Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You wont see CIFAS on your CRA for something like this. You have to go direct to CIFAS for that. However... It is possible that they just closed your account because they werent comfortable about something but didnt trigger AMLR    
    • When I get my order confirmation  it does say guide price with a red * beside it and at the bottom of the order says the price you’ll be charged is the price on the day of delivery or collection.
    • OK.  It is highly likely that you will get your money back and the recording will have helped you.   The way that Hermes work on these cases is that they normally try to stall you and to test your resolve.   If it goes the normal way, they will file an acknowledgment of service within the 14 day limit and that will then buy them a further 14 days. Towards the end of the 14 days they will then file their  defence. At that point you will have to make a decision whether or not to pay your further fee in order to go on to have a hearing. For the value you are claiming the fee will be about £80 although you need to check the county court website to be sure.   In their defence, Hermes will have indicated that they are prepared to go to mediation. Please read up what we have to say about mediation. Hermes will treat this as an opportunity to try and beat you down and to reduce the amount that they have to pay you. as long as you stand by your guns, they will eventually back down and they will pay you your entire claim including the fees in order to avoid going to to a hearing.   It is in respect of the mediation  the recording that you have will be helpful. Let me say that Trading Standards are wrong because in terms of establishing any legal right to the money, the recording is not relevant although it might sway a judge in your favour.   The real issues here are that you entrusted Hermes with your property for a fee and they breached the contract by their negligence and damaged it.   Frankly you didn't need to insure it because customers shouldn't need to insure against the supplier's negligence - but you did get insurance and that will place extra pressure o Hermes to settle for the full amount.   The other element which concerns me is that Hermes now take it upon themselves apparently to destroy other people's property when they themselves have damaged it through their own negligence. I don't think that they have the right to do this and it is very easy for them to try and avoid liability of losing something by then saying that it was damaged and so they destroyed ir - and without presenting any evidence of the damage or of the  destroying of the item.   Hermes are disreputable and people should avoid them.   Please read up on the Hermes threads and about small claims in the County Court and about mediation. We will be happy to help you all the way but I would point out to you that you have made 17 posts and taen up a considerable amount of useful time simply trying to get you to tell us the story and to post up some important documents. It was all so unnecessary.   I have read your claim form but it has now been hidden in order to protect you as you had left your personal details on it.   I suggest that you redact documents in the future.   Feel free to ask questions as you go along.   By the way, the 14 day period runs fro the date of deemed service of the claim which is about   2 days from the date of issue.   You issued on the 27th.  So count 14 from the 30th.  Monitor the Moneyclaim site closely and apply for judgment the moment it lets you. You never know, there is a remote chance that they may nor file an AOS - very remote.   There is also a remote chance that they may pay you out in order to get you to withdraw the claim.  The recording may have helped if they do.   Keep us updated
    • to prove I actually sold the car. I have resolved to go to court and the SAR shows all the notes on the account. The fraud department flagged this and despite all entreaties, they refused to release the money. The buyer has send across a screenshot of his bank statement and I have the sales receipt showing I sold the car. I have also asked DVLA for confirmation.    Do you know which legislation I can rely on please and which forms to use as I think I have all I need to show proof of legitimacy i.e.   1. Sales receipt (Issued by me to buyer) 2. Bank statement Screenshot (showing payment) and letter from buyer confirming they purchased the car. 3. Letters to CEO and their responses 4. SAR 5. Cover Note.    it has passed 80 days now and I believe if the NCA is involved it should show up in the SAR, in any event I don't mind engaging relevant authorities and showing the proof and transaction history.    thanks B-Bunch
    • One worried business owner in Newcastle says his fleet could be repossessed in the coming weeks. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Like
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Claiming old charges with contractual interest


Recommended Posts

Thanks Tnook,

 

Bear with us while we discuss this behind the scenes - we want you to win just as much as you do but we want to find the right balance between maximising your claim without risking too much in court fees, and in possible court costs awarded to the defendant bank.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hi all. Starting a new thread on the journey to reclaim my very old charges. The story so far. After chasing Barclays for almost 18 months and with days to go before a court hearing they handed over m

don't forget the shelley and martin2006 threads 

Restitution..until they settle

Posted Images

  • 2 months later...

