Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/morgan - cap1 card CCJ & AOE payments- admit they were wrong - offered £150!


Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1373 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

Hi,

There is quite a lot regarding my current issues, I shall try be as clear and concise as possible.

 

Dec 2008 - unemployed, applied for £250 credit card from Capital One.

Jan 2009 - accepted for £1000.

Credit card maxed in a matter of days mainly on gambling and drugs.

 

Called after 5 months activation to remind them I was unemployed and the card was unaffordable.

Some sort of payment plan arranged which was rarely upheld by myself, sporadic minimal payments.

 

2010 - credit limit raised to £1600 without my request.

Again all spent on gambling and drugs.

Vast proportion of spends on statement show gambling sites.

Repayments often withdrawals direct from said gambling sites.

 

2013 - Mother pays off £1400, notes state student, zero income, unaffordable, mother cut up card.

Me and my mother ask for account to be closed but this does not show in notes.

Called back once to query any PPI.

 

8 months later promotional material sent to my door advising account has been upgraded, cashback offer, etc.

I ticked the box and sent the form back.

 

Requested new 'lost' card.

Again spent completely on gambling £1600+.

 

Many payday loans taken out to try pay back.

 

StepChange charity seeked by myself and was paying them back.

Had to cancel this repayment plan as I was again unemployed and it was unaffordable.

 

Debt being chased by Apex.

Debt returned to Capital One, they send a letter advising it is with them unless notified otherwise.

 

2016 - Debt sold to Cabot without notification.

Apparently Cabot sent a Capital One headed letter through a third party printing company, which was not received.

 

Oct 2016 - Dispute letter sent to Cabot.

 

2018 - CCJ issued.

Call Capital One to request my application form as I was sure I was unemployed and thought I may need evidence for Court.

Incorrect documents sent 7 times, speak to manager who suggests sending SAR and raised a complaint for me.

Can't believe contents of SAR, various other complaints raised, investigated and rejected by Capital One.

Clear written permission to take to Financial Ombudsman.

 

March 2019 - Court, threatened with prison or full in AoE form. Form filled in.

£50 a month taken from wages by Morgan Clarke.

Disputes raised with Cabot, AoE eventually suspended.

Query dispute letter with no response for over 2 years,

 

CCJ is now offered to be removed but they intend to keep the AoE money and offer me minimal compensation.

 

Now major issues with FOS.

As some of the complaints relate to over 6 years ago,

state they will not investigate,

although Capital One have given consent for this,

FOs believe this is not consent but a referral.

 

Account balance stands at £1700+ although the value of account minus interest and other (some now illegal) charges, I work out £4.31.

 

No fixed address, they have my mother's where I do stay sometimes, mainly stay at friends, sofa surf, etc.

 

Lots more issues and lots of evidence.

Don't know where to turn.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Cap1 card , Morgan/Cabot, FOS
  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i will guess that your complaint was one against Cap1 which for want of a better term was along the lines of an Irresponsible Lending claim and quite rightly so!!

 

Regardless to the FOS not being interested, did Cap1 agree that they were in the wrong?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

No Capital One skirted around the issue and produced my apparent application form showing an income of £10,000 (which I very well may have entered at the time) but now also an extra income of £40,000 (which I certainly did not enter).

 

The FOs have stated in some of their correspondence that they are not investigating the irresponsible lending complaint as "I should have know I was irresponsibly lent to", and now is over 6 years since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so cabot have agreed to removed the CCJ and aren't going to demand further payment?

but, I assume you asked for AOE payments return but they've refused? 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

Yes, as far as I'm aware they were attempting to keep the AoE payments and partially settle the CCJ.

 

Cabot:

However, in light of us not responding to your dispute and for us incorrectly taking legal action against you, I have taken the decision to close your account. I am sorry that this information was not taken into consideration when your complaint was originally investigated, I appreciate this has led to a delay in you receiving this resolution and for this I am sorry.

 

I would also like to send you a bank transfer for £150.00 which I hope you can accept with my sincere apologies for us incorrectly taking legal action against you and for not responding to your dispute sooner.

 

As I am satisfied that this is your account, I have accepted the payments you have made as a partial settlement towards the outstanding balance and this will be reflected on your credit file until 30 June 2020."

 

Although since then I have received a letter from Morgan Clarke to fill in and set aside the judgement, not sure of this is different to partially settling. I am yet to complete this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are they offering to set this aside by a mutual consent by a tomlin order free of charged to you?

or have they just sent you an N244 to fill in which will cost you £255 to file at court with no guarantee of success??

 

they have admitted that they wrongly took court action against you

IMHO I would not be agreeing to just £150 but threaten to take this back to court, issuing the N244 yourself and sue them for the £255 fee AND for the return of every payment you have ever made against the CCJ AND interest at 8% PA. and damage to you credit reputation, typically this is £1000 per entry and any compensation for refused credit , higher int rates on credit attained since...

