Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Different statements. One has “at 59 mph overtaking on the approach” and the other “it was overtaking on the approach and in ....... at 49 mph”. So not the same statement (same ethos, different sentence structure).   perhaps they chose that site for the officer because it is an accident hotspot, and they know people do dodgy overtakes (while speeding) there .....??  
    • Hi.   I've moved your thread to the Bailiffs forum. People should be along to advise later.   HB
    • So a little update;   Of the 6 letters I sent 3 were acknowledged. One accepting £1/month for now and two from the same creditor trading under different names asking for full I&E which I haven't done.   In a moment of madness I managed to depsoit 5k to a gambling site I didn't have due to paypal's crazy policy of allowing payments which are to be collected by direct debit after a couple of days to gambling sites! Mad they allow this but this will show as a negative paypal balance (in a different account to the original "debt"). The first paypal -£5k account has been closed and passed to a DCA now. I have ignored them.   My council has appeared to have stepped up their collection efforts for £2.5k in alleged housing benefit overpayment from 2015/16. I have acknowledged their letters over the past 3 years each time by email but they rarely respond to my pleas. I truly think if there was overpayment then it was for less than half the amount they claim. At the time I didn't think I was being overpaid because I wasn't really working but I had stopped claiming JSA/ESA (and told them as much) but earned a couple of hundred pounds a month from sporadic work.   Also what I thought was a dormant debt from 2016 to Halifax has been actually sold ( to caboot? I think. Hard to keep track of everyone)   I've been getting phone calls daily but ignoring them for the most part. I did request all communication in writing in my original letters.   I feel incapable of dealing with these creditors and whilst initially I was feeling that I would be happy to just ignore all the letters (arreas, defaults and the like) and phone calls for an indefinite amount of time and  hope to make it 6 years to statute barred-ness and accept or defend any CCJ attempts that did arrive. I figured that avoiding these creditors for 3 months so far is 5% of the way there to statute barred! But I figre for these fairly sizeable amounts they probably won't all let it go and I will get some CCJ docs (never had to deal with that) However now my mood and thinking has changed.    I am looking again at insolvency. I'm over the DRO limit now so its BR or nothing. I was wondering why you said to not consider this and it would be stupid @dx100uk? Although shirking my debts/responsibilities it does seem like an "easy" way out at the moment. It would be so nice to know that what's done is done and to be able to draw a line in the sand and start again in a year or so and not have to avoid creditors or worry about what's coming next...   It certainly would help the environment what with the amount of letters that are arriving already(!) considering the first payment I missed was october/november (excluding the old halifax and council debts). I am exordinately stressed about it now even though I thought I would be already . Any advice would be great if it was to get my head out of the sand and contact people/do the ignoring thing and seeing what happens/reasons  to do or not to do bankruptcy for these unsecured debts?   Thanks      
    • Hi everybody   Had a knock on my door and was confronted by either a Bailiff or enforcement agent (not sure about the specific job title). When I opened the door he stuck his foot in so I couldn't close the door. I was video taping him so I took a few steps backward (to get him in shot) and he just fully entered the property despite me saying that I was denying him entry and he refused to leave thereafter.   Turns out that he was there to collect a court issued fine. I think from a Magistrates Court. He worked for this outfit:   www.marstonholdings.co.uk   The reason for the fine was something to do with "driving without car insurance". Now I had a cheap car a few years ago but it broke down and would cost more to fix than it was actually worth. So I sold the car for scrap and cancelled the insurance. Turns out you have to inform the DVLA when you scrap a car and them that it is no longer on the road (I was unaware). So this was the circumstances of the visit.   My question is did he have the lawful right to enter the property? I always thought these people were like vampires i.e. they can only come in if you invite them in.   tia Bear  
    • oppss again then if its the same person.   knows the road well so should know what the speeds are and where they apply..      
  • Our picks

orchardw

Previous tenants Shell Energy debt now appear in my name.

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

thank you for looking at my post first of all. 

I will need some advice regarding the outstanding energy bill left behind by my tenant.

 

First of all, I am a landlord and evicted the tenant September 2019. 

Tenant moved out on September and subsequently, I (Landlord) have found out that the energy bill has been sent to my property addressing different name (not the tenant name).

 

After multiple phone calls to resolve it, it was found that the tenant has not been paying the energy bill for the entire year and register to the energy company using another person's name, (i.e. not the tenant name on the contract I had rented to).

