Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No DWP is in denial, the Errol Graham case has caused much concern   https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/errol-graham-coroner-pledges-to-press-dwp-on-safeguarding-review/   Something is amiss with the procedures, Capita and the PIP Assessments seem to go against what a claimant's doctors say quite often, as do the UC Work Capability Assessments
    • oh don't you just love fleecers out to make a buck out of people they think are just mugs..
    • Useful link, BN.   The article mentions that the National Audit Office said that the DWP isn't learning anything from its mistakes.   HB
    • 1.     The Claimant claims £9,240.52 for monies due from the Defendant.   2.     This debt was pursuant to a regulated agreement(s) between the Defendant and The Student Loans Company Limited.  Each agreement had an individual account number as follows: 01xxxxxxxx, 00xxxxxxx, 97xxxxxxx, 96xxxxxxx.   3.     The Defendant failed to make payments as per the terms resulting in the agreement(s) being terminated.   Notice of such is served by a Default or Termination Notice subject to the terms of the agreement(s).   4.     The debt was assigned to the Claimant on 22/11/2013, with a notice provided to the Defendant.   A new master reference number xxxxxxxxxxxxx was also applied upon assignment.   5.     The Claimant has complied with the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims   DEFENCE ……………...   The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5(3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.   1.     Paragraph 1 2 is noted and denied accepted . I have had financial dealings with The Student Loans company in the past.  I do not recall the precise details or agreement and have sought verification from the claimant who has not complied with my requests for further information.   2.     Paragraph 2 is noted and accepted.  I did take out 4 student loans with the Student Loans Company.   2.     Paragraph 3 is noted and denied.  The Defendant never agreed to make payments to the Claimant, terms of the original Student Loans Agreement have been adhered to and thus repayments of loans are not due.  The Claimant is put to strict proof that an agreement(s) to make payments was made and a breach of agreement(s) occurred.   Paragraph 3 is denied as The Defendant maintains that a default notices were never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof that default notices were issued to, and received by the Defendant    3. Paragraphs1 & 4 are denied.The annual income of the Defendant has never exceeded the published limits for deferral since graduating in XXXX. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly provided by the Claimant pursuant to the LoP Act 1925.   4.      On receipt of this claim I requested (Royal Mail signed for) on 14/02/2020 a CPR 31.14 from the Claimant's solicitor and a section 77 CCA from the Claimant, to which both have failed to respond to,  It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant;  the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of credit agreement/assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31.14, and remains in default of my section 77 CCA Request, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a)   Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement(s) (b)  Show how the Defendant is in breach of agreement(s) (c)   Show why the Claimant has terminated agreement(s) show the nature of breach and service of Default Notices and subsequent Notice of Sums in Arrears in accordance with the Consumer  Credit Act (d)  Show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for and (e)   Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.     5. On receipt of this claim I requested (Royal Mail signed for) on 14/02/2020 a CPR 31.14 from the Claimant's solicitor and a section 77 CCA from the Claimant,  for copies of the documents referred to within the Claimant’s particulars to establish what the claim is for. To date the Claimant has failed to comply to my section 77 requests and their solicitors, Drydens Limited, have refused my CPR 31.14 request.    6.     The Defendant has supplied the Claimant with a deferment letter and evidence every year that their income is below the threshold for repayments, by way of Royal Mail signed for and proof of postage has been kept. As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.      7.     The Defendant has done everything required of them to qualify for deferment as per the original agreement(s) with The Student Loans company.  The Claimant has only once acknowledged a deferment letter on 16 September 2014 whereupon they granted their request to defer repayments for that year. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82 A of the consumer credit Act 1974.    8.The Defendant therefore fails to see how they are in breach of any agreement(s) and deny the Claimant's claim of £9,240.52 or any other sum, or relief of any kind. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief        ……………………………...   delete the red add the blue.    
    • Is this better?   In the Bristol Civic Justice Centre   Claimant name and address xxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxx   Defendants name and address Nissan Motor (GB) Limited, The Rivers Office Park, Denham Way, Maple Cross, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, WD3 9YS.   Brief details of claim Damages   Value £225   Particulars of claim 1. The Defendant is a Data Controller within the meaning of the Data Protection Act 2018 and is responsible for the processing of data of which the Claimant is a Subject.     2. This claim is in relation to three breaches of the Data Protection Act (2018) by the Defendant. (a) Failure to comply with the statutory time limit. (b) The Defendants data disclosure was incomplete. (c) The Defendant sent the data to an address which was not the address of the      Claimant data Subject.    3. The Defendant has failed to comply with the statutory time limit and is therefore in breach of the Data Protection Act (2018). (a) On 09 January 2020, the Claimant made a request for to the Defendant for a statutory data disclosure.  The statutory timeframe for compliance was 10 February 2020.    4. The Defendants data disclosure is incomplete.  (a) The Defendant has provided data disclosure on 25 February 2020.  However, the data disclosure that has been provided by the Defendant is incomplete.    5. The Defendant sent the disclosure to an address that was not the Claimant’s. (a) The Claimant provided the Defendant with the correct address to send the Subject Access Request to on 10 January 2020 and again on 19 February 2020.      6. The Claimant has made a complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) asking for a statutory assessment to be carried out.  The ICO has offered a preliminary view that the Defendant has breached their statutory duty in failing to comply with the statutory time limit.    7. By virtue of the Defendant’s failure to comply with the Subject Access Request the Claimant has suffered distress.
  • Our picks

