Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
    • Peter McCormack says the huge investment by the twins will help Real Bedford build a new ground.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letting Agent Not Starting Deposit Return Process


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1517 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys. My tenancy ended at the end of January 29th. There was an independent company did the pre and post tenancy inspection. I believe i left the place in good decorative order and cleaned to a decent standard.

 

I recently got an email from the letting agent (who had changed hands) to deduct stupid amounts for minor wear and tear and because of some minor marks on the walls where i had filled and touched up the holes i made hanging small surround speakers. From what i know the DPS is supposed to handle the deductions or claims and not the letting agent. I was very rude to them and i accused them of ripping me off, i also asked that this be referred to the DPS to handle. Well its been a few days and i have heard nothing despite me sending a further email to ask for this to go to the DPS. What should i do next guys?

 

This is the email they sent.

 

Quote

 

Following on from the checkout at xxxxxxxxxxx I can confirm the following claims are being made from your deposit.

 

Deposit paid

£850

 

Deductions

£100- Painting to front reception room- 2 walls( see checkout report 7.3 Heavy black scuff mark to mid-level wall, right of fireplace. ;4 filled and painted small fixing holes to wall left of fireplace, and again to wall opposite fireplace)

£180 – Painting in rear reception room – 4 Walls(see checkout report 8.3 Moderate low level scuff marks to all walls)

£50- Painting in bedroom 2 – 1 wall( see checkout report 14.3 In excess of 10 additional large paint touch up marks to left wall towards window)

£25- Replace curtain track bedroom 3 (see checkout report 15.9 Curtain track is loose to wall fittings and laid to floor with curtain attached)

£25 – Replace damaged freezer drawer

Total deductions

£380

Amount to be refunded

£470

Please let me know if you are happy for me to proceed with processing the payment.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that they certainly aren't entitled to recover the costs of normal wear and tear.

When somebody rents out a property then they have to expect that it is going to be used and of course their asset will deteriorate as a result – and that is partly what the rent is for.

If there is damage which goes beyond that then that should certainly be paid for.

It seems to me that the holes in the wall definitely need to be addressed. Damaged freezer drawer. Curtain track. But if the scuffing on the walls is simply part of the ordinary usage of the property then that may well be considered wear and tear.

I'm afraid that being rude while they've got your money and you don't have it – is not necessarily the best approach.

Did you take photographs of the property as you left it? Did you take photographs of the property when you first moved in?

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add – I would suggest that the best strategy is to decide on which deductions you agree upon and then write to them and approve those deductions and ask them to pay those ever immediately and then put the others in dispute.

This will demonstrate goodwill and positive approach and also reduce the size of the dispute value which will be helpful later on

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. I dont have any pics of before and after. The independent inspection did though. 

 

As you say any scuffs on the wall are down to wear and tear. I did fill in the holes that i made on the walls, i dabbed them with the correct colour of paint to blend them in. The walls already had many patchy areas due to previous patched up areas. There is also a big nasty crack that goes from the ceiling to the top of the fireplace, that has always been there. So the living room is not exactly in excellent order to start with.

 

I fixed the freezer door before i left but i guess the superglue did not last, the inspection woman certainly did not notice it. They have picked up on this after the inspection and key hand over. I guess i cant deny that one.

 

The curtain track. I complained about it many months ago. The little cheapo clips keep on failing, its impossible to hang the rail up due to it's cheap and nasty design, i did try many times. I just left it as i did not use that room. I was sick to death of the amount of time i wasted due to repair men and electricians in and out my house, i was not going to waste more time because of a curtain rail.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Just to add – I would suggest that the best strategy is to decide on which deductions you agree upon and then write to them and approve those deductions and ask them to pay those ever immediately and then put the others in dispute.

This will demonstrate goodwill and positive approach and also reduce the size of the dispute value which will be helpful later on

 

Thanks for your reply. I thought they had to send it to the DPS to decide on. I did not think they were supposed to try and get me to agree on the claims before hand. I told them i dispute all their claims but they seem to be blanking me. I will write them another email regarding the freezer door and see if it makes any difference. 

