Jump to content


in a DMP - Satsuma won't default me but keep using other markers..


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1535 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I’m looking for some advice,

 

stupidly in 2016-2017 I took out a number of payday short term loans.

I entered a DMP with Step change in January 2018, thankfully I am now in a better place and will be debt free in 2023.

 

After looking at my credit file recently I have noticed a particular company is marking my credit file with late payment markers and have been doing so since January 2018.

 

I have requested they place a default on my file from 2018 stating “The ICO advises that as a general guide defaults should be recorded between 3 – 6 months after the arrears were first incurred. All my other creditors have defaulted me within 6 months of entering the DMP which has resulted in the correct entries being on my file for the correct amount of time, namely six years, and I would ask that you consider amending my record and recording a default at the correct time on my file and notifying me of the same.”

 

They have not upheld my complaint stating “at no point there has been three consecutive payments missed for you your account to be defaulted.”

 

 Can someone advise please on what options I now have?

In my opinion they are wrong with their decision. 

 

Best regards  

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't have to be three in a row.

but there now must be as you are in a DMP!!

 

who?

 

if you had loads of PDl's in a short period, and your credit file already had defaults Etc ETc why have you not considered firing off an irresponsible lending claim to each original PDL creditor?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your swift responses.

 

It's Satsuma

I have two loans with them , their email replies are showing as Provident.

I have had 24 consecutive missed payments on both loans on my credit files but they still won't agree to a default.

 

Seems to be a flaw in credit reporting.

If I didn't pay anything they would place a default on my file

but I'm doing as best as I can to repay and they are penalising me and I am worse off.

I am worse off than someone who doesn't make any effort to pay.

It doesn't make sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no wonder ..ruddy provident.

not sure how many times the authorities have penalised or criticised that lot in the last 5yrs ..I've lost count

 

as a side issue, was your credit file already shot with defaults from other lenders and late markers etc when these were taken out?

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to in a DMP - Satsuma won't default me but keep using other markers..

There were a number of defaults on it but not as many as now, every other lender have agreed to default my credit entry to 2018 except them. I'm not sure what to do now. They rejected an irresponsible lending complaint from me sometime last year.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you goto the fos with the irl refusal?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just realised I haven't sent an IR complaint to them.

 

My credit report at the time did contain missed payments and defaults, it still does and is worse since. 

 

At that time June 2017 I had more but they have fallen off my credit file now.

 

Should I go to them with an irresponsible lending complaint.

I expect what answer they will conclude with.

 

I am very deflated with their decision, if I didn't pay anything to them for a number of months they would have defaulted me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get an IRL complaint in now.

typically that will mean it vanishes from CRA file. at the very least.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...