Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Can anybody advise me please?   Been living in rented accommodation for over 11 years, old landlord who leased property with his shop has now left and so agents have become my new landlords, so gave me a new contract.   I'm really nervous as not sure what my rights are and could I get evicted as new contract says short term, 6 months.
    • It's the only way to proceed, he has to prove irrevocably that he gave me that information, and agreed to it, which he cannot do because it doesn't exist. Not only that, he sent me a trade sales invoice, other than that you're pretty spot on.
    • Sorry - need to put my glasses on!   I think you and the other posters have been at cross-purposes because they haven't followed what you are trying to argue.  You aren't arguing a fault etc with the car, you simply want to cancel it as a distance sale, and because the vendor did not provide the necessary cancellation information pre-contract in a durable medium, you are saying that you therefore have 12 months plus 14 days to cancel AND that the vendor has to pay the collection/recovery costs.   Although I understand that argument, I don't know if that's the best way to proceed or not.   I suspect not many people have tried to argue it with second-hand cars.  And that might be, for some reason I don't know, that it's a non-starter or it's too risky.
    • No, not all all.  It's up to them to prove you were the driver.  Well done in not telling them!   Remember in all this you are legally in the right.  Their parking fee was paid.  You're not trying to "get out" of something you owe.  They are in the wrong as far as the law goes.   So how about sending them something like -   Dear BW Legal,   cheers for your Letter Before Claim.   I don't earn owe your clients a bean, indeed your clients owe the driver of the vehicle who paid the parking fee - twice.  It is your clients' responsibility if the machines they buy second hand on eBay don't work properly because they're too tight to pay a technician to maintain them.   Your clients also gave me to no right of appeal or of paying a discount in contravention of their own industry's Code of Conduct.   You can either drop this foolishness now or your clients can get a good hiding in court, both are fine by me.  I fancy a winter holiday and I fancy financing it by an unreasonable costs order under CPR27.14(2)(g).   COPIED TO NCP   The reason i say to send to NCP too is because unscrupulous solicitors are well into their clients starting claims which are bound to lose, after all they get the £££ in any case.
    • appeal one has ref number showing other pix to screen removed please use PDF only     dx
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

Recommended Posts

mmm

 

https://www.pestfix.co.uk/coronavirus-personal-kit----face-masks-and-alcohol-sanitiser.asp

 

Cheaper at Aldi Under 6 quid for ten if I remember rightly - thats 30 quid for 50

plus less than a quid for the tiny bottle of sanitizer or a bit more for a much bigger one

 

 

Should have gone to Aldi Boris.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I express my honestly held opinions - they are nothing more or less than that.

... Its just doing some due diligence that makes them seem unusual ...

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

It isn't realistic to lock all those with underlying conditions and over 70s in their homes for the rest of the year   It would have to be properly organised. We have various family members

With Schools usually breaking up for the Summer Holidays in July, I do not see the point of sending youngsters back before September.  Government might just have managed to improve on their safety pro

A Dalek enforcing strict quarantining on a neighbourhood. You can't get more British than this   https://tinyurl.com/uzox4hy

Posted Images

He wasn't up to much  between that case and now though, it seemed.  That PPE malarkey needs sorting there is something dodgy and an inkling of spivvery there.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Peanuts to what they are paying Serco for various other contracts with Track & Trace, and housing asylum seekers.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's still lost money though, it could have been spent on something worthwhile, BN.

 

When I said £400m, I was including Pestfix and the confectionary wholesaler whose name I can never remember.

 

No wonder the government wants to get rid of judicial reviews.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its what you get when 'the government' is prepared to lie through its teeth, then carry on lying through its teeth, whatever the cost to anyone else, to cover up their lies

 

Remember all the PPE that handcock claimed was coming from Turkey?

*while UK manufactured PPE was going abroad as the UK gov ignored offers from the manufacturers)

 

... and Turkey saying 'they asked us yesterday a week later

Then planes sent over to bring back almost sod all and most of that not suitable ...

