Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Also, here is a link https://www.hestia.org/domestic-abuse    
    • Here is the app from the play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.newtonmobile.hestia&hl=en   I think there is an equivalent on the Apple store. I think it provides advice and contacts but I also heard somewhere that it allows you to keep some kind of log. I think keeping a log is extremely important – especially if there is any doubt as to whether one is going to be believed.
    • On the Middlesbrough Council portal a search for "Excel" - "Excel Parking Services" - "Excel Parking Services Ltd" produced no results. A search for "The Leisure Fund Ltd" brought up a request for planning permission for a building extension.
    • I'm afraid that I'm not especially familiar with the injunctions and orders et cetera that are available in these kinds of buried difficult situations. What I am pretty certain of is that if there is some kind of proceedings began while the partner is still living in the home then that will increase tensions to an intolerable level and also increase any danger. I think this would mean that they would have to be a move to have the abusive partner excluded from the home. How many children are there and why should she be worried that the children might be taken away? I have to say that if the children are living in a situation where they are aware that there is this level of abuse between their parents then it can only be extremely damaging to them and the sooner the matter was resolved and the home became a peaceful and stable environment for them, the better. I think this would absolutely require the removal of the abusive partner. If the police have already been made aware of his abusive behaviour then it seems to me that the presumption will be in favour of her remaining at the home with her children. One thing she should certainly do is start to keep a detailed log of what is going on. She needs to be extremely careful that this log is not discovered and in fact I think that there is an app which maybe allows a log to be kept and is stored off the phone and in the cloud somewhere. I will check it out and come back. I very much hope that there will be others who have experience of this kind of thing either because they have been in this kind of situation or else because they have supported somebody who is in that situation who will be able to come along and give better advice. Can you tell us more about the children please. I think that their well-being might be pivotal to finding a solution to the whole problem
    • Hi All,   Not sure if this is the correct section to post in, please move if it isn't.   During the storm over the last couple of days I noticed a tiled on the shed roof had slipped and opened a hole, on close inspection it turns out they are Asbestos tiles. Nowhere in our survey did it state that and we weren't informed during the sale period.   This is our first house so I had no idea what Asbestos looked like and didn't suspect a thing, we just new the roof looked a little worse for wear and would plan to replace it once settled in etc.   I am assuming this is now going to cost a lot more to have removed and replaced, and we would of factored the cost in when we made the offer on the property.   Is there anything I can do in regards to either the Surveyors or the Estate Agents to have the costs either contributed to or covered ?   Thanks
  • Our picks

cagedbird

Excel/BW ANPR PCN - i paid! - Providince St Wakefield WF1 3BG By cagedbird

Recommended Posts

they have sent you the wrong cut and paste letter and it is clear they havent spoken to their clients either. They are trying to blindside you into paying up as they get a wedge out of anything you send.

I would suggest that you wait for a lba and then tell them agin waht a bunch of wazzocks they are for being unable to read or count.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found it a bit strange when reading it. They repeated, almost verbatim, some of the contents of the responses from Excel. They probably share the same documents to cut and paste from.

I'm going to have a good Christmas and New Year and look forward to their next feeble attempts at bullying.

All the best, and look forward to the next thrilling instalment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will and John, the worlds cleverest solicitors at Gladstones are also Will and John, owners of the IPC, the worlds dodgiest ATA for parking. The reason the letters look the same is they probably wrote the originals for Excel to copy from.

 

Understand, they are not honest brokers, they act for their client and their cliet as solicitors are members of the club that charges then for pushing them towards the lawyerly aspect of their life. They amke money regardless of whether the parking co loses it for following their crap advice.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, here we are a year and three days on. The sleepy little highwayman decides to wake up.

Today I received the Letter Before Claim (attached).

Are ELMS Legal new to the scene, or one of the other cronies under a new guise?

 

Many Thanks.

 

LetterBeforeClaim.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thread tidied.

 

elms … urm.. looks like a one man band armchair advocate..doesn't appear to be registered as a solicitor on mainstream authorities sites like SRA/FCA.

 

I can't find the real name behind the firm name.

 

let me pull a spies chain.