Hi all,

 

Hope everyone survived Christmas and the New Year. I've been digging around the site and found this for a POC. Just investigating the POC at this stage. Are they still good to be used or has anything changed since they were last used?

 

I haven't kicked off the process of sending request letters yet. I am to break up the claims into smaller 'small claims track' chunks. Is there a way of avoiding them saying "full and final settlement of ALL charges" and get them to just be a "full and final settlement of the LISTED charges?

 

Thanks for all your help.

 

Here is the POC I found:

 

New POC Barclays (N1)

Claim No [ ]

 

IN THE [xxxxxcounty court

  

 BETWEEN

 

 [Mr xxxx xxxx]

 Claimant

 

 and

 

 

 -Barclays

  

 Defendant

 

 

 PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

 

 

 1. The Claimant entered into an agreement (“The Agreement”) with the Defendant on or around xx/xx/xxxx, whereby the Defendant was to advance credit facilities to the Claimant under a running credit account, Account no xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ("The Account").

 

 2. The Agreement essentially consisted of the Defendant providing the Claimant with a credit card (“The Card”) which would allow the Claimant to make purchases and receive cash advances on credit. In return the Defendant was entitled to charge interest at the published rate.

 

 3. The Agreement was a Regulated Agreement for the purposes of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

 4. At all material times the contract was subject to the Defendant’s standard terms and conditions which could be varied from time to time.

 

 

Summary

 

5. Throughout the course of the Agreement, the Defendant has added numerous default charges to the Account for the Claimant’s failure to make the minimum payment on the due date and or for exceeding the credit limit and or if a payment is returned. (Full particulars are set out in schedule 2).

 

6. The default charges were applied in accordance with the standard terms of The Agreement which were:

a) A penalty payable on breach of contract and thus unenforceable: and

b) An unfair term under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (“The Regulations”) and therefore not binding on the Claimant.

 

 

7. The Claimant is accordingly entitled to repayment of the sums wrongly added to the Account.

 

The Charges

  

8. The standard Terms of the Agreement in substance provided as follows:

(a) The Defendant would provide the Claimant with the Card. The Claimant was entitled to use the Card to make purchases and receive cash advances up to a credit limit (“the Limit”) set by the Defendant. The Defendant could unilaterally change the Limit by giving the Claimant notice in writing.

(b) The Defendant was entitled to charge interest on the purchases and cash advances at the published rate.

© The Claimant was to pay the minimum payment of 3% of the amount owed or £5 (whichever was the greatest) by the due date as notified in the monthly statements.

(d) The default charges Apr xxxx – Jun xxxx were £xx.xx, Aug xxxx – Nov xxxx was £xx.xx & Jun xxxx was £xx.xx.

 

Penalty

 

9.The amount of the Charges exceeded any genuine pre-estimate of the damage which would have been suffered by the Bank in relation to the Claimant’s transgressions.

 

10. In the premises the Charges were punitive and a penalty and thus unenforceable at common law.

 

The Regulations

 

 

11.At all material times the Claimant was a consumer within the Regulations.

 

13. At all material times the terms of the Agreement providing for the Charges were unfair within regulation 5 of the Regulations in that contrary to the requirement of good faith they caused a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations to the detriment of the Claimant.

 

14. Without prejudice to the burden of proof, the Claimant will refer to the following matters in support of the contention that the terms are to be assessed as unfair as at the time of the conclusion of the Agreement, and of each revision to the Standard Terms.

(1)The terms relating to Charges were standard terms; they would not be individually negotiated.

(2)The Charges were a penalty for breach of contract.

(3)The Charges exceeded the costs which the Bank could have expected to incur in dealing with the exceeding of the credit limit, late payment or returned payment.

