Jump to content


LPS/Gladstones Windscreen claimform - walked off site - Regent retail park, Loughborough, LE11 5PF


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 429 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you 

 

I am the registered keeper of vehicle

Xxxxx and deny liability for the entirety of the claim.

The particulars of the Claim disclose no cause of action on the following grounds:

 

1.    It is denied that the driver of vehicle XXXXXX parked in breach of the terms of parking stipulated on the signage at Regents Retail Park on 16thSeptember 2018. 

 

2.    No contract was formed or agreed between the driver and Local Parking Security Limited. 

 

3.    This claim has no course of action against the defendant or anyone else. 

 
  •  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Course of action, a clause is something in a contract.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you remember exactly what the signs said it is difficult to go with anything specific

 

My suggestion is:

 

1.The defendant denies being the driver at the time and as the claimant has failed to create a keeper liabilty by way of a proper  notice sent out under the POFA 2012  there is no cause for action against the defendant.

 

 2.  The notice to keeper is deficient in key phrases as required by the POFA 2012 so it fails to create ANY liability for the charge.

 

3. IN ANY CASE  there was no breach of contract as the parking terms offered free customer parking for a specified time and the claim is for monies due as the driver failed to display a purchased ticket when no ticket is required. This means thers is no cause for action against the driver or anyone else.

 

4 As the claim is entirely without merit the defendant asks that he receives a full costs recovery order under CPR 27.14.2(g) as the claimant knows or should know that it is vex

 

that will do for the moment.

 

BW may well drop the hot potato now but to make sure I would send a copy of your reply to both them and their client as well as court.

 

Dont use the PO Box address, look up their registered address via their companies house  registration

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I have uploaded photos of the signs.

It is a car park I have used frequently and has always had the same terms. 
 

I have found a picture of the actual ticket and sign on the day.

It does state the reason as not parking without displaying a valid ticket,

 

it looks like 'off-site' might be referring to the name of the car park?

Scanbot 12 Dec 2019 20.28.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

there's no proof you haven't been there for more than 2 hrs though...how weird

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, if that is so then they have failed to identify the land as I have looked on google and streetview and can find no such place in Loughborough. that is all you need to know

 

if they are claiming that the driver went off site then 

(1) it is immaterial and (

2) they have failed to show evidence of this so cant claim now that they have incorrectly issued a ticket and court claim but want to correct it so they dont lose their money without an appearance.

 

The wording of the sigange is garbage anyway and so is that ticket if they want it to mean the driver breached the contract by going off site without paying.

 

Do not try to do their job for them, deal with what you have rather than trying to find reasons to justify their claim.

 

They arent honest or decent, their operative has issued a dud ticket but they still want paying because they have spent money collecting and processing your data without good reason and now wont drop it until you make them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just put in your short defence and let them worry as they would be hoping that you will have wet yourself and paid up or just hid under a blanket and thus give them a default judgement.

 

You are going to make them pay and pay again for their folly so stick with it and until you have to exchange witness statements you let them waste their time and money.

 

Next you send BWL a letter

asking for sight of their client's contract with the landowners that allows them to enter into contacts with the public and to make civil claims in their own name.

you also ask for sight of the planning permission for their sigangae and equipment.

 

BWL will either ignore or respond that as it is small claims they dont have to but the track hasnt been allocated yet and if you are rich you might feel like going fask track and hire a barrister for £1k and bill them when you whip them.

 

In the real world you will use this to state in your WS that you dont believe they have the necessary permissions because they havent produced them in a CPR 31.14 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted the CPR to the solicitor last week with a £1 postal order. They have responded today stating that they will not accept my offer of £1 for settlement!!!

They've not acknowledged that the CPR request and are saying that I offered a £1 settlement, which I didn't. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where doesnt any of our instructions say send £1 with a cpr?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There has never been a requirement for a fee with a cpr request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

consumer credit debt CCA request not CPR for a private parking claim

always best to read instructions posted in this thread rather than 'what I think I might have possibly done before'

don't slip back into your old habit of making simple schoolboy silly mistakes like you have before

else these sharks will avoid your harpoons.

 

did you file your defence on mcol website?

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the reasoning was put in my post #34, is that not clear as to why and what to expect?

Please read things carefully and stick to the absolutes rather than reading things quickly and deciding that you have the gist of things.

 

read a lot more threads on parking as well, not just those involving your mob but a couple of hundred so you can get a feeling for how things go

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

Should I have heard something by now?

Defence was due on 13th Dec, we have received confirmation that it has been sent to the claimant but nothing else.

I’m not sure how much the timelines are affected by Xmas.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

now go read the letter from the court again...carefully!

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but courts are running late following the holidays. they always do.

 

but anyway, nothing for you to do unless you receive your N180/N149A

 

get reading up.

 

just about any claimform threads will help.

 

CAR is self help too….

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

holidays dont count when it comes to timescales.

If you have 14 days to do somehting you have just that, not 16 days because there was a full moon that week or whatever.

 

Do your bit properly and you can then take them to task for not doing theirs right.

as they are a company that sues lots of people they wont be given much leeway by many judges

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...