Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
    • Despite controversy China's Temu is becoming a global online shopping force.View the full article
    • The retailer has come under fire for an advert showing motorcyclists wearing trainers and doing wheelies.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rooftops Mortgage co. demanding I*E for Arrears repayment Arrangement


Pudwud100
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1577 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I hope someone can point me in the right direction. 

 

I am having difficulty with both my mortgage company and Vanquis who are demanding I complete an Income & Expenditure form which is very intrusive as well as sending in 3 months worth of bank statements. 

 

I have recently had my mortgage transferred to Rooftop and I know there is MUCH on the Forum about those people. 

I am beginning to lose sleep about this situation and so is my wife. 

 

I have £800 of arrears on the mortgage and am able to overpay the monthly amount by £200 to clear this. 

I have already proved this is possible by doing this last month

 

Rooftop will have none of it and have now given me just 7 days to send in their IE form, payslips (which I've already told them I don't have as my wife is the income earner) and bank statements (which of course would tell them all about our lifestyle and do nothing to reveal that that is dictated by our special needs son.

 

Vanquis have said much the same thing and are demanding the same.

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to do their income and expenditure forms, it's none of their business what you do with your finances as long as you keep up payments and pay down the arrears.

 

How many months does the £800 represent ?  have you written to them offering the extra 200 per month ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes lets deal with this properly

 

I bet there are £1000's of unlawful penalty charges levied by the original mortgage company

like letters.phonecalls.debt management visits.arrears fees.

all can be reclaimed.

 

shall we have a guess who the mortgage was with...

 

rooftop have several times now been reprimanded by the relevant authorities upon their treatment and unlawful fees against mortgage debtors

one case being a debt of a couple £100's ending up at +£8k due to all their unlawful fees

 

they were blocked many years ago from further and future lending and only now make any money by buying mortgages of people in arrears from other subprime lenders and racking up £1000's in unlawful charges against mugs that know no different and blindly cough up or lose their homes without fighting back properly and lawfully.

 

start a new thread for the vanquis debt please

 

 

thread tidied

discussion thread created here

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Rooftops Mortgage co. demanding I*E for Arrears repayment Arrangement

To re iterate.

The op is having trouble with vanquish and the mortgage

 

My advice is to get the vanquish on a debt plan,  she can add all her other none priototy debts if she wishes

 

What will happen the is all calls letters from vanquis Will stop, takes about ten minutes.

 

She  is then left to her important problem. The mortgage, I have some  expertise on second and charges mortgages, first could you answer 

 Ell -ens question above   please  it's important.

Do we know of what they are accused. 

 

 

Edited by Dodgeball
Mobile fat fingers

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't blindly go engaging the services of any debt management plan providers at this stage.

 

it is better to simply ignore the demands from such companies as vanquis etc for the time being.

there is nothing they can do to you. as already advised please start a new thread on this vanquis debt when you are ready to.

 

focus on the mortgage issue you came here with thus keeping the roof over your head as the top priority.

 

involving any third party interlopers in your global debt situation will only cause greater issues for you in the future.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks particularly to dx100uk. 

 

The £800 of arrears was racked up with MPLC over the course of 4 months because my wife who works in the childcare sector, and who is the principal earner in our family, was having a tough time workwise and ended up going through 3 jobs and then having to take agency work. 

 

MPLC weren't that bothered and we reached a verbal deal with them at the end of October. 

However, we had just successfully reclaimed a whole lot of "arrears monitoring charges" back off them although they wouldn't go back more than 3 years saying they didn't have to. 

 

Literally 2 days after this, and before the payment arrangement could be confimed in writing, we get a letter stating the mortgage had been sold to Rooftop.  Coincidence or what?

 

So of course Rooftop know nothing about the arrangement reached with MPLC. 

I challenged them to contact MPLC. 

 

Their response was to slap a £50 arrears fee for the month prior to when they became responsible for the mortgage plus "additional interest".  I said they can't do this and they say "Oh yes we can!" 

 

We then play ping-pong where they phone me at times when I'm out and then accuse me of failing to make contact. 

I phone back and the arrears team are never available. 

 

So eventually I do get through and there is a somewhat aggressive conversation where I'm told in no uncertain terms to do the IE form and send in bank statements and payslips.  I point out that I am retired. I'm actually a full-time carer to our special needs son who is registered disabled. Rooftop have now followed up with a letter telling me I have 7 days to do the form.

 

Now I don't think Rooftop like people who possess the ability to think. 

I don't want these arrears hanging around a second longer than necessary and now that my wife is back in stable employment we worked out a plan whereby we overpay the mortgage by £200 each month. 

 

We made the first of these payments on 8 November. 

The overpayment was accepted and applied to the arrears so is this tantamount to acceptance?

 

However the lady in the arrears team views this only as a 'proposal' and nothing can be agreed until I do what they want. 

I have no intention of doing this and sticking their noses into every aspect of our life is not going to happen!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon: rock on you.

that's the way to deal with them.

 

quite correct that there is no time limit on those unlawful fees, and as they have refunded some, it's admittance by them so should make the rest easy to prise out of them with a letter telling them you are going to escalate things further to p'haps the FOS etc.

 

whilst writing to them or just do this alone if you don't want to escalate the charges for the minute.....tell them you will not now ever allow commincation by phone again and demand everything must always be in writing only from now on and to remove all your phone numbers and email details from your file..

 

go kick 'em!!

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It wouldn't be the first time

Yes you need to send an I and E to them. You also need to learn more abut this transfer.

 

Was it on similar terms for instance, did you receive an NOA, 

 

you also need to say how many months you are in arrears, because if it is over three they can apply for possession

 

I am guessing they are making these threats so unpalatable is because they do not really want you to cooperate, that way they can justify their actions to the judge.

 

You are correct about sub prime lenders not liking people who think.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no legal compulsion to ever send an I&E.

none of their business..

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX   It is no about legal direction.

 

It is about the opinion of the judge when they apply for an order.

 

ie. "We tried everything to help your honour but they wouldn't even send us an I and E."

 

It wouldn't be the first time

Yes you need to send an I and E to them. You also need to learn more abut this transfer.

 

Was it on similar terms for instance, did you receive an NOA, 

 

you also need to say how many months you are in arrears, because if it is over three they can apply for possession

 

I am guessing they are making these threats so unpalatable is because they do not really want you to cooperate, that way they can justify their actions to the judge.

 

You are correct about sub prime lenders not liking people who think.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pudwud100 said:

Thank you again dx100uk but is Dodgeball correct about the 3 months rule?

 

 

LOPA, 1925

 

Judge will usually grant an extension, if the debtor is complying with any help from the creditor and can show a reasonable chance of repaying. Depends entirely on the circumstances.

 

Ell-enn is the expert

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the FCA Handbook

 

The FCA regulations says that the lender must consider whether it is appropriate to do one or more of the following:[3]

  • extend the term of the mortgage
  • change the type of mortgage
  • defer payment of interest due
  • capitalise the arrears
  • make use of any government forbearance schemes that it has signed up to.

The lender must give the borrower adequate information to understand the implications of any proposed arrangement for paying off the arrears on the mortgage.

Edited by Dodgeball

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyway you have made it clear my presence is not required, so I will say good luck.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...