Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No you don't have to pay them.  it is their scam which the Courts know about. There was a classic case a few years ago that decided that £100 was not a penalty because that company had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear of cars that overstayed etc because they were there to maximise the availability of car park spaces. As Starbucks was closed in your case, Met have no legitimate interest so their £100 charge IS a penalty. Therefore the case would be thrown out. if they took you to Court and you turned up in Court to defend yourself. So no you shouldn't pay.
    • Thank you as always. Okay, will contact Tesco and will ignore the appeal, and will let you know what happens. You guys are superheroes.
    • A former Tesla engineer is in a decade-long battle with the car company, owned by Elon Musk.View the full article
    • what isn't working out....one very small issue, the rest is going perfectly fine. stop doing your usually running around waving arms and screaming on my god oh my god...sorry too used to you LMM even if you cant hold down a new bank account all is not lost .  ive not seen any reports that monzo refuse people  so go with them. pers as i said id NOT be using any switch service, as there are debts you want to stop paying and get them defaulted BEFORE you ever think of poss might could should pay them. its only a handful of stuff like rent/ctax/ etc that you need DD for ive not used DD's in almost 30yrs now nor use Standing orders, i do it by BACS each month priority bills first (can take roof from over my head if not paid) there REST all get paid if/when i've had the money. 2 well 3 things id dump too or get cheaper. cable/sat tv - ££6PCM . which i will is internet/tv/landline ? from whom that is very expensive. mine is £27PCM for 100MPS Broadband etc all in. 3 tv licence... who cant tell you are watching live tv even if you dont.... mobile phone £27? - go over to giffgaff no contract and as cheap as £6PCM even with mobile data (but use your home wf-fi when indoors!!) no need to keep using @Username, everyone that posted gets an alert like you do if someone posts. dx  
    • Critall windows date back to the 1880s but their steel construction makes them vulnerable to damp.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

FOS Stage on Irresponsible lending complaint - PDL Western Circle Ltd trading as Cashfloat - Default Notice being Threatened


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1403 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

A friend of mine took out a loan with Cashfloat/Western Circle for £300 in September and was due to make the first payment in October. 

She didn't make this payment and when I told her about this wonderful site she hit them with an IRL claim

- they have already added some £155 in interest and charges  to date.

 

She is constantly receiving text messages about making a payment when there is an outstanding complaint against them. 

She has offered £10 a month and all charges and interest to be frozen but as the letter was sent at the end of October they have 8 weeks to respond.

 

Today she has received a text message threatening her with a Default Notice and adding this to her credit file unless they come to a new agreement. 

It states that a Notice of Default will be sent to her home address and also her email address.

 

She doesn't use the internet much so I said I would ask on here to see if there is anything she can do to stop this. 

Her next payment isn't due until the 29th November.

 

Any help or guidance would be appreciated as she's getting really worried about this with them threatening her with a Default Notice.

 

Thanks Jo 

Link to post
Share on other sites

block the text /report as spam

 

block and bounce their email AD's

 

if her IRL complaint is successful the default must be removed

 

only converse ever in writing.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, they have just emailed this to her.

 

IMPORTANT - YOU SHOULD READ THIS CAREFULLY
 
DEFAULT NOTICE under Section 87 (I) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974
 
This is a Default Notice served under Section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.
 
In breach of clause [3] of the Agreement, reference XXXX, you have failed to pay the monthly instalments which fell due on 31-10-2019 on time and in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.
 
To avoid further action, please pay the arrears to us, which total XXXX by 04-12-2019.
 
If the action required by this notice is taken before the date shown no further enforcement action will be taken in respect of the breach.
 
If you do not take the action required by this notice before the date shown then the further action set out below may be taken against you.
 
If you fail to pay XXXX on or before 04-12-2019, we will enforce our rights and:
  • Send you a letter terminating your Agreement;
  • Demand you pay the balance due under the Agreement to us;
  • Report your default and non-payment to credit reference agencies; and
  • Issue legal proceedings and request Judgment for the balance due under the Agreement.
If the arrears are not discharged and the Agreement is terminated, you must make payment of the balance referred to above as a lump sum. If that lump sum payment is not made on 04-12-2019 balance will be recalculated as at the date when such payment is actually made or to be made.

In your own interests, you are strongly urged to contact us by telephone on 0203 757 1933.
 
If you have difficulty in paying any sum owing under the Agreement or taking any other action required by this Notice, you can apply to the Court which may make an order allowing you more time.

You should be aware that if we take you to Court and get a Judgment against you requiring you to pay us the money you owe us under the agreement, you may have to pay us both the amount of the Judgment and interest under the agreement on all the sums owed by you at the date of the Judgment until you have paid these in full. 
 
If you are not sure what to do, you should get help as soon as possible. For example you should contact a solicitor or your local Citizens' Advice Bureau.
 
This notice should include a copy of the current FCA's information sheet on default. This contains important information about your rights and where to go for support and advice.

If it is not included, you should contact us to get one.
If you would like to speak to us to discuss your arrears or the content of this notice, please contact us on 0203 757 1933
 
We look forward to hearing from you.

Yours Sincerely,
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi - just to update you on this.

 

My friend has now managed to stop the Default by agreeing to a repayment plan of £10 per month whilst she went through the IRL claim.  They have this week rejected the claim.

 

The original loan was for £300 taken out in September, they have added £210 in interest and charges since she couldn't make the payment due at the end of October!

 

Can she at least get the interest charges refunded so that it reverts back to the £300 - or is this not possible?

 

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

off to the fos

PDL's always refuse IRL.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Firstly, I hope everyone is staying safe during this trying time :-)

 

Back in December 2019 I opened a topic with regards to a friend of mine having issues with Cashfloat - I think the topic has been dormant for so long it has been closed off, however, if you are able to add this new topic to the existing one that would be great.

 

to update you,

she agreed a payment plan of £10 and went to the FOS on the basis of an IRL claim. 

 

Due to the Pandemic the FOS are some months behind, however, she received a response a couple of weeks ago to say that the FOS had written to Western Circle suggesting that they remove all interest and charges, and add the 8% interest etc. 

Western Circle have refused their request and have asked for the Ombudsman to make a final decision.

 

Personally, I have never experienced anything like this so I do not have much to tell her re the next steps. 

 

Has anyone else had this experience and is there much chance of her being successful and having the interest/charges removed which amount to around £200?

 

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the update. The chances tend to be in your favour that the ombudsman will confirm the decision of the adjudicator – but obviously can't be sure. You have to wait it out.

If you get a decision in your favour and if Western Circle refused to implement it then you can enforce it directly in the County Court. We will help you

Link to post
Share on other sites

did the FOS write to her with this decision themselves?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I thgink I read your reply wrong.

 

so the FOS has told them to remove all int and charges, what's the bit about 8% about?

p'haps it might be better to post up exactly what the FOS sent to her rather than Chinese whispers?

 

the Ombs himself rarely disagrees with their adjudicators...so is she happy with the decision?

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to FOS Stage on Irresponsible lending complaint - PDL Western Circle Ltd trading as Cashfloat - Default Notice being Threatened

the FOS have clearly stated that Western Circle Ltd trading as Cashfloat should not have loaned her the money in the 1st place.

 

the fos has stated that ALL interest and charges should be removed.

 

the FOS has stated that the initial sum loaned - £300 - is what is owed.

 

the FOS have stated that any payments made to date be used to reduce that £300 sum.

 

if Western Circle Ltd trading as Cashfloat disagree with that..tough luck on them.

 

she should continue whatever payment arrangement is inplace until see has paid Western Circle Ltd trading as Cashfloat the £300.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...