(4) Accordingly the Charges were a disproportionate charge incurred by the Claimant for their failure to meet their contractual obligation and thus within the ambit of Schedule 2 (1) (e) of the Regulations and indicative of an unfair term.

(5) As the Bank knew, the Charges were of subsidiary importance to the customer in the context of the Agreement as a whole and would not influence the making of the Agreement.

(6) As the Defendant knew, the Claimant had no means of assessing the fairness of the Charges.

(7) In the premises, the effect of the Charges would be prejudicial to the customer who incurred them, and cause an imbalance in the relations of the parties to the Agreement by subordinating the customer’s interests to those of the Defendant in a way which was inequitable.

 

15. Without prejudice to the burden of proof, the Claimant will contend that the terms’ imposing the Charges are not core terms under regulation 6 of the Regulations and relies on the following matters.

(1) The assessment of fairness does not relate to terms which define the main or core subject matter of the Agreement.

(2) The assessment of fairness does not relate to the adequacy of the price or remuneration as against the goods or services supplied in exchange (in other words, whether or not the relevant services were value for money).

(3) The Charges are correctly described as default charges by the Defendant in the key information provided to new customers.

 

16. By reason of the said matters the terms were not binding under regulation 8 of the Regulations.

 

17. The Defendant wrongly applied Charges to the Account totalling some £xxx.xx between xx/xx/xxxx and xx/xx/xxxx. Particulars appear from Schedule 2.

 

18. On xx/xx/xxxx the Claimant demanded repayment of the sums wrongly applied.

 

19. The Defendant has not repaid them or any of them.

 

And the Claimant claims; 

 

(1) These charges are older than the normal 6 years but are claimed by virtue of s32 (1) c Limitations Act 1980 as per Kleinwort Benson v Lincoln City Council.

 

(2) Payment of the said sum of £xxx.xx and interest in restitution of £xxxx.xx as per Sempra Metals v Inland Revenue Commissioners.

 

(3) Interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 29.9% per annum on the amount claimed (daily rate of £x.xx) until judgment or sooner payment.

 

(4) Court costs of [ xxxx].

 

believe that the facts stated in these particulars, comprising of x pages, are true.

 

Dated

  

Signed

 

 

 

 

Schedule 1

 

From Cahoot Conditions in force (as of Dec xxxx).

 

3. Credit limit

From time to time we will work out your credit limit and tell you what it is.

 

5. Repayments

each month you must make a minimum payment. This will be;

(a)3% of the statement balance for Initial Visa, First Classic and Classic and 2% of the statement balance for Gold Barclaycard and Barclaycard Platinum or £5 whichever is more; or if the statement balance is less, the statement balance; or

(b)If a special promotion allows you to put off making repayments for a period, the amount worked out under (a) but with the relevant promotional balance taken away from the statement balance. 

The minimum payment must be received by us and paid into your account on or before the payment date.

 

 

 

 

Schedule 2

 

 

 

Attach your schedule of charges and head it schedule 2 be sure to include the date that charge was applied to the account, the date you paid the charge, the type of charge eg over limit, late payment etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TN,

 

It gets quiet over the w/end but I hope Site Team @Andyorch  will drop by soon to look over the POC. I suspect he may advise some changes to  update  the document.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Is there a way of avoiding them saying " full and final settlement of ALL charges" and get them to just be a " full and final settlement of the LISTED charges?

 

 

I think I understand why you are asking this......and the possible defence you may encounter.

Given that you intend to issue separate claims against the same agreement...they may argue that you are litigating more than once on the same issue.

 

 

A defendant to a claim may use res judicata as defense subject to how the particulars are worded. The general rule is that a claimant who instigates an action against a defendant and obtained a valid final judgment is not able to initiate another action versus the same defendant where:

  • the claim is based on the same transaction that was at issue in the first action;
  • the claimant seeks a different remedy, or further remedy, than was obtained in the first action;
  • the claim is of such nature as could have been joined in the first action

 

So you may hit a stalemate in getting round " All " and " Listed "...but of course you dont have to accept in full and final...unless its drafted as this claim only.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...

