Jump to content


UKCPS MNPR PCN PAPLOC - no stopping Gateway House Piccadilly Manchester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1165 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In simple terms you are being lied to so a parking co can earn a  few quid from your ignorance.

 

Start to fight back by reading up on them and also the law surrounding car parking contracts. somehting that says no stopping isnt an offer of anything so not a contract that can be offered, considered and accepted. Any charge would be an unlawful penalty.

 

Now council car parks have similar terms but they are allowed to make penalty charges by statute law and the level of these is also prescribed.

 

that is a big difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So we received a Debt Recovery Lteer, I presume this is a made up company..

 

they are claiming to be acting upon the carp park to recover the monies that are owed.   Again ignoring this is making my wife a little nervous!

 

Should I upload the file or are we all familiar with the letter?

 

Thanks again

 

Graham

Link to post
Share on other sites

not a letter of claim

and a dca cant issue one of those anyway as you know and have already read on this forum several times I hope about what a dca is ….or not..

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a Quick one for the mods/expert on here.

 

I have two cases for the same spot on this car park.  I dropped two people off at different days and I am wondering if this will hinder any chances of this case being dropped?

 

We have one letter at the Debt recovery plus tage and i dont think we are far away from a letter for the second one.

 

Again advise would be brilliant

 

also, has anyone seen anyone else sucessfully win their case at this car park?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

posts moved to your existing thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no such things as no stopping ....a private parking co can't enforce traffic regulations on private land

you stopped for less than 10minutes - there is a written in stone rule regarding this 10 mins now 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also read a few threads on CAG and also MSE and there is one conflic of opnions which does worry me a little which is the ignore or appeal...

 

Ignore until they get to a stage where I have to respond or appeal and not let any claim forms come throug the post and cause unnecesarry stress as my wife is the RK of the car.

 

I trust your judgement on here as your advice has always been clear and confident but i thoguht I would still ask at what point is ignoring these both, going to do us harm with a CCJ or something?

 

Thanks again

 

Gee

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got one too.

 

I was working in the station but the entrance barrier to the contractors car park was broken so i reversed into that area while I made a call to see what the problem was.

 

This means i might have been in the area more than 10 mins, not sure. 

 

The NTK has just come through and i am wondering if UKCPS is trying to learn from previous errors.

 

This NTK does state " made under the protection of freedoms act 2012" but does not mention section 4. It has one image of my number plate close up, no others. 

 

 I gather the general advice so far seems to be to ignore it but i thought i had better ask in case there is some new small detail they have added which they could catch me out on.

 

Any advice would be appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please create your own topic

Hit create in the top red banner dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

UPDATE:

 

so we received a letter after the last action before legal and its a reduced offer before it goes to court maybe.

 

 

Is this normal? it tells me that they are showing signs of better soemthing rather than nothing approach!

 

we also have had two claims against this as i turned around in the same spot twice in 2 weeks! will this go against me?

 

Gee

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

what do you mean by 'claims'?

 

what letter scan to pdf

 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dx100uk said:

we also have had two claims against this as i turned around in the same spot twice in 2 weeks! will this go against me?

 

 

so only silly DCA letters that you already know to ignore

 

but what do you NOT ignore?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

that site is crap and has so much fake news on it its amazing

and they tout for fees for their useless advice..

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But I charge for my advice using the same laws as the parking co's use to make their invoices valid so you all owe me £100 each for reading my scribbles and you dont have 10 minutes thinking time either.

That will rise to £160 if I have to  tell you another fib and another £50 if I have to threaten to get my brother Eric to read your responses to my threats

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...