 

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote
Tel:
 
In-house Solicitor at:
Vehicle Control Services Ltd
2 Europa Court,
Sheffield,
South Yorkshire,
S9 1XE,
England
View in Google Maps
Roles at other organisations

 

https://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/person/67740/edmund-jonathan-garvey-shoreman-lawson


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes other spies have found these out:

note the last comment;;;

 

ELMS Legal Ltd
31 Handley Street
Sleaford
England
NG34 7TQ

 

Company Number: 09160334

 

Director: Ed Jonathan Garvey Shoreman-Lawson

 

Companies House link: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09160334

 

Endole link: https://suite.endole.co.uk/insight/company/09160334-elms-legal-limited

 

BizDb link: https://www.bizdb.co.uk/company/landlords-lawyer-ltd-09160334/

 

CILEx Regulation ID: 2164466, Edmund Shoreman-Lawson
(at this link: https://cilexregulation.org.uk/firms/  click on 'Firm Directory' its an auto PDF download
then open PDF and go down to ELMS Legal Ltd

 

Authorised by CILEx Regulation for Civil Litigation: Authorisation No: 2164466

 

Law Society link (Edmund Jonathan Garvey Shoreman-Lawson): https://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/person/67740/edmund-jonathan-garvey-shoreman-lawson

 

SRA - ELMS Legal Limited (on the link check SRA-regulated people and roles whose name it is)
https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/check-and-find-a-solicitor/solicitors-register/organisation/?sraNumber=630494#headingTwo

 

SRA - Edmund Jonathan Garvey Shoreman-Lawson (look at where this person works, VCS, MIL Collections)
https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/check-and-find-a-solicitor/solicitors-register/person/?firstName=Edmund&lastName=Jonathan&sraNumber=537827

 

Linkedin link: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/edmund-shoreman-lawson-34557b127

 

This guy does use different versions of his name from full name to leaving some off name.

 

What you will notice is Mr Edmund Jonathan Garvey Shoreman-Lawson himself is SRA Regulated but ELMS Legal Limited, Vehicle Control Services Ltd & MIL Collection Limited are all not SRA Regulated.

  • Thanks 2

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A read of the legislation for county courts will provide you with conflicting info on who may represent a person at court 

 

My reading is this bloke may pitch up in person but not an employee of the company.

At this stage anyone can fill out letters as the representative.

 

Read up on MIL Collectiosnsand you will see that they have history and a track record of LOSING

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you all had a good Christmas and New Year!

Thanks to all for your input.

 

Here's my proposed response:

 

With reference to your letter of December 2019, reference as above, its contents are acknowledged.

The matter has been passed to yourselves after BW Legal’s failed attempts to bully me into submission; using lies, mistruths and threats of legal proceedings. Perhaps they saw the error of their ways - perhaps not!

As before, I’ll keep this simple so as to avoid confusion.

The Particulars of Debt in your letter are unsubstantiated.

We parked, I paid.


As your client insists on taking Court action, then please advise them that I will make a request to the Court for full costs due to unreasonable behaviour (CPR Part 27.14(2)(g)).

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Respnd as follows

 

Dear sirs,

I would look forward to seeing you in court but as you have no right of audience in the capacity you correspond in that wont happen.

Tell your client that they know there is no cause for action and they are in breach of the GDPR for obtaining my data so it should be me sending  them threatograms rather than some lickspittle earning a less than honest crust threatening me.

If they have any sense, which would be a very rare thing for a parking company, they will now drop the matter rather than suffer a full costs recovery order for their unreasonable conduct and vex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Tell your client that they know there is no cause for action and they are in breach of the  GDPR for obtaining my data 

 

The data was obtained pre-GDPR. The PCN was issued on the 14th May 2018, with GDPR becoming effective on the 25th May 2018. Unless it can be applied retrospectively, I feel this is a moot point.

 

Just found an interesting article : https://www.vsec.infinigate.co.uk/blog/according-to-the-gdpr-it-is-in-force-already :

 

Quote

 

The final commandment that is article 99 reads:

  1. - This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official - Journal of the European Union.
  2. - It shall apply from 25 May 2018.

One number short of an upside-down mark of the beast, the 99th article suggests that the GDPR has been in force since the twentieth day subsequent to its publication, that being the 17th of May 2016. Yet, its application is not honoured until two years after.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry 

they won't know any diff send the snotty letter.

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the write DPA/GDPR instead. As they are STILL processing your data it is factual to say GDPR alone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...