Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mutating Corona Virus


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 440 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No long berore Sturgeon puts her 14 day quarantine on Sassenachs coming in to Scotland then.😂

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone know how Johnson intends to deal with people (eg his dad) who travel to other countries before travelling on - to avoid any restrictions?

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Record low: living standards and investment

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

“This is specifically not allowed. Mr. Mansour used to be a Cabinet Minister in Egypt, he has given the Tories a huge amount of money, and immediately gets a knighthood.

That seems straightforwardly corrupt.  Shouldn’t they both be in jail?”

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A test on return perhaps?

With people held in hotels until the test result which should be within 24 hours

 

.. y'now a sensible definitive and effective approach for a change ..

 

 

perhaps they will take the sensible approach to get Shapps out of the thick of it being as he ignored his own advise to everyone else not to travel abroad ...

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Record low: living standards and investment

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

“This is specifically not allowed. Mr. Mansour used to be a Cabinet Minister in Egypt, he has given the Tories a huge amount of money, and immediately gets a knighthood.

That seems straightforwardly corrupt.  Shouldn’t they both be in jail?”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes

"With one sentence and a chuckle, the transport secretary crushed the hopes of the UK travel industry for an early resumption in anything like normal business.

Grant Shapps was talking to Nick Robinson on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme about a possible resumption of activity when the UK’s current lockdown ends on 7 May."

 

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/transport-secretary-grant-shapps-summer-holiday-a9469946.html

“I won’t be booking a summer holiday at this point, let’s put it that way.” said Shapps

 

 

If you google you will also see him saying Johnson snr was fine with his travel fiddling, and that travel advise 'was optional'

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1304498/grant-shapps-travel-advice-stanley-johnson-boris-coronavirus

 

 

So did Stanley Johnson self isolate for 14 days on return, ...  anyone?

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Record low: living standards and investment

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

“This is specifically not allowed. Mr. Mansour used to be a Cabinet Minister in Egypt, he has given the Tories a huge amount of money, and immediately gets a knighthood.

That seems straightforwardly corrupt.  Shouldn’t they both be in jail?”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno, maybe he just wandered around the world for a couple of weeks to avoid actually being locked down to prevent spread

unlike us mere mortals are  ..

 

 

A quick search seems to indicate he carries on doing whatever he liked:

 

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=stanley+johnson+lockdown&t=ffsb&ia=web

 

One example

https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1279577/Stanley-Johnson-breaks-lockdown-rules-Boris-Johnson-baby-Wilfred-GMB-ITV

 

 

.

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Record low: living standards and investment

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

“This is specifically not allowed. Mr. Mansour used to be a Cabinet Minister in Egypt, he has given the Tories a huge amount of money, and immediately gets a knighthood.

That seems straightforwardly corrupt.  Shouldn’t they both be in jail?”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still find it difficult to believe that people returning are just 'told they should self isolate for 14 days and sent of to wherever, however to do whatever without even the two minute swab test.

 

All those people have to get somewhere, somehow from the airport, with not a clue whether they are infected or not

 

If they are swabbed then at least once the results come back (if they don't lose them) they will have a start to the trace - and they will have  a good idea how much of an issue it really is  - even if they are then sent out to seed the rest of the herd on their way home.

 

Johnson/Handcock must believe either:

* the folk returning have a very low risk of infection and this Spanish lockdown is bluster and posturing

or

* that the herd isn't infected enough in the UK

 

Which is it - Method? or just populist madness?

The apparent approach certainly isn't sense or science.

 

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Record low: living standards and investment

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

“This is specifically not allowed. Mr. Mansour used to be a Cabinet Minister in Egypt, he has given the Tories a huge amount of money, and immediately gets a knighthood.

That seems straightforwardly corrupt.  Shouldn’t they both be in jail?”

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if it's cock up or conspiracy but it's sounding like last time when HMG decided doing nothing was the easiest option - for them.

 

So far Indie Sage and John Ashton haven't said anything but I'm keeping an eye on their Twitter feeds.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/mar/22/no-10-denies-claim-dominic-cummings-argued-to-let-old-people-die

 

https://www.courthousenews.com/boris-johnsons-talk-of-herd-immunity-raises-alarms/

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1258644/Boris-Johnson-coronavirus-Dominic-Cummings-pensioners

 

https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2020/03/17/1085943/covid-19-uks-herd-immunity-experiment

 

https://www.politico.eu/article/herd-immunity-was-never-uk-coronavirus-strategy-chief-scientific-adviser-says/

 

paywall

https://www.ft.com/content/38a81588-6508-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Record low: living standards and investment

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

“This is specifically not allowed. Mr. Mansour used to be a Cabinet Minister in Egypt, he has given the Tories a huge amount of money, and immediately gets a knighthood.

That seems straightforwardly corrupt.  Shouldn’t they both be in jail?”

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember that back in March. I wonder if Cummings ever understood herd immunity properly. Can a person be so evil that they don't care if tens of thousands of people die unnecessarily?

 

Here's some good news in all of this, Oxford University's Recovery programme.

 

 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/26/the-observer-view-on-britains-covid-19-response-recovery

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cummings well deserves the nickname Demonic.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, honeybee13 said:

I remember that back in March. I wonder if Cummings ever understood herd immunity properly. Can a person be so evil that they don't care if tens of thousands of people die unnecessarily?