 

I as Landlord has made all the important phone call to the Shell Energy company to ensure to report the tenant has moved out and provided the tenancy contract as part of the evidence to support.

 

However, after 3 months later, I as the landlord has received a letter from the MIL debt collector on behalf of Shell Energy for collecting the outstanding debt that cost £902 left behind by the previous tenant despite all the phones call and emails have been sent to Shell Energy in last 3 months. 

 

But all of a sudden Shell Energy has appointed the MIL debt collector without speaking to me and the most disgusting issue is, the Shell Energy has passed my personal information such as address and name to the MIL debt collector in which, I had not owed Shell Energy any outstanding amount.

 

We will be going to get hold of the customer service and speak to them next week to ensure such issue to be resolved,

however I would like to find out, is that legal for Shell Energy to pass my personal information to debt collector without my consent or without  having conversation with me to ensure this is genuinely a mistake by Shell Energy because the current utility bill has been re-assigned under the my name since the tenant has moved out. 

 

Also, from now onward, MIL debt collector will have a record of mine which I don't happy at all because I will need to ensure the debt collector does not store any of my personal information in their database as I did not owe any of the outstanding amount but the previous tenant which should take care of the utility bill.

 

Can someone please advice how can put some bold words (in term of GDPR) if indeed, it is illegal for Shell Energy to disclose my personal information and to ensure they will not repeat such mistake or appointing the MIL debtor to repeatedly sending harassment letter to my property please?

 

Thanks,

Orchard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use GDPR to your advantage.
 

Don’t speak to them by phone. Send them a GDPR SAR. They will either comply , in which case you will be able to see what has been going on and hopefully get to the bottom of this.

 

If they fob you off just tell them in writing you will report them to the ICO. It’s fairly possible the prospect of a multi million pound fine for non compliance will persuade them to drop the whole thing.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to the very important SAR above, you should also write to them – separately in a separate envelope – a letter rejecting the fact that you are indebted to them and that you have not been an energy user at that address. They probably won't pay any attention but it's important have a paper trail.

In addition to the advice not to use the telephone – if for some reason rather you decide that you need to then you should first of all have read our customer services guide and implementing the advice there. If you make phone calls or receive phone calls without having implemented the advice in our customer services guide then you will regret it at some point


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/legitimate-interests/what-is-the-legitimate-interests-basis/

 

Quote

When do individuals’ interests override ours?

Even if the processing might have a negative impact on the individual, this does not automatically mean that their interests always override yours. This depends on the severity of the impact, and whether it is warranted in light of your purpose. Your interests do not always have to be in harmony with those of the individual, and if you have a more compelling interest this may justify some impact on individuals.

Example

A finance company is unable to locate a customer who has stopped making payments under a hire purchase agreement. The customer has moved house without notifying the finance company of their new address. The finance company wants to engage a debt collection agency to find the customer and seek repayment of the debt. It wants to disclose the customer’s personal data to the agency for this purpose.

The finance company has a legitimate interest in recovering the debt it is owed and in order to achieve this purpose it is necessary for them to use a debt collection agency to track down the customer for payment owed.

The finance company considers the balancing test and concludes that it is reasonable for its customers to expect that they will take steps to seek payment of outstanding debts. It is clear that the interests of the customer are likely to differ from those of the finance company in this situation, as it may suit the customer to evade paying their outstanding debt.

However, the legitimate interest in passing the personal data to a debt collection agency in these circumstances would not be overridden by the interests of the customer. The balance would be in favour of the finance company.

However, if there is a serious mismatch between your interests and those of the individual (whose are stronger), the individual’s interests come first, for example where:

  • they would not reasonably expect the processing;
  • they would be likely to object to the processing;
  • the processing would have a significant impact on them;
  • the processing would prevent them exercising their rights; or
  • the data you are processing is particularly sensitive, for example special category data, criminal offence data, or children’s data.

However the outcome will depend on the circumstances of the case.

For more practical guidance on how to assess the balancing test, read the section on How do we apply legitimate interests in practice?.

 

 

However - If they Collection Agency have made you the debtor incorrectly when it should have been someone else then you are free to complain and ask them under what circumstances they have been permitted to do this.


 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the advice. I had already sent an email to both Shell Energy (Utility) and MIL Collections (DCA) to complain that the name on the account is incorrect and should be under the tenant's name. I decided not to phone Shell Energy and just sent SAR to both Shell Energy and MIL Collections (both by email and post).

