Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Different statements. One has “at 59 mph overtaking on the approach” and the other “it was overtaking on the approach and in ....... at 49 mph”. So not the same statement (same ethos, different sentence structure).   perhaps they chose that site for the officer because it is an accident hotspot, and they know people do dodgy overtakes (while speeding) there .....??  
    • Hi.   I've moved your thread to the Bailiffs forum. People should be along to advise later.   HB
    • So a little update;   Of the 6 letters I sent 3 were acknowledged. One accepting £1/month for now and two from the same creditor trading under different names asking for full I&E which I haven't done.   In a moment of madness I managed to depsoit 5k to a gambling site I didn't have due to paypal's crazy policy of allowing payments which are to be collected by direct debit after a couple of days to gambling sites! Mad they allow this but this will show as a negative paypal balance (in a different account to the original "debt"). The first paypal -£5k account has been closed and passed to a DCA now. I have ignored them.   My council has appeared to have stepped up their collection efforts for £2.5k in alleged housing benefit overpayment from 2015/16. I have acknowledged their letters over the past 3 years each time by email but they rarely respond to my pleas. I truly think if there was overpayment then it was for less than half the amount they claim. At the time I didn't think I was being overpaid because I wasn't really working but I had stopped claiming JSA/ESA (and told them as much) but earned a couple of hundred pounds a month from sporadic work.   Also what I thought was a dormant debt from 2016 to Halifax has been actually sold ( to caboot? I think. Hard to keep track of everyone)   I've been getting phone calls daily but ignoring them for the most part. I did request all communication in writing in my original letters.   I feel incapable of dealing with these creditors and whilst initially I was feeling that I would be happy to just ignore all the letters (arreas, defaults and the like) and phone calls for an indefinite amount of time and  hope to make it 6 years to statute barred-ness and accept or defend any CCJ attempts that did arrive. I figured that avoiding these creditors for 3 months so far is 5% of the way there to statute barred! But I figre for these fairly sizeable amounts they probably won't all let it go and I will get some CCJ docs (never had to deal with that) However now my mood and thinking has changed.    I am looking again at insolvency. I'm over the DRO limit now so its BR or nothing. I was wondering why you said to not consider this and it would be stupid @dx100uk? Although shirking my debts/responsibilities it does seem like an "easy" way out at the moment. It would be so nice to know that what's done is done and to be able to draw a line in the sand and start again in a year or so and not have to avoid creditors or worry about what's coming next...   It certainly would help the environment what with the amount of letters that are arriving already(!) considering the first payment I missed was october/november (excluding the old halifax and council debts). I am exordinately stressed about it now even though I thought I would be already . Any advice would be great if it was to get my head out of the sand and contact people/do the ignoring thing and seeing what happens/reasons  to do or not to do bankruptcy for these unsecured debts?   Thanks      
    • Hi everybody   Had a knock on my door and was confronted by either a Bailiff or enforcement agent (not sure about the specific job title). When I opened the door he stuck his foot in so I couldn't close the door. I was video taping him so I took a few steps backward (to get him in shot) and he just fully entered the property despite me saying that I was denying him entry and he refused to leave thereafter.   Turns out that he was there to collect a court issued fine. I think from a Magistrates Court. He worked for this outfit:   www.marstonholdings.co.uk   The reason for the fine was something to do with "driving without car insurance". Now I had a cheap car a few years ago but it broke down and would cost more to fix than it was actually worth. So I sold the car for scrap and cancelled the insurance. Turns out you have to inform the DVLA when you scrap a car and them that it is no longer on the road (I was unaware). So this was the circumstances of the visit.   My question is did he have the lawful right to enter the property? I always thought these people were like vampires i.e. they can only come in if you invite them in.   tia Bear  
    • oppss again then if its the same person.   knows the road well so should know what the speeds are and where they apply..      
  • Our picks

tonycard

UKCPS MNPR PCN - operator pix - Woodside Hotel Birkenhead - but i had a valid ticket!

Recommended Posts

valid ticket displayed yet still got a penalty notice through the post, I still have the ticket,

 

should I  appeal or just ignore it?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

1 Date of the infringement 15 01 20

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 

[scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

 

3 Date received 18 01 20

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Front Registration Plate

 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] NO

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

 

7 Who is the parking company? ukcps

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Woodside Hotel Birkenhead

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA

 

 

ticket+NTK.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry had to remove your atttachments, personal identifiers and vehicle VRN wer visible coulkd you repost as 1 multipage PDF with any VRN names and barcoded hidden please

 

As you paid they are on a sticky wicket so what are they issuing the charge for?

 

The team will no doubt be along soon with advice.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thread tidied.

 

did you get a windscreen ticket or is this another case of UKCPS and the vanishing PCN...

 

how long did £3 get you?

 

looks like they are trying to say you made an overstay.

 

dx

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Entry time 15 Jan 09.03 valid until 23.59

 

Time ticket issued for parking charge 10.45

 

No windscreen ticket just letter through post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't that a bit premature for a NTK?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:noidea: weird.

 

but don't respond nor appeal.

 

let the experts fathom this one out.

 

but these ukcps MNPR (no such thing in the private parking guides etc by ipc or bpa) are all weird

they seem to think an operator with a camera can have magical powers and with regard to NTK time limits without issuing a windscreen pcn (29 - 56 days)

 

you might find its the usual game of a local employee being paid money to dcx people in in.

when it breaks all GDPR/DPA regs)

 

dx

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems a bit strange to claim that you do not have a pay and display ticket then only show your reg. no without showing your windscreen where you would expect the ticket to be. Do they show a picture of your windscreen as well as the reg.number?

The PCN does not show your entry and leaving times which means that if between paying for your parking and the mobile photographer seeing your car without a ticket and issuing you a PCN, you have no proof that you had purchased a ticket within the ten miute grace period.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have uploaded scans I think, the ticket I purchased shows entry time 15 Jan 09.03.

The time  issued on the NTK  is 10.45

The only photograph on the NTK is front reg

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There must be another photograph somewhere since that picture could have been taken anywhere. It also does not prove there was not a ticket on the windscreen. Do they have a website where you can see more pictures of the alleged event?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the only photo they sent, If there is a website I cant find it,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they are IPC members so they use the poor wording of the law to avoid having to give a discount period to the keeper and wait beofre they demand their money from someone who doesnt owe it. All legal if immoral as the POFA doesnt state they must use method A and if that isnt possible method B so they choose an inappropriate method and dress it up.

Yopu might get some mileage out of this i a court but it hasnt been tested either way but I would say that they will tip the balance of probabilities in your favour when it comes to reliability of witnesses.

What I would do is let them waste their time and money sending you all sorts of drivel through the post and then respond to their LBA (usually courtesy of the brilliant Will and John at Gladstones who just coincidentally own the IPC) by telling them that you still have the ticket and that you will be suing their client for breach of the GDPR and seeking a massive whack for costs as the demand is vexed.

Only when you get as far as a LBA though

they also have a MASSIVE problem with the grace and observation period as this demand is after the new BPA rules came into play The fact they are IPC members doesnt matter, if their actions dont reach the gold standard they still lose regardless of the IPC CoP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...