Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Single yellow line rules on signage


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1500 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Unfortunately a relative in my car parked on a Sun night (7pm-10:30pm) on a single yellow line.

Lots of other cars parked there.

He couldn't see a sign on his side of the road.

 

On his return there was a civil enforcement officer giving him a ticket.

The nearest sign (showing restriction 7am-midnight every day) was about 150m away (he agreed that distance with the CEO who said he'd note that down - not sure where).

 

I can't find the rules of how close signs need to be but am hoping this has breached those rules!!

Advice gratefully received.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really. The signs have to go where they are practical. Every single yellow should have a time plate, and the motorist has to look for it - you can just say you couldn't see it. If it's there, and I assume the CEO took a photo of it, then the driver has neglected his obligation to find out what the restriction is before parking.

 

The only way you might be able to argue this is if the sign is next to a separate stretch of yellow line - eg, separated from the one he parked on by, say, a road junction or a parking bay. Every individual stretch of line needs its own sign.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

One more quick question. I was looking again at the ticket and the image evidence. The photos were taken at 22:03 and 22:06. The ticket just says that the car was observed from 22:04 to 22:04. Presumably one is  allowed a few minutes grace to actually park and look for the sign? The contravention is code 01.

Should the ticket show a period of time between which the car is observed and if so how long?

I’m hopeful the ticket might be cancelled on a procedural error!

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was there a loading ban in place? Or any other restriction which might complicate matters?

 

Please could you tell us the exact location the car was parked?

 

Basically you should be given an observation time on a single yellow. Without it, you would have grounds to argue the case, but it's not a slam-dunk winner. Maybe if we can be sure there was just a standard single yellow restriction in force, then that will clarify matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again. 
It was on East End Rd Finchley . The council PCN viewer says

Street EAST END ROAD Location No waiting Contravention Code 01

Does the no waiting mean you don’t even get a minute to check the signs? 
The sign that was 150m away doesn’t have any thing unusual about it - the regular red circle filled with blue with a red line across and the restricted times underneath. 
I don’t live in the area but could get someone to check for any other markings if needed.

many thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you are entitled to a grace period, but not for checking signs. However there are other reasons and so you should be given an observation period, typically five minutes.

 

I was hoping to see the exact spot on Google Street View, to be certain what the restriction was and that you had been issued with the correct contravention code, but East End Road is very long. Do you know exactly where the car was parked?

 

If not, you can still appeal, but the more knowledge we have up-front, the better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again

The car was parked between the section of East End Road between the junction of Windermere Ave and Manor View. It was on the opposite side of the road to the junction with Windermere Ave and much closer to that road than the roundabout where Manor View is.  The nearest sign was on lampost marked 14 outside 23 East End Rd.

Hope that makes sense!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a look at street view the signs are 8am to midnight there seems to be quite a few one is near the corner of Windermere ave opposite the long row of conifers. I think the google street view I'm looking at is 2019 capture date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Judging by the photo and your description, it's a standard single yellow, so the contravention code is correct. It does say until midnight. I would say the signage is just about adequate, and there's a sign on that unbroken stretch of line.

 

I don't see any loading restriction.

 

You have exemptions for stopping on a yellow line: letting passengers in or out (which includes helping them to or from a house) and for loading/unloading and associated activity. That's why an observation period is necessary, and usually you will be given five minutes to allow you to return.

 

My understanding is that the observation period is discretionary, but so universally applied as to be expected. I woud recommend you appeal on the lack of observation period. The driver may well have been doing these activities - I don't know, and neither did the CEO, so worth a try.

Edited by Jamberson
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help. Unfortunately, as predicted, the council refused the appeal - I received the following response:

 

The Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO) observed your vehicle parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours.

The restrictions are marked by a single yellow line. This is an instant contravention.

 

I have noted your comment advising that no observation period was given to you before the PCN was issued.

Regretfully, I am unable to cancel the PCN based on the circumstances you have described.

 

If a CEO observes a vehicle parked in contravention of the restrictions in place, a PCN may be issued without any observation time given. The CEO is under no obligation to wait.

 

The onus is on the driver to ensure that their vehicle is parked in accordance with the restrictions at all times.

This restriction is enforced between 8am - Midnight.

 

As the vehicle was parked within the restricted times, the PCN was issued correctly.

It is the responsibility of the driver to ensure they are familiar with and to comply with the onstreet restrictions in place.

If this cannot be done for whatever reason, alternative parking should be sought. 

 

Seems rather harsh on a very wide London street on a Sunday eve but there it is.

A lesson learned for my son!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 30/01/2020 at 21:37, hello12345 said:

If your car breaks down on yellow lines you can get away with it,  but you need prove off the AA  ect.

 

Sorry, but where does the OP say the vehicle had broken down?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...