 

pers I think it might be worthy for you to spend sometime

scan up everything to ONE multipage PDF file

read our upload guide carefully 

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Cabot/morgan - cap1 card CCJ & AOE payments- admit they were wrong - offered £150!
Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

Yes, I understand they are offering free of charge.

 

'we refer to the above matter.

We have been instructed by our client to make an application to the court to request that judgment be set aside.

 

To aid us in our application our client requests you consent.

If you are willing to accept the application please please sign both pages on the highlighted dotted lineunder your name and return one copy of the attached Consent Order.

 

The other copy is for you to retain for your own records.

If you are unsure as to the terms please seek independent legal advice."

 

I replied to Cabots earlier response offering the compensation advising I do not accept and that I would reply within 30 days (15 Nov).

 

I shall indeed look to upload all documents as you suggest although I have basically been 'arguing' with Cabot, Capital One, FOs and the Courts for over a year, lots of content.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - As part of closure of this account and as a sorry to incorrectly taking legal action, Get the CRA Entry removed completely.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

Hi,

Long story short,

FOS no longer dealing with me and closing any outstanding complaints including one with Cabot.

 

Had a solicitor send Cabot a CCA request in January which was ignored,

given multiple excuses

- no permission,

CCJ attached but they seem to have decided that they are not obligated to respond as there is no debt, apparently cleared.

 

CCJ has been completely removed from a search, not even showing as within last 6 years although I have others.

 

Inital FOs investigator previously recommended £750-£1000 compensation due to wrongfully Court action,

although they advised the debt clearance of £900+ (I was taken to Court for £1700+) and the initial £150 is sufficient.

 

as advised I am no longer dealing with the FOs nor agreed with any of their findings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

Hi,


My issue has been ongoing for years but will try summarise the main points.
Irresponsibly lent credit card from 2008, many major issues; terms, policies, laws neglected throughout.


Debt sale to Cabot without notification from CC company. No notice of assignment received.
2017 letters from Cabot threatening Court action.

Respond with CCA request, a template letter by post, nothing responded.
2018 CCJ obtained,

2019 Court summons

- threat of prison sentence or complete an attachment of earnings form on the 8th day following.

 

Cabot proceed to take unaffordable money from my wages.
Speak to Cabot regarding my recent circumstances,

they state of the original account and that I thought it had beeen a [problem] until Court

- eventually agree to suspend AoE around 6 months later although they took a further payment following the cancellation.

 

Request SAR from Cabot, advise they have not responded to my prior dispute letter, somebody else's well kept statement is included and other major issues.

 

Cabot eventually apologise for wrongfully taking Court action, offering £150 compensation.

I reject this and raise with the financial ombudsman service as instructed.


They eventually send me the apparant CCA fulfillment (over 2 years late) with, as I know now a NoA using a CC company's headed letter arranged by Cabot through a 3rd party printing company along with the booklet from Cabot, supposedly sent together although show different dates.

 

My dealings with the fos were already in full swing at this stage with multiple complaints being 'investigated' relating to the original CC.

I called out one too many of their accuracies/imbellishments in their communication leading them to refuse to deal with me and have now closed any remaining complaints including the one relating to Cabot admitting to wrongfully taking Court action.

 

Their initial response on this matter suggested £750-£1000 compensation although as they had offered to clear the debt of £900 (I was taken to Court for £1800) and £150 then that would be adequate.

 

Got a solicitor to act on my behalf and they send CCA request January 2020 which is again ignored.

Call Cabot to query and am given multiple excuses as to why they are not obligated;

CCJ, no debt, no credit agreement in place amongst others.

 

Push them on this asking for literature regarding and eventually speak to a manager who advises I can not have my money back,

they did not respond to my solicitor request as it was a CCJ at that point,

I ask when the CCJ was removed,

she checks and advises February 2020, the Court confirmed January 2020.

 

The CCJ has now been removed in and the debt apparently cleared, although I still appear to have an account with Cabot.

 

There is much more to this as a whole, I was rejected for less than basic housing due to having a CCJ a

 

Any advice, signposting would be much appreciated thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 threads merged on same issue.

so from advice given last December..

can you action post 7 please?

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

I knew I'd posted elsewhere by accident but couldn't remove. Wow noob question sorry, do I have to do anything with the post? Or get the last bit done? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 08/12/2019 at 01:42, dx100uk said:

are they offering to set this aside by a mutual consent by a tomlin order free of charged to you?

or have they just sent you an N244 to fill in which will cost you £255 to file at court with no guarantee of success??

 

they have admitted that they wrongly took court action against you

IMHO I would not be agreeing to just £150 but threaten to take this back to court, issuing the N244 yourself and sue them for the £255 fee AND for the return of every payment you have ever made against the CCJ AND interest at 8% PA. and damage to you credit reputation, typically this is £1000 per entry and any compensation for refused credit , higher int rates on credit attained since...