 

Here's some good news in all of this, Oxford University's Recovery programme.

 

 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/26/the-observer-view-on-britains-covid-19-response-recovery

 

 

Unequivocally demonstrates that there are still absolutely outstanding UK scientists and doctors

 

Shame Johnson doesn't want to find and listen to them.

... in fact carefully picks yes men twats to spout the advice he (Cummings) chooses

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Record low: living standards and investment

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

“This is specifically not allowed. Mr. Mansour used to be a Cabinet Minister in Egypt, he has given the Tories a huge amount of money, and immediately gets a knighthood.

That seems straightforwardly corrupt.  Shouldn’t they both be in jail?”

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you return from Spain, get tested and test negative do you still have to isolate for 14 days?  If yes - why?

 

My granddaughter had a slightly raised temperature on waking from a nap at nursery, sent home and refused back until she (and parents) all tested negative.  Whole process took three days because of a weekend and others have been cleared within 24 hours.

 

 

Edited by hightail
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good question. This is what happens when policy is made up as they go along. It may be a numbers/costs issue. Thousands of people will be landing back on a daily basis and if they offered a test (assuming most are negative)in lieu of 14 day quarantine, people would do that. Particularly if they will lose 14 days pay.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hightail said:

If you return from Spain, get tested and test negative do you still have to isolate for 14 days?  If yes - why?

 

My granddaughter had a slightly raised temperature on waking from a nap at nursery, sent home and refused back until she (and parents) all tested negative.  Whole process took three days because of a weekend and others have been cleared within 24 hours.

 

 

 

I should imagine based on form so far that if you are a Johnson, Jenrick or Cummings then you do what you like anyway

If you are a mere mortal, you are still in lockdown even if tested negative unless clearly stated otherwise.

 

 

 

Lets examine the situation

If there are 100,000 people a day returning from Spain (or any other alleged hotspot), thats still less than half of the claimed daily testing capacity most of which is apparently NOT being used.

(Actually seems to be less than is NOT being used every day)

 

I see no reason why the returnees should not be prioritised in the testing as they are 'returning' from alleged higher risk zones, and are not in lockdown as any other non-returning from abroad test'ees already in the system should be.

Most have no other way to get a test apart from claiming symptoms.

 

The results should EASILY be done in less than 24 hours and not just in the the case of major airports, with minimal cost.

A small team to take the swaps, the swabs couriered to nearest labs while the returnees are lodged one night or at most two locally - being shipped to the holding hotel in a controlled way.

A needed boost to the hoteliers too (who pays - gov (taxpayer) does as they already are)

Not cost free, but whats the alternative

 

If they test negative, send them on their way and perhaps schedule a confirmatory 2nd test 5 days down the line. No lockdown until a positive result - but stress extra vigilence.

All controlled, the people affected mostly understanding that whats being done is competent, controlled  and necessary.

 

 

 

and I do understand the issues with people who simply don't trust this government with their swabs and medical data. I don't either.

Just like a police DNA test - there needs to be acceptable assurances over its use and retention

 

 

As it stands with Handcock/Johnson/Cummings plan :

100,000 potential pandemic seeds sent into the country to travel home every day, just like before

No lessons learnt.

 

What cost if the actual threat is real and cases increase do to the UK gov doing nowt but issuing an incompetent directive which their own people will probably breach anyway?

£10M, £100M? A lot more than that I think.

What cost to the UK's already shredded standing?

 

But they seem to be choosing to issue a directive and abdicating responsibility and avoiding the real issues.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Record low: living standards and investment

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

“This is specifically not allowed. Mr. Mansour used to be a Cabinet Minister in Egypt, he has given the Tories a huge amount of money, and immediately gets a knighthood.

That seems straightforwardly corrupt.  Shouldn’t they both be in jail?”

Link to post
Share on other sites

More on the quarantine confusion. Spain have provided region by region Covid numbers and pointed out that six of their regions are better off than the UK.

 

Airlines UK are asking for airport testing, as TJ suggested.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/27/uk-extends-spain-travel-advice-holiday-islands-canary-balearics-coronavirus

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe better to holiday in UK?  Oops wait a minute, Wee Krankie might yet put a 14 Day quarantine on visitors from England Wales & NI.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wee Nicola has handled the epidemic reasonably well, I think. Better than no 10 anyway.

 

They said yesterday that anyone booking a holiday abroad does so at their own risk - very sympathetic. Aren't they the ones that wanted to get the travel industry working again?

 

That said, I don't think I would leave the country if it meant quarantine on my return, plus it's good to support UK tourism.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes only issue with Sturgeon is she is so intent on pushing Independence, any and all crises are a tool she uses to chip away.  Johnson & hancock have not handled it well, mind you they planned for the wrong disease and are still floundering around trying to use a flu plan for a SARS.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprised anyone dare travel anywhere with 100,000 untested potential pandemic seeds wandering across Britain every day, perhaps to their first second or third homes and stopping off for an eyetest and the children to have a P here and there and of course dropping off at work on the way ....

 

 

Oh - and stopping off at the supermarkets for essential supplies of course ..

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Record low: living standards and investment

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

“This is specifically not allowed. Mr. Mansour used to be a Cabinet Minister in Egypt, he has given the Tories a huge amount of money, and immediately gets a knighthood.

That seems straightforwardly corrupt.  Shouldn’t they both be in jail?”

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 440 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...