Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Centrica/CST claimform - Industrial Training Bond ***Claim Discontinued***


BadMojo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 377 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Their phone number still doesn't work, so I've emailed them briefly explaining my situation. I've told them I'm receiving help from Step Change (which I am) and that I'm keen to reach a resolution that avoids the courts. I've told them I'll be in touch once I've received guidance from Step Change, but invited them to contact me in the meantime....

Edited by BadMojo
Link to post
Share on other sites

i would directly approach them wanting to settle if they DROP the claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been chatting with another guy that left shortly before me. He hasn't received court papers, but he didn't ignore the DCA letter like I did. He replied asking for written proof that he agreed to the training bond, which they haven't supplied. The same for another guy he is in contact with. 

 

He assures me that the page regarding the training bond, with the table of sliding scale repayments, did not form part of the original employment contract which we signed (digitally) when offered the jobs (back in March/April).

 

He says those documents were presented to us in person at the training academy a few weeks into the job. We were told if you don't sign these, you don't get the job. They required hand written signatures. I don't recall the details, but regardless, they haven't sent those documents to me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well find or request written proof that these must be signed in person..wet ink? Shall we say..that should help your case.

 

i dont doubt it either so it might be down to how the judge interprets each witness statement.. 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Centrica have responded and asked me to discuss repayment options with the DCA. Not the response I was hoping for. 

 

I hope I don't find myself in front of a judge! 

Edited by BadMojo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be the best thing if the training bond must be signed in ink..go prove that ..as i said earlier you could be the sacrificial lamb test case here before everyone else..what about the union? 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No but you were and they should know. You are entitled to ask

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've learnt that 3 other people have now received court papers from the DCA

 

All attempts by me to discuss the matter directly with the claimant (Centrica) are hitting brick walls. They are telling me I must deal with the DCA (CST Law). 

Edited by BadMojo
Link to post
Share on other sites

No one has received claimforms from a DCA. The debt has not been sold. The claimant is centrica. CST are solicitors who represent clients 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

only the owner of a debt can take anyone to court represented by a solicitor (like CST LAW) ...until you got the court claim on the 14th the correct action was taken ..ignore (bar you missed replying to the Letter of Claim which you should not have and thats why don't ignore that was mentioned)

 

don't miss your defence filing date.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm considering my options as I cannot see any way to avoid having to pay them. So, either I email CST offering an amount in full and final settlement, or monthly payments. In either case, is it advisable to enclose a copy of my financial situation (possibly use the paperwork they included in the LOC?) in support of said offer?

 

Step Change have suggested a repayment plan to cover my credit card debts, but separately suggested I make a monthly offer to CST/Centrica to cover that 'debt' first.

Edited by BadMojo
Link to post
Share on other sites

slow down, you've not even filed your defence yet, which IMHO should include a line which states the you never signed the training sheet and it was not presented at time of online signup. it won't cost you very much more to run this claim till witness statement time rather than give in, it could be a game changer for everyone that is in the same boat.

 

as for you card debts start a new thread, don't go agreeing to anything without requesting signed CCA request s esp if the debts are years old.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

GMB (the union I was in whilst at BG) has not replied to my email.

 

Unite (my current union) has offered to put me in touch with the union solicitors for a free 30min initial consultation.

 

Nothing further to report at this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well when you get it don't waste time concentrate on this unsigned training agreement i'm pretty sure this will win you this case.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I confirm some dates, namely when I need to file my defence...This is from the MCOL webite AOS (Acknowledgement of Service)...

 

'If you file an acknowledgment of service but do not file a defence within 28 days of the date of service of the claim form, or particulars of claim if served separately, judgment may be entered against you'

 

Date of Service of claim form - the date on the claim form is the 13th July. So 28 days from that gives me - 9th August 2021 (if you count 13th as day 1). Is that correct? It's just that earlier in the thread (post #46) I worked it out as the 13th August (33 days?)

 

Update:

 

I've received an email from Centrica Collections, in response to my request for copies of the paperwork provided/signed at the academy after starting. They have simply stated the paperwork I have already received is correct. No mention of the other paperwork at all, never mind providing it.

 

They have again asked me to contact Credit Style to arrange payment.