 

Remember the easiest deal in history, us holding all the cards, which will give us EU market access without the costs and with deals across the world larger than the EU

.. and now the Johnson muppet show can't even negotiate 'the easiest deal in history' when he has 'all the cards' - including a majority in the UK

 

There's statistics, lies, damn lies, and then theres everything that comes out of johnsons' gob for which there is simply no appropriately derogatory term

 

'Johnson said' should become Synonymous with talking utter incompetent  lying sh** continuously, unashamedly and unapologetically for a lifetime

 

I express my honestly held opinions - they are nothing more or less than that.

... Its just doing some due diligence that makes them seem unusual ...

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Even claiming 300,000 a day capacity is clearly just lying as amply demonstrated on days when there are no tests available.

 

Actual real achievable reasonably consistent maximum capacity to actually test people unquestionably seems to be around 80,000 a day.

 

3 years none stop testing to test the UK population just once.

  • Like 1

I express my honestly held opinions - they are nothing more or less than that.

... Its just doing some due diligence that makes them seem unusual ...

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dr North's take here, can't really disagree with him

 

https://www.turbulenttimes.co.uk/news/corona/coronavirus-about-time/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has been pushing that viewpoint from the beginning of the crisis.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I express my honestly held opinions - they are nothing more or less than that.

... Its just doing some due diligence that makes them seem unusual ...

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Independent Sage met yesterday and has a new report out.

 

They think the national test and trace system doesn't work and are urging the government not to renew Serco's contract. They say the job should be done by GPs and local public health people who are already deal with the more complex cases and care homes.

 

https://www.independentsage.org/an-independent-sage-discussion-document-on-contact-tracing-and-self-isolation/

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Serco are not up to the job, but director's of Serco are buddies with Ministers handing out contracts like confetti on the back of Covid.  Track & Trace and Isolate should be a LA competence, not private firms on the make.

 

Interesting blog today, the genesis of the crisis started with Blair in 2005, subsequent administrations did nothing to improve responses to pandemic.

 

https://www.turbulenttimes.co.uk/news/corona/scared-to-death/

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When will most schools actually re-open in September ?

 

And when they open, will they be providing teaching over the number hours 9am to 3pm  ?

 

I am thinking of the school I attended, which was a large Victorian building, with many modern extensions.  The classrooms which could accommodate about 35 Children elbow to elbow, will only be able to accommodate 20 at the most with any reasonable distancing.   Or does the whole class  of say 35 stay in a bubble and the teachers move around to teach the different subjects ? 

 

I can see many schools opening later in September, not for all pupils for all days and not doing the full hours.

 

This is going to be very difficult to manage for all those concerned, including parents looking to return to work. 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

To me, it isn't just about social distancing and hygiene measures. I'm far from the first to say it but until there's a reliable track and trace system, I don't think this can be managed properly.

 

Children may not suffer as much as adults, although some do, they can be asymptomatic and pass on the virus to the rest of the family.

 

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/lockdown-david-king-second-wave-18739973

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

"Ministers have rejected a call from the children’s commissioner for England to bring in routine coronavirus testing in English schools."

 

"Nick Gibb, the schools minister, confirmed that teachers and pupils in England will not have access to routine testing when they reopen in September and will instead be reliant primarily on hygiene and distancing measures to control any spread of the virus."

 

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/aug/09/ministers-reject-call-for-weekly-covid-19-testing-in-english-schools

 

"New swab tests to confirm within 90 minutes if someone has Covid-19, as well as testing for flu, will be rolled out from next week, but Gibb confirmed that these would not as yet be used in schools."

 

Now I agree that getting our kids educated SAFELY should be our number ONE priority ..

But sending kids back into schools without a proper testing and monitoring regime to protect not just the children and teachers, but the families the children will return to, is not just 'morally indefensible' its criminal.

 

And effectively saying 'we'll test them once they show symptoms and have had time to spread it ... is beyond simply criminal.

