Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


confusedbunny

MET ANPR PCN - overstay - Brocklebank retail park,SE7 7SE (London)

Recommended Posts

Dear Caggers,

 

Today (23rd January 2020), I received a PCN from MET Parking Services, Here are the specifics:

Date of contravention: 28th Dec 2019

Date of issue of this notice: 20th January 2020

Maximum permitted stay: 180 Mins

Length of stay: 225 Mins

Date I received notice: 23rd January 2020 (Today)

 

I have been notified of this fine almost 26 days later, is this allowed for such a long time lapse?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Can you let us have the information requested in the forum sticky please? It will help us to advise you.

 

 

HB

  • Thanks 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement

● 28th Dec 2019

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

[scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

● 20th Jan 2020 (i do not have a scanner)

 

3 Date received 

●23rd Jan 2020

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]

●No

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

●Yes

 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

●No

 

7 Who is the parking company?

●Met parking services

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

Brocklebank retail park,SE7 7SE (London)

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

● They state that they are a creditor and i must appeal to them in the first instance, failing that, then i can appeal to POPLA (IAS)

 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

●IAS

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

●No, just recieved notice to registered keeper today (23rd January 2020)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I would say they're out of time, as you said. Let's see what the guys say.

 

HB

  • Thanks 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ntk to PDF as asked please

 

dx

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

oh one point from post 1 

it is not a fine

it's a speculative invoice for breaking some imaginary contract you entered into by entering the car park.

 

dx

 

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 my 14 days to reply to them is running out and need advice.....

 

Thats everything, front & back. I hope that is suffice.

NTK.pdf

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's manage with the front page for now, until someone advises about the MB limit.  

 Don't worry about it for now, IT can give you headaches... 


HB 

  • Thanks 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thread tidied

the reason you could upload is you sent several scans of +2md directly to screen.

 

all sort.

 

the NTK is out of time for an ANPR captures.

 

not sure why you've got to reply to them at all.

 

dx

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

until/unless you get a letter of claim from one of their favourite paperwork only fake/tame solicitor.

 

no harm in reading a few threads here mind

you'll soon get the idea.

 

dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no keeper liability because they have failed to follow the protocols of the POFA.

MET always get this wrong but hope you dont know about it.

This menas that if you do not respond you cant drop yourself in it by admitting who was driving

so let them waste their time and money writing silly letters.

 

Now you can sue them for breach of the GDPR for telling lies to obtain your keeper details and by procesing the data once they have obtained it. i would leave that for the moment though, something to threaten them with later if they are stupid enough to want to take this further than meaningless letter writing.

 

in the meanwhile get some pictures of the entrance to the land and the signage there so we can determine if they have got other things wrong as well

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...