGARDS ED

Edited by edwi69
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all

Had a letter from incasso today about my secured welcome loan that has been in dispute for about 18 months due to non cca they are saying that they want paying.

Any advice would be helpfull

Regards edwi

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am pretty sure incasso are welcomes in house ahem legal side.

Simply refer them to the fact that the CCA 77/78 has not been comlied with remind them of data protection and remind them as the account is in dispute it can't be chased also remind them that as it is in dispute it is iliegal for Welcome to pass onto a DCA and remind them of their own legal obligations (FSA procedures) I would even make the threat to report them to the FSA.

 

Cheers PDB1980

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for butting in...

 

Is your account in dispute because they sent you a reconstituted copy, or because they didn't send you one at all?

 

If its because they sent you a recon, that does actually mean they HAVE complied with s.77/78 CCA.

Check out Carey v HSBC, its quite clear that a recon DOES comply with s.77/78.

 

If they didn't send you one at all... that would be different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

many thanks for your replys but i requested a true copy meaning a genuine due to things not adding up and the mis-selling of ppi to this date they have not released me a true copy so why are they asking for full payment within seven days or threatening legal action when surely the if it went to court the judge would want to see the original true copy and not the reconstituted one that you can add what you want to.

Any advice

regards edwi

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

They probably feel as though they have complied, as a recon copy does satisfy the request. A true copy can be a recon copy. What you will depend on is if and when they take you to court will they be abled to produce a signed copy.

 

As I see it you have a couple of options.

 

1. Do nothing and see if they take you to court, and hope they dont have a signed agreement

2. Send them a CPR 31.16 request for a copy of the signed agreement

 

I assume you are making token payments whilst this is in dispute?

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

they sent me a letter over a year ago saying they cannot produce a true signed copy over a year ago and i done the cpr 31.16 which they just ignored and no im not maiking any token payments whilst its in dispute and i also have a letter of admission to the mis-selling of the ppi.

Regards edwi

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's right. I recall reading that now. Sorry it has been awhile and many threads ago :)

 

Its been suggested to me, but a solicitor that in a case like this, that even though an account is in dispute, if there is a chance it will go to court, its a good idea to make a token payment.

This is done so as not to give the impression that you are avoiding or trying to avoid paying your debts.

The stance would be that whilst you agree the MAY be a debt owed, you are unwilling to fund the creditor.

You feel they owe YOU money, and until such time that dispute is resolved you will not enrich them.

 

I suppose its up to opinion, but a quid a month cant hurt, unless you are going for statute barring, but thats still 5 years away. Chances are someone will try to get it in front of a judge long before it becomes SB.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi all

Its been a little while now and the account is still in dispute with welcome due to non cca compliance and still havent had a true copy of my cca, we have had experto credite then incasso chase us for this and both times i sent them the return to welcome then all went quiet and today received the below letter from welcome.

http://i1009.photobucket.com/albums/af214/edwi69/13-10-2011172235.jpg

 

Any views would be apreciated

 

Kind regards edwi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I'm being a bit thick, but I think I'm missing something here. You say you asked for a true copy of the agreement, and Welcome gave you a reconstituted copy. S.77 CCA and Carey v HSBC both say that a reconstituted copy of the agreement IS a true copy of the agreement. So you got exactly what you asked for... How then can the breach of the CCA still be going on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi napoleon_dynamite

A true copy shows the correct amount borrowed and the correct interest rate not a make it up as you go along one and also not forgetting a true copy bears your signature therefore anyone can make a reconstituted one up and say you owe them what they want but with no signature its different.

regards edwi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Just spotted this article below

 

MacKenzie Hall hauled up over debt collection tactics

 

By Andrew Penman on April 21, 2009 11:35 AM in Debts and loans

 

Debt collection firm MacKenzie Hall has been told to clean up its act.

An investigation by The Office of Fair Trading found that "some of its business processes failed to meet satisfactory standards".

Now MacKenzie Hall, based in Kilmarnock, Ayrshire, must not pursue a debt where it has been notified in writing that there is reasonable cause to believe that the debt is in dispute.

Full details from the OFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Received a letter from Mackenzie today and i like the way welcome arent aware of any reason for non payment so i have sent them the return to welcome as account is in serious dispute would all agree and below is the link for the letter

Regards edwi

 

http://i1009.photobucket.com/albums/af214/edwi69/20-10-2011181334.jpg

 

Forgot to say that todays date is the 20th and the letter arrived as 12.55 and they wanted payment today the 20th by noon no date of postage on the envelpoe though

Edited by edwi69
missing info
Link to post
Share on other sites

As Mr Z has also said, a true copy IS a reconstituted copy. S.77 CCA and Carey v HSBC both say that a true copy is a RECONSTITUTED COPY, which can be TAKEN FROM OTHER SOURCES and doesn't need your signature, address, or any other personal information. You asked for a true copy, they sent you a true copy. You seem to admit receiving the recon, so in that way you admit to Welcome complying with their s.77 request. I say this because if that is your only argument against enforceing the agreement, its a pretty shaky one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what you are saying is yeah go ahead and pay them the extra 11k interest that you didnt sign for on your original cca and i signed for a secured loan and not a second morgage which they have registered with credit expert and just accept the reconstituted cca

regards ed

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...