Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
    • Confirmed with Central Contact Centre that the hearing is 24th, disappointed I can't speak directly with the local county court I have to email the local court apparently is the only way. The agent couldn't explain the discrepancy between the two letters, she sounded very confused. If they were identical letters in wording but only dates were different I would feel ok, slightly worried the wording differs...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot and Resolvecall - old co-op loan


roygoodbeat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1553 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just wanted some advice.

 

I have had Cabot writing to me for the last couple of years chasing an old debt which they allege is a co-OP loan.

I have ignored them, as well as the previous companies for 10 years.

It will be statue barred.

 

They recently changed tactics.

They first wrote a letter saying thankyou for the recent payment, then letters saying why have you stopped paying.

Then they have instructed resolvecall to visit my home.

I have made no payment to them.

 

I have an account with cabot for another debt which I have been paying for 5 years , but never have had any statements from them.

I wrote to them when I moved about the change of address but was specific under gdpr that the address was for that account only.

They appear to have applied to this other alleged account which they have been writing for. 

 

What should I do as it is already stressing me out and I have spent the last 10 years first getting over depression and rebuilding my life!

Don't want to go back there again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Cabot and Resolvecall - old co-op loan

urm..you seem to be getting a bit confused upon what address should be used when chasing debts ...but never mind.

its better they know how to contact you that stops backdoor CCJ's.

 

and as you've had a couple of CCJ's ...you'll know why that's important.

 

if the debt is statute barred, then send our SB letter.

 

as for the otherone you are paying to cabot ...hope you sent a CCA request?

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cripes you need to make sure all accounts have your current address. Do this immediately, GDPR has nothing to do with this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. I will send a staue barred letter. Was trying to keep things simple. What about their claim that I have made a payment?

 

On the other account, which had a ccj on (over 8 years old and paying) surely under the consumer credit act, they are obliged to send an annual statement or every 6 months. 

 

I have been reluctant to write to them as this opens up a can of worms and they try all sorts of tactics. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you make reference to the agreement number when paying the CCJ debt  ?  With regards to statements...there is a lot of things they should be doing but dont.....as advised SAR get all your data and check that payments are not being misappropriated to get around statute barring.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

as for the one with the CCJ...what do you made by 'had' a CCJ?

it still has a CCJ - you've not settled the judgement yet and are still paying it...?

 

I see you have a couple of threads regarding CCJ's...might be best to post on the thread regarding that CCJ rather than here?

let me know which one it is and we'll re open the thread.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

stuff and all any dca can do...they are not bailiffs.

least of all at  your door..

 

if he does appear

film him on your phone

do not engage 

simply say leave my property and do not return else i'll call police 101.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick bit of advice. I wrote to cabot asking for a sar on the account I pay. Just got a letter back saying they do not have to send anything under this account number as this was subject to a legal case, but would send a statement out seperatly. They also included loads of other accounts numbers. Two I think are with Barclaycard, which I won in court, and the other is this co-OP loan they allege. 

 

They have also said they will not release any info unless I confirm my identity by phone or sending copies of passports ect. They say that the date they have to send is from when I send back this information. Does not sound right. I also think they are trying to get me to acknowledge these other debts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you moved since they attained the CCJ?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. The ccj is from sainsburys. I lost in court at the time as cabots solicitors only gave me their court pack 5 minutes before going in. Was innocent at the time in this process.

 

I wrote to them with change of address a while ago but looks like they have only just amended my details. ( they wrote time at my new address but only applied it to another account) been paying the ccj for sainsburys since 2911 but never had a statement. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cabots solicitors , I thought sainbury's took you to court themselves?

and cabot latterly were sold the debt/CCJ?

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...