Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Did YB breach their owm T&Cs of my mortgage


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1608 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had  a 5yr fixed rate mortgage with Norwich & Peterborough before they merged YB.

I was to pay £585.27 Per month for 60 months fixed @ 5.85%.

 

first year ok,  

for the following three years as their SVR increased so did my mortgage; £589 1st increase 2nd increase £595, 3rd increase £599.

Along with the increases I was also charged late fees etc. from 2008 onwards.

 

I did receive a letter due to the enquiry into their fees but that only refunded from 2009,

where I had been incorrectly charged after one month in 2008,

plus the charges wern’t consistent with the £25 they allege to charge sometimes i was charges £32.50.


I know the increases are not considerable however with them increasing the mortgage due to their SVR increases did they 
1.    breach the terms & conditions of the mortgage contract.
2.    switched my mortgage to a SVR.

 

Any ideas appreciated.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think my mortgage was altered incorrectly as it was a 5 yr fixed rate,?

 

My reasons for asking is simply I no longer have the property, it was in fact repossessed in march 2012 by YB.

At the time I gave up fighting them as my mental health wasnt the best due to post natal drepression hence I had to resign from my employment. But its always been bugging at me to get advice.

 

the added charges plus interest with the inflated amounts, plus adding their insurance  plus interest gave an overall inflated (regardless of amount) end arrears figure to the court. The final balance given to the court was grossly overstated by them anyway as they gave the full redemption amount in their figures and it was in fact ending sept 2012 so only had 6 mths left ,

 

this all looked as though the property had negative equity, (it never as i already had 9,000 discount applied wen I purchased property) and I was scolded by the judge for my lack of responsibility, however having not been allowed to speak and address the hearing in the first instance, I just sat lowered my head and cried, my self esteem was already at a low but for a complete stranger to attack me that did tip me completely over edge.

 

They sold property 4mths later for £34,000 less than property originally valued in 2007 and I had added to the value since purchasing with loft etc.

 

They sent me the final charges, wow how they lie, £8,000 added for various things they allege, over  £2000.00 ground rent & service charges - on what!

You dont get to see any valuations etc, all charges added did not match what their current charges at that time stated.

 

Their starting figures on the mortgage didnt reflect what they claimed in court and the mortgage redemption amount only £1600 3 months after they had passed off the full figure to court.

 

i wrote to the solicitor to dispute, question and query the £41,000 shortfall, they never replied,

I received letters from YB chasibg debt, I ignored them.

 

Then after they had sent me the letter regarding refunding charges in 2017 (it reduced their debt) 

I received one letter stating the new shortfall amount then nothing for 2 yrs.

 

It makes me more determined to find out more.  

They have 12 yrs I believe to reclaim the debt from me, but what if??

 

They are quiet as they stumbled across their mistakes and realised their breaches in the mortgage, while checking my account to refund the incorrect and erratic different amounts month by month (25.00 sometimes 32.50 which isnt even stated as an amount) charges and are hoping I havnt a clue so I dont start questioning things?

 

Could it be possible I was wronged by them and if so, wouldn't I be entitled to some form of compensation or at most good will.

 

Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...