Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


stephenXL

Southern Water/ Shulmans claimform - water and sewerage charges ...

Recommended Posts

they have 28 days to 'something'

if they dont the case gets autostayed

 

the court should write and inform you about this and ack the defence has been received.

 

now time to read up on the numerous SW/Shulman claimform threads already here so you know what the various processes are going forward if they do!!

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

Court have written 2 days ago to acknowledge receipt of defence (to both of us individually).

 

Just had a call from my ex to say she has received two letters from Shulmans.

1 addressed to her the other to me but sent to her address (despite informing them and the court of my actual address) I shall be collecting it from her shortly.

 

Gist: Shulmans have apparently handed the case back to SW&S who will be persuing the case in their own right soon enough.

 

No response so far to the CPR 31:14's .Both signed for 14th Feb at 6:40am according to PO tracking.


Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  See what happens when you submit a defence.:cool:


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Updates:

 

Court wrote to us seperately to acknowledege receipt of defence. Dated 14th Feb.

 

Letters sent by Shulmans to both of us seperately( but addressed to my exs address  as pointed out on post #52) Dated 18th Feb.

I now have my copy.

            

Inclusions: Letter from Shulmans which seems to me to be somewhat ambiguous. ( I can redact and scan this and  forward it to you if needed)

                                

N434. Notice of change of legal representative. Dated 18th Feb.                        

 

Copy of email: Send to  County Court, CCBC, from Shulmans

Stating that their client has asked to proceed as a Defended matter.    

They should like to deal with the Defence directly.

With this in mind we have attached a copy of the Notice of Change to ensure they do now have conduct of the matter.

 

Subsequent to these:

We have both received letters individually, addressed correctly, from Southern Water. Dated 21st Feb.

These letters vary from each other, effectively putting different demands upon each of us. 

 

1) From me:

they are demanding proof of addresses and proof of when I stopped occupancy at the claim address prefaced by this:

" I note that you have provided a different address from that of the claim, despite stating you are still on the tenancy agreement at the supply address and have not resided there since 2010."            

 

A couple of the addresses that would clarify the "non occupancy" from 2009 through to 2010/11"(Final Family Court hearing), were designated "safe houses" for providing safe accommodation, under court orders, for my daughter and me.

 

2) This is the whole text of the letter sent to my ex. 

I am in receipt of your letter in response to a claim against yourself and Mr XXXXXXXX.

After reviewing the account in respect of your current situation, I have requested attendance of a member of our Affordability Team, to your home address, to see if there are any schemes that may be applicable to your needs.

 

I would hope that you receive commiunication over the next week or so and a suitable date and time of his visit can be agreed.

I will be writing to Mr XXXXXXXXseparately on a diferent matter.

Signed by their Litigation executive.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In all this there has been no mention of receipt etc., of the CPR 31:14 requests.

No acknowledgement of any statute barred re-assessment of amounts claimed.

 

Would  I be wrong in guessing that unless they formally "drop" the case, they ought not to be asking these questions?

These matters are for the courts to decide?

 

Also, having been duly notified of the state of my ex's mental health issues (within both defences).

Is it appropriate for them to make a home visit conducted by a male  (quote: date and time of his  visit) to confront financial matters with someone, a vulnerable female, clearly stated as having ongoing chronic mental health issues.

 

Evidenced if necessary with documents to the effect "severe impairment, and social functioning (however caused)which appears to be permanent" signed by her GP?

 

Apologies if this appears to come across as a rant. I just get a sense that they are getting a bit slippery.

 

Thanks

 

StephenXL

 

 


Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so just a simple change of legal rep form...we've seen this in some of the other Shulman court cases, in essence as concluded before, it's getting pretty apparent that the claimant had no idea Shulmans were raising court claims on their behalf and have gotten pretty annoyed with them and have dumped them.

 

as for the home visit, that will be regard to this water Aid scheme or whatever they call it now, that they've used to help reduce or even kill dead any outstanding balance left after they remove all the bills that are either statute barred or not enforceable against a defendant.

 

the visit can be refused , you'll get a letter first to advise date/time, simply refuse it. I believe they also charge for the visit so make sure that's not added either. but there is no harm in ringing? and sorting it out on the phone as others have. all you'd need is you ex's permission if she doesn't want to go through it.

 

think that's it..

i'm sure andyorch will pop up if not.

 

but all the above we have seen several times here on the Shulman cases already.

the claimant usually now drop's the court claim or let it get autostayed, so that resolves that one too.

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

Two days ago, ex contacted by mobile phone from a guy from SW's Affordability and Vunerability team.

 

Thankfully my ex took notes of the some of the details.

 

1)Apparently:

No reductions can be backdated from before September 2019 due to a interview conducted by someone from ORBIT who took down some of her financial details.

 

Having stated that he represented Southern Water in response to an outstanding debt.

 

Entry was refused, due to anxiety, interview carried out in the corridor of the flats.

  Q: Who are ORBIT?

 

2) Moving fwd:

Two bedded flat under single occupancy (once all proof is established) would qualify ex for 20% with a further 25% off future billing reducing the annual bill from £465 to £251 approximately, under the New Start scheme.

 

However, £5 per month would then be added each month towards paying off the oustanding debt of £3698.00.

Not a mention of the amount that is Satute Barred, in fact he took the yearly bill £465. and multiplyed it back over the time frame on the claim.

 

He again made the point that the single occupancy issue could/would not be backdated. (All this related over the phone)..

 

3) Luckily ex has not agreed to anything.

I asked what the guy was like over the phone, she says suspiciously charming.

She was asked to text him back if she wished to comply with the offer.

She has not done that.

Seeking your advice first.

 

In light of other update from the CCBC.

They have sent N149A Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track, along with form N180 Directions Questionaire, along with a further enclosure EX730 Mediation advisory.All sent out on the 21st February received 25th Feb.

 

Unless we get the Staute barred section and a good reason for not backdating the single occupancy - mediation offer runs out like a "take it or leave it start position".

 

Where to go from here?

 

Thanks for the help.


Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

orbit are another name for payplan debt advisors.

supposed to be free

but I bet she got charged for the visit on her bill.

 

yes to mediation

1 wit you

3 copies

 

don't forget you each need to do the N180.

and each need to send a copy to the court and the claimant sols or the claimant if they don't appoint a new lot

 

your issues can be drummed out in the mediation session.

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen to the N180's. They will be sent out well within the timeframe, probably Friday afternoon. My ex just needs to sign hers first.

 

Thanks for all the help.....as always.

 

stephenXL


Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...