Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Served on 16 Feb.   On reviewing the MCOL website today for an updated, I noticed that 1) Hermes has aknowledged the claim, but not yet filed a defence, and 2) that I there was a glitch / error on the form. Essentially, it looks like I had accidentally left the "I will send detailed particulars of claim" box ticke (I thought I had unticked it), with the result that the claim section has been truncated, and some extra text has automatcially been added - in red below):   "...Claimant seeks £XXX, plus I will provide the defendant with separate detailed particulars within 14 days after service of the claim form. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of..."   This is obviously not ideal. Is it better to try to amend the claim somehow, or to just submit a brief POC that a) clarifies that I am seeking £XXX plus costs (which was automatically truncated), and b) sets out my calculation of the £XXX?  
    • Hi   It amazes me how they pass the buck as they don't want to deal with a private homeowner but if the shoe was on the other foot they would be hammering down on you for breach of tenancy.   As this is council housing you need to make a Formal Complaint in writing to the Council Housing about this (as a social housing landlord they have a complaints process they have to follow). you need to exhaust their complaints process. Make sure and title your letter Formal Complaint.   From what you have posted this tree is not just a nuisance but also a Health & Safety risk:   1. The tree being overgrown is now a danger to the occupants/Guest/Visitors to your property   2. The tree has overgrown into the Council Housings Boundaries your property causing damage/endangerment to the occupants/guest/visitors.   3. As the roots of the tree are also overgrown into your property you have concerns that these may be causing/damaging to any underground pipework that may be within the boundray of the property.   4. So far the Councils actions have been to treat their Council Housing tenant as a third class citizen with a private homeowner aloud to cause endangerment/possible damage due to these overgrown trees which are encroaching on your council house property/bounderies.   You also require clarification why you were sent the Healthy Neighbourhood Information which states I have to pay £375 to make a complaint. (make sure and attach a copy of the response that states this cost)   You also require copies of the following:   1. Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Customer Service Standard (not the leaflet) 3. Health & Safety Policy (not the leaflet) 4. Public Liability Insurance Policy. (not the leaflet) 5. Clarification from you if their is any underground pipeworks running through the bounderies within the garden area (you should have full knowledge of this it being your property/plans) 6. Compensation Policy (not the leaaflet) 7. Equality & Diversity Policy (not the leaflet)   When you get the above policies sit with a pen/pencil/highlighter and take you time reading them and just think to yourself 'DID THEY DO THAT' if not mark it then leave it for a while then do the same again this way you can basically throw/write back stating the haven't followed x policy with which part of that policy and your reason. (you are building evidence to use against them using their own policies. I would also like to refer you to The Local Government (Miscellaneous Provision) Act 1976: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1976/57/part/I/crossheading/dangerous-trees-and-excavations     You need to remember yes it is the Council but the Council Housing is a separate entity and is a Registered Social Landlord (RSL)   Is the Council Housing classed as a registered Charity? (what is their registration number whether charity or RSL?)   Also have a wee look at this CAG link:     
    • @rocky_sharma   Fame at last!!   Dunno how much help it would be in your case, but I could try digging out the txt of my defence if you think it might be relevant to your defence. We might hafta do this via PM, then e-mail though if ya wanna go down that route.   Good luck with yours anyway mate.
    • The car finance firm, owned by Provident Financial, voluntarily handed the money to all 5,933 customers potentially affected by the breaches, which occurred between April 1, 2014 and October 4, 2017. It was also fined £2.77m by the Financial Conduct Authority for the way it behaved. The FCA said Moneybarn's actions meant more than 1,400 customers, many of whom were vulnerable, defaulted on their loans after entering into 'unsustainable short-term repayment plans'. This meant that they were punished with extra fees and charges, which many could not afford. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/markets/article-8013573/Moneybarn-pays-30m-customers-failing-treat-fairly.html   dx  
  • Our picks

Johnshell

NPS 3 PCNs now 3 Letters of claim - Lower Feversham St Car Park Midds TS2 1PB

Recommended Posts

there is a mssive difference between the posts, the first  letter on your lot here John is forma  company that was wound up by companieshouse in JAN 2016 so hd no authority to send you anything after this date

 

The newco wasnt formed then either . they were also IPC members whereas the newco are BPA

 

So my suggestion is you respond to the address indicated on the new demands (London address) and say simply

Dear sirs,

your claim relates to a dissolved company that wasnt trading at the time of the supposed cause for action and you have no agency in this matter so Oh flip off and when you get there Oh flip off some more.

I'm sure that criminality wont be suffered kindly by the courts if you are stupid enough to continue with this fraud

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ericsbrother, what send a letter in them exact words? I assume it's best to do it in writing? Would I need to reference any of the claims? 

 

I've been reading some of your responses and they do make me laugh lol!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One in reply to each letter of claim as written above in eb's post

By royal mail only!!

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sending these responses off today, I just want to check one thing before I do so, should I send each letter of claim back with the reply or just reference it in my reply with their reference number?

 

I just want to thank you all for your help so far! I really appreciate it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just use their ref on each.

no need for anything else

though in normal circumstances say with a consumer credit claim, your would return more.


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, little update, I done everything as instructed and haven't heard a peep, untill now.

 

I have received 3 more letters of claim, almost identical to ones previously.

 

I'll upload these now.

 

Anyone help on what my next action should be?

 

https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3Acce92c66-f02c-44d0-a86e-5cfe24ec4ea7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't use hosting sites.

upload as pdf here

read upload carefully.

 

are these for the same tickets already PAPLOC replied too?

 

dx

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 I am struggling to upload as pdf, I cant work out how to do it from my mobile, even after reading the instructions.

 

Yes I have already replied to these tickets using a letter that was recommended on this thread, and these are another 3 letter of claims linked to the same tickets. I have had no other response.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well you uploaded files 5 times already..

 

Click choose files at the bottom of you post

 

are these the same PCN numbers as the 3 DCBL letter (which were not letters of claim anyay)

and the same PCN numbers as those from NPS before

doesn't look like it to me diff dates.

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I have managed to work it out and re uploaded, I hope this is correct.

 

Yes these are the same numbers, and dates are the same, its for 3 different PCNS.

 

 

Scan 20 Jan 2020.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant you answer in english....

 

yes these are the same...

Its for 3 different ones..

 

Eh?


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am answering in English, this thread is about 3 different pcns, which I received 3 letter of claims for.

 

In the end I replied to all 3 of them with a snotty letter as per instructed by ericsbrothers, back in November.

 

Since then I have heard nothing back until today, when they have sent another 3 letters of claim, hence the reason ive posted back in this thread asking for advice on what to do next.

 

I apologise if I had misunderstood. I thought you meant different pcns than in the original post.

 

yes it is three different pcns, but these letters are for all of the ones originally spoke about in this thread.

 

Edited by Johnshell
missunderstanding of previous post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first three LBCs were for parking on the 07.09.16, 25.11.16 & 18.07.17.

 

The dates are duplicated on the three new ones, so they must be the same incidents.

 

You've already told them to flip off so I suppose you can ignore these.  Time for them to put up & take you to court, or wet themselves.  Seems that at the moment they are doing the latter.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems a bit strong that they are charging you £210 extra for the three tickets. That could be classed as a penalty couldn't it ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm assuming that it's a standard debt recovery cost they have added to each claim. Although it has gone up £10 per letter compared to each LBC from last year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bounce it to someone else, get it back with more costs.

 

going by the amount of recent NPS letter of claims recently

I think their must be an office junior somewhere playing with there pc/printer.

they don't appear to have a clue what they are doing...

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...