Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Also, here is a link https://www.hestia.org/domestic-abuse    
    • Here is the app from the play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.newtonmobile.hestia&hl=en   I think there is an equivalent on the Apple store. I think it provides advice and contacts but I also heard somewhere that it allows you to keep some kind of log. I think keeping a log is extremely important – especially if there is any doubt as to whether one is going to be believed.
    • On the Middlesbrough Council portal a search for "Excel" - "Excel Parking Services" - "Excel Parking Services Ltd" produced no results. A search for "The Leisure Fund Ltd" brought up a request for planning permission for a building extension.
    • I'm afraid that I'm not especially familiar with the injunctions and orders et cetera that are available in these kinds of buried difficult situations. What I am pretty certain of is that if there is some kind of proceedings began while the partner is still living in the home then that will increase tensions to an intolerable level and also increase any danger. I think this would mean that they would have to be a move to have the abusive partner excluded from the home. How many children are there and why should she be worried that the children might be taken away? I have to say that if the children are living in a situation where they are aware that there is this level of abuse between their parents then it can only be extremely damaging to them and the sooner the matter was resolved and the home became a peaceful and stable environment for them, the better. I think this would absolutely require the removal of the abusive partner. If the police have already been made aware of his abusive behaviour then it seems to me that the presumption will be in favour of her remaining at the home with her children. One thing she should certainly do is start to keep a detailed log of what is going on. She needs to be extremely careful that this log is not discovered and in fact I think that there is an app which maybe allows a log to be kept and is stored off the phone and in the cloud somewhere. I will check it out and come back. I very much hope that there will be others who have experience of this kind of thing either because they have been in this kind of situation or else because they have supported somebody who is in that situation who will be able to come along and give better advice. Can you tell us more about the children please. I think that their well-being might be pivotal to finding a solution to the whole problem
    • Hi All,   Not sure if this is the correct section to post in, please move if it isn't.   During the storm over the last couple of days I noticed a tiled on the shed roof had slipped and opened a hole, on close inspection it turns out they are Asbestos tiles. Nowhere in our survey did it state that and we weren't informed during the sale period.   This is our first house so I had no idea what Asbestos looked like and didn't suspect a thing, we just new the roof looked a little worse for wear and would plan to replace it once settled in etc.   I am assuming this is now going to cost a lot more to have removed and replaced, and we would of factored the cost in when we made the offer on the property.   Is there anything I can do in regards to either the Surveyors or the Estate Agents to have the costs either contributed to or covered ?   Thanks
  • Our picks

m1n1me

VCS PCN - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon

- I've received a parking charge notice from VCS

- grateful for any advice

 

- do I ignore/appeal?

Can VCS enforce the restricted zone in this way, covered under bylaws (I think)?

 

Driver didn't notice signage, vehicle wasn't actually stopped by double red lines (as pictured)

 

1 Date of the infringement 25/11/19

2 Date on the NTK 29/11/19

3 Date received 4/12/19

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? No

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes

6 Have you appealed? No

7 Who is the parking company? Vehicle Control Services (VCS)

8. Where exactly Bristol Airport - on "privately operated access roads", just outside car park barrier, not car park itself - stopped for 5 seconds to pick someone up, didn't pick them up and drove away when the camera van arrived.

Operate under IAS

 

Thanks in advance!

 

 

PCN Front.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG. Thank you for the information, it will help the guys to advise you. Please don't do anything until they've had a look and possibly asked questions.

 

While  you're waiting, you have other VCS airport threads for Liverpool and Southend, possibly others. It would be worth a read to understand how they operate.

 

Best, HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

stuff and all they can do

 

there are 100's of no stopping PCN threads here

have a read of a good few

use our search top right.

 

only ever respond if they send a letter of claim.

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

usual VCS chiselling and lies. 

read all about airport parking and prohibitive signage, grace periods etc and you will see what is wrong with this demand.

 

DO NOT respond to it,

get all of your info first and let them waste their time and money chasing you to no avail.

 

they know tey are wrong but hope you are one of the 85% who pay up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter received by registered keeper to say that due to "an administrative error" the incorrect contravention reason was on the PCN and that a new one would be issued - seems very suspicious to me.

 

Is there a time limit that the "replacement" PCN would need to be issued?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting question, I don't remember seeing a PCN being reissued on a thread here. Sit on your hands and wait to see what the experts think, please. :)

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant, against the POFA and also a breach of the GDPR as it means they have lied to the DVLA about why they have asked for your details.

 

Show us the new version by all means but it will be too late for them to even contemplate claiming a liability against the keeper.

 

Still simple Simon is a greedy liar who holds the law in contempt so dont be surprised if they do try and bully you into paying them.

 

All of this still doesnt change the basic facts though, there is no parking contract offered and the land is otherwise covered by byelaws

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its appear SRS has had some badnews about being able to issue speculative invoices for no stopping on byelaw land?


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean it has now been drilled into his thick head that he is just plain WRONG?

 

If hundreds of people complained to the ICO and DVLA about this co and this con in particular I'm sure that action would be taken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Subject Access Request submitted to the DVLA with one going to VCS as soon as they give up persuing this too...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to what point?

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont waste time and money on writing to VCS, you know what they know already and contacting them will only make them think that you love them and will pay them if they tell you another lie.

 

It isnt a SAR to the DVLA, it is a specific request as to who has accessed your keeper details and for what given purpose. the idea of this is so you can make a comaplaint about the laxity in allowing these bandits free rein when you can show that they lied to get your address.

Being specifi will speed things up and get the message across

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VCS being completely ignored :)

 

DVLA SAR partly out of interest, but more specific request will be sent if needed to get the information I need.

 

Thanks for everyone's comments/replies so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

your problemis it wont be on the SAR response

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New letter received - should a response be sent yet or still hold fire? Thanks!

Letter.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sit on your hands. They're trying to make it sound scary, hence the red ink. We call them threatograms. :)

 

The only thing to reply to is a Letter Before Claim/Action or a court form.

 

HB

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they did start proceedings after the 14 days, wouldn't they be in breach of the PAP anyway.  The £60 debt collection fee is unlawful, anyway as only driver not keeper can have anything else added to original charge.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@m1n1me, I am in exactly the same boat as you (Bristol Airport, Incorrect PCN, £60 debt cost). So am following your story closely!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

better to create your own topic please

hit create in the top red banner

 

dx

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the law is the same for all of these airport charges, they are not " relevant land" so  a keeper liability cannot be created and as the signage is prohibitive in nature there is no genuine offer of parking terms so the amout claimed is an unlawful penalty.

VCS make a lot of money this way and not a penny is legit so they will say and do anything to avoid the truth being widely known

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...