 

Am i able to start the DPS process to get the ball rolling or is it only the letting agent that can do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that I don't know what the proper procedures are but although you filled the holes in the wall and painted them, it was obviously not good enough that they didn't notice it.

I'm afraid that I'm not competent to comment on the correct procedures which should be followed. Maybe somebody else will come along here and help. Also I can only advise you as to the principles of "wear and tear" as I understand them – but I haven't seen the marks that they are referring to. However it's not unknown for landlords to expect to be able to get an entire professional paint job at the expense of their ex-tenants.

You didn't take your own pictures going in and you didn't take your take own pictures going out – Big Fail.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 08/02/2020 at 09:28, BankFodder said:

I'm afraid that I don't know what the proper procedures are but although you filled the holes in the wall and painted them, it was obviously not good enough that they didn't notice it.

I'm afraid that I'm not competent to comment on the correct procedures which should be followed. Maybe somebody else will come along here and help. Also I can only advise you as to the principles of " wear and tear" as I understand them – but I haven't seen the marks that they are referring to. However it's not unknown for landlords to expect to be able to get an entire professional paint job at the expense of their ex-tenants.

You didn't take your own pictures going in and you didn't take your take own pictures going out – Big Fail. 

 

I believe i touched up the walls to an acceptable standard, i just hope the adjudicator agrees. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some good news, for some reason i am getting the full deposit back without any deductions, i confirmed this through my DPS account today. I dont know why the letting agent has decided not to claim against me but im not questioning it. I did think they were out of order claiming for wear and tear items. From what i know they should not be claiming this off me, they should be doing it through the DPS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

That is good news that your are getting your deposit back but wait till you have actually got it back just to be sure.

 

For future with an Landlord/Letting Agency when you move into a property it is always advisable to take photographs of every little thing not just the obvious damage/faults and the exact same when you move out.

 

As for the Deposit this should have been protected in a Tenancy Deposit Scheme and you should have been given a copy of the prescribed terms of that scheme by the Landlord/Letting Agent.

 

Yes the Landlord/Letting Agent on move out will claim via the Tenancy Deposit Scheme for damage but you should also have contacted that specific scheme yourself requesting your deposit back/complaining to them/refuting the Landlord/Letting Agents as well as complaining to them only.

 

.

  • Thanks 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/02/2020 at 00:26, stu007 said:

Hi

 

That is good news that your are getting your deposit back but wait till you have actually got it back just to be sure.

 

For future with an Landlord/Letting Agency when you move into a property it is always advisable to take photographs of every little thing not just the obvious damage/faults and the exact same when you move out.

 

As for the Deposit this should have been protected in a Tenancy Deposit Scheme and you should have been given a copy of the prescribed terms of that scheme by the Landlord/Letting Agent.

 

Yes the Landlord/Letting Agent on move out will claim via the Tenancy Deposit Scheme for damage but you should also have contacted that specific scheme yourself requesting your deposit back/complaining to them/refuting the Landlord/Letting Agents as well as complaining to them only.

 

.

 

Thanks Stu, Just to let you know the full amount is in my account. It looks like the letting agent were trying to rip me off after all. 

 

Thanks for the advise, the next property that i rent i will take pics before and after as i cannot trust the lying thieving letting agents.

 

I was given a copy of the DPS literature but all the emails from them were in my spam folder and i never know they were there. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

That is good news that you now have the deposit back and well do to you for preserving with this and hte help provided you are more than welcome.

 

Remember to have a wee look through our CAG Private Renting area have a good read especially post#4 & 5 with the PDFs that will be of help in future:

Again well done and your update is appreciated as it may help others

  • Thanks 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 16/02/2020 at 01:24, stu007 said:

Hi

 

That is good news that you now have the deposit back and well do to you for preserving with this and hte help provided you are more than welcome.

 

Remember to have a wee look through our CAG Private Renting area have a good read especially post#4 & 5 with the PDFs that will be of help in future:

Again well done and your update is appreciated as it may help others

 

Thanks for the guidance and links to help with renting, much appreciated. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...