 

Edited by tobyjugg2
  • Thanks 1

I express my honestly held opinions - they are nothing more or less than that.

... Its just doing some due diligence that makes them seem unusual ...

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, cjcregg said:

Is there any evidence that mass speculative testing is an effective strategy in reducing transmission?

 

I don't think there is.

 

For my part I'm talking about targeted testing and tracing that's done locally. Speculative testing sounds like the Deloitte type car park testing centres who then don't send test results to local public health people who are able to act promptly if they're informed, or at best sent to them too late to be of any use.

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, cjcregg said:

Is there any evidence that mass speculative testing is an effective strategy in reducing transmission?

 

 

I think any decent person would say that people should have been 'speculatively' tested before they were sent back from hospital into care homes given the evidence we have seen,

and that people returning from international 'hot spots' should have been 'speculatively' tested

 

... even if the common sense of it didn't break through at the time, and even given the more limited claims of testing effectiveness at the time.

 

and most would maybe even see, in the light of information we now have, (care homes and even luxury liners)

- that a regular regime of testing, would have almost certainly easily saved thousands of lives.

 

Now apply that to schools - hundreds of children all together in a small area, going home without 14 day self isolations  - or even going home to 14 day isolation to their siblings and parents and a home environment.

 

 

Of course there is 'little actual evidence' of kids being seriously ill and dying in this precise situation is there cjregg - as they have been locked down,

but then again there is no direct evidence that you jumping off a precisely 500 foot cliff would harm you in any way is there ...

Bet you wouldn't though.

 

I'm nominating you for the monthly 'Johnson says' award in the junior class cjregg ...

 

I express my honestly held opinions - they are nothing more or less than that.

... Its just doing some due diligence that makes them seem unusual ...

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I think will happen.

 

Schools will be told by ministers that they have to open for all pupils, unless there is a local lock down in operation.  And pupils will be required to attend, unless they have confirmed health condition, where Doctors have advised against attendance.  Parents will face fines for not ensuring their Children attend.

 

Trace, trace system relies on people reporting and having tests done.  Many people who think they just have seasonal colds/flu won't bother to report or have tests done.  Plus many people with Covid-19 don't feel any symptoms, but have been found by recent research to be just as good at infecting others, as those with identifiable symptoms. 

 

I can see many localised lock downs been implemented in a sporadic way  and it will make it incredibly difficult for people.  And for organisations and business, the on/off nature of the lock downs will be worse than having a lock down for say 1 month..   If for example,  you had a school based in one city area that was not subject to lock down, but a number of teachers lived in a lock down area, you would question whether they should be commuting to work.  Is the journey essential, risk of spreading virus risk?    

 

Hope that Government have really detailed guidance and plans to deal with all of the issues that people are going to face in only a months time.  As soon as you have millions of people meeting in classrooms around  the country and then returning home to family, there is reasonable expectation of the virus numbers increasing.  And flowing from that you will have the many sporadic lock downs which will be very difficult to manage. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've already presented most of para 1 Unc,

 

but this is what worries me given the intent to not test:

"On average, the coronavirus accumulates about two changes per month in its genome. "

 

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/07/pandemic-virus-slowly-mutating-it-getting-more-dangerous

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7293453/

 

 

Whats that going to do with a couple of million kids with undevloped immune systems to work with?

Let alone the rest of their families, and whoever they come into contact with

 

 

 

So with no testing until an outbreak is well in progress, and The 'world beating' Johnson waffle ap and surrounding quiz and barbecue trace infrastructure already quite clearly demonstrated it neither trustworthy, or up to the task even if it were 'trusted.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/05/englands-contact-tracers-making-handful-of-calls-a-month

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/aug/08/just-10-enforcement-orders-issued-for-breach-of-uk-quarantine-rules

 

I express my honestly held opinions - they are nothing more or less than that.

... Its just doing some due diligence that makes them seem unusual ...

 

Its official: Boris 'The Liar' Johnsons word is not worth the paper its written on

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...