 

Is there anything else more I can do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a zipped archive of communications, emails, calls, notes around the account of the previous tenant from Shell Energy.

 

The most interesting part to focus on is the notes on the account that Shell Energy/MIL Collections are trying to retrieve.

 

According to their records, the case has been closed for MIL Agency

(presumably when I have phoned twice to ask why I kept getting letters as "Owner Occupier")

and then reopened (exported) back to MIL Agency.

 

Shell Energy supplied me the files they received with regards to the tenant and the tenancy agreement.

However, there are no notes to say that were going to apply account to me or even the previous tenant.

Also there are a number of calls missing from the archive making enquiries about the "Owner Occupier" letters from MIL collections.

 

I have been given a customer care resolution email address, which I am planning to email with regards to at least get them to apply the previous tenant's name to the account and ask not to attempt to charge me and the property.

 

There is also the issue that Shell Energy of sending my details without contacting me.

Shell Energy claim they have sent email/letter/SMS according to their notes,

for which I have received

nothing in my email account relating to that account,

no letters addressed to me

nor the one SMS message they claim they sent.

 

As I said before the only communication regarding the account was from MIL collections on January 8th.

Shell Energy told me I could safely ignore the "Owner Occupier" letters.

 

How should I proceed with regards to GDPR here?

Are they breaking any rules here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so sorry can we just clarity..

you haven't infact received any demands to pay the bill in your name on any letters , just to 'the occupier'

but, and I somewhat agree, you object to shell passing your pers details to MIL DCA.

 

sorry if I've read it wrong but better to check..


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's ok, the January 8th letter was the first demand addressed to my name from MIL DCA.

Edited by orchardw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from?

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from MIL DCA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

then yes your target is most certainly shell under GDPR 

 

there are plenty here more expert than me in hitting that nail hard and poss getting compo too.

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you also clarify that the information you have received in post#6 was the Previous Tenants account/email information etc. (not when they changed the account by replacing previous tenants name with yours )

 

If the above is correct and you have been provided with the Previous Tenants Data to do with that specific account, then you had no legal right to that information/data provided as you are not the Data Subject the previous tenant that opened the account is. 

 

If they have done the above and provided you with the previous tenant data then I think you need to have a chat with the Information Commissioners Office (ICO): https://ico.org.uk/

 

 


How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To clarify, they have no details of the previous tenant or may chosen not to disclose that information. I can assume only they never registered with shell. (I was using a full managed service with a letting agency)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont assume the latter, it may be true but will only muddy the water if you make such allowances.

At some point you may have some serious questiosn to ask the lettings agency but get this knocked on the head first

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

As has been said you really need to use the GDPR to your advantage in this situation as from your thread they have processed your data without your knowledge or consent and the buck stops with shell as they employed the services of Mil in recovery and passed said data to them.

 

You need to think to yourself did they have the lawful right to process your data by not just changing the previous tenant account into your name but sending Mil to recover that money owed as you were never the Data Subject of that Account the previous tenant was.

 

The GDPR is your friend here and you need to use it against them.

 

This is the link I like to provide as it explains/breakdown the GDPR in better terms to understand ensure to have a good read: https://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/index.htm

 

Did they have a Lawful Right to Process your Data look at Article 6:
https://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/article-6-lawfulness-of-processing-GDPR.htm

 

Did they have a Lawful Right by Consent to process your Data look at Article 7:
https://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/article-7-conditions-for-consent-GDPR.htm

 

Then you need to have a very good read on Right to Rectification and Erasure from Article 16 - 20

 

Then you need to have a very good read on Right to Object and Automated individual decision-making Article 21 - 22

 

Any correspondence to Shell needs to be directed to there Data Controller so you need to title any letter to the Data Controller of Shell

 

Shell Energy Data Controller info:

 

Data Controller
Shell Energy
Shell Energy House
Westwood Business Park
Westwood Way
Coventry
CV4 8HS

 

Email: dpo@shellenergy.co.uk

 

I would also remind them that they are also in breach of their own Privacy Policy as you have never been the Data Subject to the previous tenants account: https://www.shellenergy.co.uk/?&promo=GOOGLEBRAND&bblpc=ppc&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIjcWj6t2s5wIVhbTtCh1Eqg_dEAAYASAAEgIOlPD_BwE   (bottom of webpage click on Privacy Policy which is an automatic PDF Download)


How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...