Hi all,

 

Haven't started the claim process yet. Been a bit sidetracked with pandemics recently.

 

Thanks for the insights @Andyorch abiout multiple claims. Could I break down a claim into two if I went after different types of charges per claim sequentially. So one account and went after:

 

Claim 1: Late Payment Fees

Claim 2: Over limit fees

 

Thanks for your help.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going over the statements I got from my SAR court action. Interesting to note Barclays use Iron Mountain for their storage. Not sure it's relevant but may help others in future. See attachment.

 

 

Screenshot 2020-06-22 at 14.26.05.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Ok, progressing with my first POC, I am adapting the previous version used by Shelly etc.. aiming to submit it today. I've already sent the request for payment and LBA letters as per usual.

 

Couple questions:

 

1. I had added references to the Consumer Rights Act 2015 as well as the UTCCR 1999 since the claim spans both. Have I done this correctly?

2. The charges and restitution come to just under £10k, when the court fee is added it takes the claim just over £10k, will this push it out of the small claims track? I can reduce the claim a bit to compensate if I need to.

3. I've started filling in the MCOL forms, it asks for the items claimed. Do I separate  the Charges and Restitution or combine them?

 

Thanks for you help.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, tnook said:

Ok, progressing with my first POC, I am adapting the previous version used by Shelly etc.. aiming to submit it today. I've already sent the request for payment and LBA letters as per usual.

 

Couple questions:

 

1. I had added references to the Consumer Rights Act 2015 as well as the UTCCR 1999 since the claim spans both. Have I done this correctly?

Yes

59 minutes ago, tnook said:

2. The charges and restitution come to just under £10k, when the court fee is added it takes the claim just over £10k, will this push it out of the small claims track? I can reduce the claim a bit to compensate if I need to. £10K + costs is SCT

 

3. I've started filling in the MCOL forms, it asks for the items claimed. Do I separate  the Charges and Restitution or combine them?

Are you issuing separate particulars ?

59 minutes ago, tnook said:

 

Thanks for you help.

 

 

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the pointers. I have amended Shelly's POC to include CRA and UTCCR. I've attached my draft as a PDF for anyone to comment on. 

 

I hadn't planned on issuing separate particulars since you can now attach longer documents to MCOL. If it looks ok. I'll submit it. Looking forward to getting this on the way. :)

 

 

CAG CC POC 2020.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks good.....the only I would possibly suggest is throwing in that the £12 limit was never set by the courts as an acceptable amount.....its was decided in the OFT case in Manchester that £12 was an acceptable charge re current accounts and overdrafts....not credit cards...they simply latched on and reduced all their fees to this level. 

 

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/regulators-no-to-action-over-bank-937645.amp

 

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/overdrafts-victory-for-customers-951469

 

https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/personal-current-account-contract-terms-unarranged-overdraft-charges

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Missile launched :)

 

 

Quote

What happens next

Barclays Bank UK PLC has until 4pm on 17 August 2020 to respond to your claim. They can request an extra 14 days if they need it.

You can request a County Court Judgment against them if they don’t respond by the deadline.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doing exactly the same with Cahoot/Santander credit card. They have another week before their LBA expires.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Progress. I have received an email letter from Barclays solicitors. Same company who handled my claim to get the statements. They seem to think I am rushing things by going to court and should wait for a response from the bank. Bit odd, since they wrote to me with their final position in July stating that they would not refund the charges.

 

Dear Sir

 

Our client: Barclays Bank UK PLC t/a Barclaycard
 

We are instructed on behalf of Barclays Bank UK PLC t/a Barclaycard (the Bank) and refer to

your letters dated 16 July 2020 and 22 June 2020.

 

We are currently taking instructions from the Bank in relation to your correspondence and will endeavour to provide you with the Bank’s response on or before 28 August 2020 (i.e. within 21 days).

