Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parker Prestige car sales Richmond


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1607 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Parker Prestige Car sale in Richmond Yorkshire.

 

I bought a BMW M5 from Parker prestige on 11th February 2019. 

I notified them of the major faults with the car on 25th February. 

The car also had cheap chinese fake alloy wheels instead of genuine BMW alloys.

I waited until 22nd June for them to repair the faults and replace the fake alloy wheels and they wouldnt..

I then proceeded to reject the Car from Parker Prestige for unfit for purpose, not as described.

I am still waiting for my money back. 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

bmwfakealloys.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Parker Prestige car sales Richmond

Has there been any written exchange?

Although you have contractual rights anyway, under the Consumer Rights Act you have additional rights to reject the vehicle or to insist on a repair and saying that refund. However this has to be done within the first six months and in writing. Have you done this?

Please will you tell us what the faults are.

Are you still using the vehicle?

Have you obtained any quotations from anybody else to carry out the work and also to replace the wheel rims?

Presumably you inspected the car before you bought it. Is it obvious that the rims are fake Chinese? If it's not obvious then how did you discover it? If it is obvious then why didn't you notice it at the time of the purchase?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello. 

I have rejected the car in writing.

I beleive i am still in my short term right to reject 30 days, as the faults were reported with 10 days and have not been repaired. The major fault was the pedestrian collision warning light saying not to drive car. 

No the car cannot be driven as the fault hasnt been repaired .

 

I have uploaded a picture of the wheels. 

 

They are presented as genuine BMW alloys with BMW logo on them. Therefore any reasonable person would assume them to be genuine. Please bear in mind i paid £26K for this car.

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

The right to reject the vehicle has to be asserted in writing and as far as I understand the statute, you have to refer to that particular right.

These would you post up in PDF format, a copy of the rejection letter that you send them. You haven't told us the date you sent it. Although you have told us that you reported the faults, it's not clear that you asserted your short-term right to reject.

I understand from you that you have not been driving the vehicle since 25 February. Is this correct? Will the mileage confirm that?

You haven't told us anything about any responses from them. Please will you tell us about the exchange between you.

Have you had any independent quotations or assessments of the repair work needed – including the cost of replacing the rims?

Also please can you tell us a bit more about the car – the year, mileage, and price paid

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also going to say that I don't particularly understand why you have waited for so long – we are now almost in December so we are approaching a year since you purchased the car and pretty soon after that that you discover the faults

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please will you address all the questions I'm putting to. Otherwise we won't be able to give you the help that you need

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Car is a 2013 BMW M5. Costing £26k.

 

The BMW dealership in Bristol has confirmed that the alloys are fake and provided a quote for £4000 to replace. 

The car is subject also to a finance agreement with Santander consumer finance aswell. (I have already copied them into the rejection)

The car was declared sorn in june and the log book has been sent back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the finance agreement an HP agreement or a loan?

You haven't told us anything more about the exchange with Parker Prestige. You also haven't told us about the cost of repairing the light problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, as it was SORN in June, does that mean that it was driven until that time? Once again, how much mileage did you put on to the vehicle before you stopped driving it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Matt, it's a bit difficult because I keep on asking you questions and you don't address them and I have to ask them again.

I've asked you about the finance deal.
I've asked you about the diagnosis of the warning light.
I've asked you about the mileage that you put on.
I've asked you about the exchange that you had with the dealer.
I've asked you to post up your letter of rejection in PDF format.

We give extremely good quality help here and we do it for free. If you were paying a solicitor £300 an hour, you would probably answer the questions pretty quickly in order to save yourself money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...