Johnshell

NPS 3 PCNs now 3 Letters of claim - Lower Feversham St Car Park Midds TS2 1PB

Recommended Posts

there is a mssive difference between the posts, the first  letter on your lot here John is forma  company that was wound up by companieshouse in JAN 2016 so hd no authority to send you anything after this date

 

The newco wasnt formed then either . they were also IPC members whereas the newco are BPA

 

So my suggestion is you respond to the address indicated on the new demands (London address) and say simply

Dear sirs,

your claim relates to a dissolved company that wasnt trading at the time of the supposed cause for action and you have no agency in this matter so Oh flip off and when you get there Oh flip off some more.

I'm sure that criminality wont be suffered kindly by the courts if you are stupid enough to continue with this fraud

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ericsbrother, what send a letter in them exact words? I assume it's best to do it in writing? Would I need to reference any of the claims? 

 

I've been reading some of your responses and they do make me laugh lol!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One in reply to each letter of claim as written above in eb's post

By royal mail only!!

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sending these responses off today, I just want to check one thing before I do so, should I send each letter of claim back with the reply or just reference it in my reply with their reference number?

 

I just want to thank you all for your help so far! I really appreciate it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just use their ref on each.

no need for anything else

though in normal circumstances say with a consumer credit claim, your would return more.


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, little update, I done everything as instructed and haven't heard a peep, untill now.

 

I have received 3 more letters of claim, almost identical to ones previously.

 

I'll upload these now.

 

Anyone help on what my next action should be?

 

https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3Acce92c66-f02c-44d0-a86e-5cfe24ec4ea7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't use hosting sites.

upload as pdf here

read upload carefully.

 

are these for the same tickets already PAPLOC replied too?

 

dx

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 I am struggling to upload as pdf, I cant work out how to do it from my mobile, even after reading the instructions.

 

Yes I have already replied to these tickets using a letter that was recommended on this thread, and these are another 3 letter of claims linked to the same tickets. I have had no other response.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well you uploaded files 5 times already..

 

Click choose files at the bottom of you post

 

are these the same PCN numbers as the 3 DCBL letter (which were not letters of claim anyay)

and the same PCN numbers as those from NPS before

doesn't look like it to me diff dates.

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I have managed to work it out and re uploaded, I hope this is correct.

 

Yes these are the same numbers, and dates are the same, its for 3 different PCNS.

 

 

Scan 20 Jan 2020.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant you answer in english....

 

yes these are the same...

Its for 3 different ones..

 

Eh?


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am answering in English, this thread is about 3 different pcns, which I received 3 letter of claims for.

 

In the end I replied to all 3 of them with a snotty letter as per instructed by ericsbrothers, back in November.

 

Since then I have heard nothing back until today, when they have sent another 3 letters of claim, hence the reason ive posted back in this thread asking for advice on what to do next.

 

I apologise if I had misunderstood. I thought you meant different pcns than in the original post.

 

yes it is three different pcns, but these letters are for all of the ones originally spoke about in this thread.

 

Edited by Johnshell
missunderstanding of previous post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first three LBCs were for parking on the 07.09.16, 25.11.16 & 18.07.17.

 

The dates are duplicated on the three new ones, so they must be the same incidents.

 

You've already told them to flip off so I suppose you can ignore these.  Time for them to put up & take you to court, or wet themselves.  Seems that at the moment they are doing the latter.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems a bit strong that they are charging you £210 extra for the three tickets. That could be classed as a penalty couldn't it ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm assuming that it's a standard debt recovery cost they have added to each claim. Although it has gone up £10 per letter compared to each LBC from last year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bounce it to someone else, get it back with more costs.

 

going by the amount of recent NPS letter of claims recently

I think their must be an office junior somewhere playing with there pc/printer.

they don't appear to have a clue what they are doing...

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...