In the meantime and until you receive the Bank’s response, we believe that it would be entirely premature for you to take the legal action that you speak of and so we would ask you to refrain from doing so.

 

Should you choose to commence legal proceedings immediately, we reserve the right to refer this letter to the Court on any question of costs that may arise.

 

Moving forwards, we should be grateful if you could refer any future correspondence in relation to this matter to our Mohammed Algrieri via the above email address.

 

Yours faithfully

The solicitors

 

My reply to them:

 

Quote
Dear Sir,
 
Thank-you for your correspondence. I draw your attention to the letter Barclays sent on the 6th of July stating their final position was not to support my complaint. If Barclays have changed their mind and wish to settle I would be happy withdraw the claim and we could save the courts time and costs.
 
Yours faithfully,
tnook

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Update: Unsurprisingly the bank have requested the extra 14 days to file their defence.

 

Quote

The defendant has requested more time to respond

Barclays Bank UK PLC has requested an extra 14 days to respond. They now have until 4pm on 7 September 2020 to respond.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

New development today. BC solicitor is asking me for another 7 days to submit their defence on top of the additional 2 weeks they have taken.

 

Meanwhile on my Santander thread, their defence makes it look like they are ready to go to court to fight it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They only get 14 days...that the law......unless its agreed by you.

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part15#15.5

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No......they have already had 33 days in total....no need for 40.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So today at 4pm is the deadline for BC to file a defence . They have asked for an additional 7 days. As you say AndyOrch, they have had enough time. They have actually had 41 days so far. BC got the claim on August 18th, they asked for 2 more weeks the deadline then for submission was Sept 7th. BC then got an additional 21 days. The attached PDF is the original response BC sent to the court. Every part of the form is filled in with the same phrase:

 

Quote

Please see the email sent to the Court

[contactocmc@justice.gov.uk ] on 4 September 2020 at 15:12PM. The email attached the Defendant's N244 Application Notice and Draft Order. We confirm that a copy of these documents have been served on the Claimant.

 

 

This is the core of the email they sent to the court on the 4th of Sept, basically asking for a 21 day extension.

 

Quote

1.    The Claimant is an individual and the Defendant (the Bank) is a financial institution. This claim concerns
account fees applied to the Claimant's credit card accounts.

2.    The claim was issued in the County Court Business Centre via Online Civil Money Claims on 5 August 2020.

3.    The Bank's legal representatives (xxxx) received the Claim Form from the Bank on 13 August 2020 and acknowledged the claim on 18 August 2020. The deadline for filing the response is currently 7 September 2020.

4.    The claim raises various points of law and so the Bank is engaging counsel in respect of the allegations raised by the Claimant. Whilst the Bank will finalise and file its defence to the claim as soon as possible, the Bank is not yet in a position to finalise, file and serve its defence. Therefore, by granting the Bank an extension to the deadline, it is likely to save time and costs of having to amend or alter the defence at a later stage in these proceedings.

5.    By an email dated 4 September 2020, BC requested the Claimant's consent to a 21 day extension of time to file and serve its response, to 28 September 2020. At the time of this application, the Claimant has not yet provided a response to this request.

6.    The Bank therefore respectfully requests that an order be made, under the Court's case management powers in CPR 3.1(2)(a), extending the deadline for the Bank to file and serve its defence to 4.00pm on 28 September 2020. The Bank considers an extension to be reasonable in the circumstances - an extension would not prejudice the Claimant's position and would simply allow the Defendant adequate time to consider and respond to the Claimant's allegations.

 

However, they did tick the box agreeing to mediation. So now the mediation cycle is kicking off, which will commence within the next 2 weeks. I guess they managed to get their extension through the back door.

redact-response.pdf

Edited by tnook
Link to post
Share on other sites

What mediation tick box ?  They have yet to submit a defence and mediation only applies at allocation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not up to date on this new system.....so they complete a directions questionnaire now before submitting a defence ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...