Edited by BadMojo
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 14/07/2021 at 18:24, BadMojo said:

 

date to submit defence = 13.08.2021 (33 days in total)

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The link provided says 33 days from date of claim. However form 'N9CPC Response Pack (04.14)' provided when I acknowledged the service, says I have 28 days from date of claim to submit a defence.

 

33 days from 13th July is actually the 14th August. (Error on my part)

 

28 days from 13th July is 9th August.

 

I'm just looking for clarification. Not picking holes.

Edited by BadMojo
Link to post
Share on other sites

it is a total of 33 days from the date on the claimform to right (take being day 1 in the count)

 

claimforms are deemed to be served by mail in 5 days, + the 28 = 33.

this is all explained in the link you read and calculated correctly 

however as you day 33 is a Saturday, courts close at 4pm fridays so you must file by then the 13th

 

so in a little over a week (as long as you've done AOS on MCOL as instructed) you need to be thinking about your defence and posting it up here well early for checking. 

 

you will need to pointout the crap POC and the fact they have not sent a detailed one as they have said, will also need to pointout in a round about way, that the training agreement is unsigned without giving the game away!!

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In what format must the defence be submitted?

Do I just draw up bullet points, or just use free text?

 

Do I have to be very specific, or use legalese?

Can I be more emotive and use circumstantial arguments, like 'so-and-so only had to pay £xxx when he left', or would that require statements from so-and-so?

 

I've started working on the defence. There are lots of threads on this forum. I have to admit, they all seem pretty different, e.g parking fines, catalogue debts, etc, but I'll come up with something and come back.

 

I was speaking to an ex-colleague earlier today (he's also received the claim/impending court action form) and he's working on his defence too. He's in touch with more people than I am and he's learnt that there are dozens of others that have also received letter before action/of claim, and/or actual claim (court) letters. So it seems Centrica are well aware of what they're doing and have instructed CST to hit out and get some money for them.

 

My current union (Unite) have told me, well, their solicitors have told me, there's not much they can do and suggested I should reach out again to the GMB, who were my union when I was with BG. So I've got the number of the union rep and I'm going to text him tomorrow; ask if he's aware of what's going on and if GMB have had any involvement, or can provide any advice, assistance, or information - you never know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No legalese needed, just a very basic short generic defence poss mentioning the crap poc they have filed and that to date there is no signed agreement to the training.

 

I'm sure @Andyorch will help during the week but do go use our enhanced google search box on our page and type in say claimform loan

 

that will give you most of the generic para's that should be in all defence s

 

post your idea up here well in advance and we can fine tune it

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not parking fines..but thats immaterial to you at present. But important to remember just in case.

 

Base yours on say a loan or card claimform defence the std paras to use will be the same.  No rush!!

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I have previously mentioned, I requested some paperwork directly from Centrica and they emailed me my employment contract and a breakdown of the claim.  Does this mean I cannot refer to the lack of documentation from CST Law in relation to the matter (CPR 31.14), specifically a signed agreement relating to the training bond and any paperwork provided/signed at the academy? It might be splitting hairs, but if I can I will; but if I shouldn't, I won't. 

 

This is what I have so far. I'll admit to finding it a bit of a struggle filtering out clauses/paragraphs in the plethora of threads on other matters, e.g. credit agreements, parking tickets, etc.:

 

Your claimant’s claim in respect of an overpayment of salary/expenses is without merit and is denied its entirety.

 

Your letter of claim dated 8th June (not delivered until 22nd June and therefore in breach of Pre-Action Protocol) and claim form dated 13th July, reference particulars that have not been provided and furthermore, have still not been provided, despite my requesting them from CST Law (pursuant to CPR 31.14).

 

No evidence as to my liability for the alleged overpayment has been provided: Specifically, no proof as to the overpayment of salary, or expenses.

 

No signed agreement specific to the repayment of any training costs, or sums therein, has been provided, nor was incorporated into the original employment contract. (Can I state this if I am saying I have not received any documents?) Regardless, the pursuit of any such costs is nothing more than a speculative charge, a penalty to disproportionally punish a breach of contract, and therefore without merit and unenforceable. Thus, the claimant is put to strict proof to evidence its cause of action and contractual costs and what loss it has suffered.

 

 

Edited by BadMojo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...