 

pers I think it might be worthy for you to spend sometime

scan up everything to ONE multipage PDF file

read our upload guide carefully 

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

get your doc up read above

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

I must have been looking at a different post 7 ha.

Didn't think I had the N244 option now that there is no CCJ or debt. Small claims now I suspect?

As mostly emails: print, scan, upload?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well lets see what cards we are playing with.

no need to print them and scan.

simply copy them to a word processor prog

redact your pers details or any emails/ref no's that can Id you

them save as .pdf and upload

read our upload guide carefully

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

Would I have to hide names, emails, numbers etc of the staff?

Also I'm not too concerned about my anonymity, would like these documents in the national press, would you still advise to protect any personal details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

because of site data protection, you must hide YOUR details

forget the rest.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

Dear Sir

 

 RE: Capital One Credit Card ending - Closed  

 

I am writing further to your complaint with the Financial Ombudsman Service (“FOS”) and your recent telephone calls.  

 

You have contacted us further because you wish to be provided with an answer to the following;  

 

• Why has the account been closed, instead of refunding you?

 

• Why have you not received a response to your dispute letter sent in 2017

 

• Why has Consumer Rights Solicitors not been provided with a response, following their CCA request

 

You wrote to us on 23 October 2017 and told us the account was in dispute, until we could evidence our claim.

Upon receipt of this letter, we referred it to Mortimer Clark Solicitors (MCS) to action, regrettably, no response was sent by MCS.

MCS informed us there is no record of this letter being received by them.

 

This error was reviewed by the FOS when we provided them with details of the account history, following your referral to their service.  

 

We concluded our position in the final response issued on 02 July 2019.

In reply to your correspondence, we also issued responses on 27 August 2019 and 15 November 2019.

These concerns were referred to the FOS as you remained unhappy with the outcome. 

 

When we completed the review and supplied the information to the FOS, the Complaint Handler confirmed the following;  

 

• An application was sent to the Court to set aside the CCJ (the Court has now approved our application)

•The Attachment of Earnings (AOE) was suspended. 

• We agreed to close the account. 

 

• We are not asking you to repay £1,427.68 (The outstanding balance assigned to us by Capital One was £1,658.48,

We received payments totalling, £230.00 this bring this balance down to £1,427.68.

The legal fees applied have been reversed)

 

• We have amended our entry on your credit file to reflect the account as partially satisfied

• In addition to closing the account, we offered a further £150.00 to apologise for any distress or upset caused. 

 

I have received a copy of the response sent to you by the FOS on 04 March 2020 and note they did not uphold your complaint as they felt the action taken was fair to put things right for the trouble and upset caused.

I have enclosed a copy for your reference.

 

I am aware following your notification, you have now withdrawn your complaint from their service. 

A CCA request was received in January 2020 from Consumer Rights Solicitors.

 

As a CCJ had been obtained, we were not obligated to comply with this request.

I am aware the CCJ has now been set aside, as confirmed in our telephone call on 19 May, MCS received confirmation of this by post on 13 February.

 

The account is closed and as such we are not obliged to comply with this request.  

 

These aspects have been reviewed, considered and the FOS have provided us with their view, as explained above.  

You have recently requested a copy of the telephone calls and information we hold on the account.

This has been referred to our dedicated team who will deal with this for you.

 

Please note, this can take one calendar month.

Please note, as they have already completed a Subject Access Request (SAR) in September 2019,

the information included in their response will be from the date the information was supplied previously until the date they complete the newest request.  

 

We intend to provide your SAR to your email address of.

Please let us know whether this method is not suitable in the next 30 days.

 

We will send you an email containing a link to obtain your documents, these will be available for you to obtain for a period of 7 days. 

 

Following my further review, whilst we maintain our position as set out in our previous letters,

in order to bring this matter to an amicable resolution, we would like to offer you a final payment of £500.00.

 

This represents a refund of the payments you made towards the account which total £230.80 and the remaining amount of £269.20 which represents the trouble and upset caused.

 

Please note this offer is not in addition to our previous offer of £150.00.

In addition, the account will remain closed. 

 

Please provide us with your bank details at your earliest convenience and we will arrange a BACS transfer for a total of £500.00. 

 

This is our final response to this matter and the complaint has therefore been closed, we will not reopen the complaint or investigate the same concerns any further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

im not spacing that!
 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DisgruntledDebtGuy

Wow sorry it didn't look that bad before posting...I'm learnding.

 

Managed to get back in touch with the Citizen's Advice guy I met with last year who is again looking into it and will arrange a meeting when life allows, they're hoping around 2 weeks, he asked if I had any time limits of which I'm unaware.

 

 

They're still refusing to produce the correct statement I requested October 2017 or even discuss it, baited into frustration

They are also refusing to talk to me on the phone unless it's to give my bank details for the £500.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude - They have set aside a CCJ. 

They have offered £500 of money as compo (Im aware of how it is broken down)

They have closed the account and set it as partially settled. 

 

Take it and run as fast as you can... But thats my advice. 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...