Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PRA chasing old Lloyds loan - does a PPI Claim reset SB? - **Confirmed Statute Barred**


iwannaclearmydebts
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1612 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'm currently in the process of 3 CCA requests from well known DCA's, but I'm wondering whether to start tackling another one i.e. Thames.

 

I have a VERY big debt (in the region of £30,000) originally from LloydsTSB that I'm paying at £100 per month to Thames.

 

The debt is due to loans offered to me when I was in my early 20's.

I was on poor money at the time (although not much better now...!!) and they allowed me to borrow the amount mentioned above.

As the story goes I fell into bad problems with my finances and stopped paying them.

 

My question is

do I CCA request Thames and see if the debt is enforcable or would this start 'rocking the boat' causing more problems for myself i.e. further action being taken etc..:???:

 

My other thought is that there maybe/quite possibly is alot of interest/charges added into the amount owed and I'm not sure if I could try and claim this back?

 

My main worry is that if I CCA request Thames and they then ask LloydTSB for the agreement LloydsTSB will then try and chase me for a current account that I had with them, which I'm sure I owe about £5000 - £6000 for.

 

Bearing in mind its been about 4 maybe 5 years since I've had contact with them regarding cancelling all direct debits on the account.

I'm hoping not hear anything until the 'Barred' situation occurs, so I'm not sure what to do? :???:

 

Also, just as a point to note the balance on the current account was due to LloydsTSB continuing to pay themselves the loan instalments...stupid really...:evil:

 

Any thoughts/comments would be greatly appreciated.

 

regards,

 

iwcmd. :)

 

P.S. LloydsTSB do not show on my creditfile, so does this mean it is already 'Barred' :???: .

Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of things to consider.

  • Normally CCA only covers debts upto £25K.
  • This will NOT be barred as you have been paying it, hence acknowledging the debt.

I would certainly get a SAR into LTSB and go for the charges and assess the whole debt.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CB,

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

I don't know if this helps the situation, but the debt was originally 2 loans. 1 for £20,000 and 1 for £10,000 (roughly). Thames brought them both and added the amount together (I can only assume :???: ).

 

Also sorry for the confusion in my writing, but I ment to say that I hope the current account debt (I've heard nothing about) would be 'barred' as alot of time has passed.

 

 

Curlyben said:
I would certainly get a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) into LTSB and go for the charges and assess the whole debt.

 

 

If I did the S.A.R would I be risking being chased for the current account debt?

 

and if so, would the charges reclaim be worthwhile on the current account?

 

Sorry for so many questions so late at night..

 

:???:

 

regards,

 

iwcmd. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cas,

 

My only worry about CCAing Thames is that they will go back to LloydsTSB for the original credit agreement and in doing so 'stir up' LloydsTSB into 'chasing' me for the current account debt, which I have not heard anything about in 4+years.

 

Would this happen? :???:

 

Any comments/thoughts on this are greatly appreciated from yourself and other CAGer's (of course..).

 

regards,

 

iwcmd. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As its for two seperate loans I would CCA them (you would need to send two seperate letters and 2 £1 postal orders.)

 

As for Lloyds they have probably sold the four year old debt on.

If you are going to SAR Lloyds the will be able to identify you anyway.

On a loan that size the unfair charges could be high enough to make it worthwhile

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it helps, Lloyds could not find my agreement going back to 96 but admitted they only keep them for six years, despite the fact that the account is still live. Also, Thames contacted by daughter's partner regarding a debt which he had not paid anything on for four years, they didn't produce his agreement either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are Thames worth tackling...? Oh yes. I had a letter through yesterday stating they had wrtten off an account they claimed I owed. I wrote them three emails in total, one outright denial that I'd ever held an account with the, one refusal to forward documents to their fraud team and one refusing to contact them to discuss the matter. I've just sent a fourth asking for confirmation that they had cleared any and all adverse data from the CRAs.

 

I still don't know what the alleged debt was for because they started quoting the Data Protection Act and got caught in a catch 22 (I told them I appreciated their dedication to the DPA, especially since I would be the first to report them should they reveal to me any information that did not relate to me).

 

So yes, don't just give in on them and don't take their word for it. If I had I might have ended up paying somebody else's debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

As its for two seperate loans I would CCA them (you would need to send two seperate letters and 2 £1 postal orders.) As for Lloyds they have probably sold the four year old debt on. If you are going to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Lloyds the will be able to identify you anyway. On a loan that size the unfair charges could be high enough to make it worthwhile

 

Thanks for the advice ODC,

 

I need to decide what to do..:)

 

If it helps, Lloyds could not find my agreement going back to 96 but admitted they only keep them for six years, despite the fact that the account is still live. Also, Thames contacted by daughter's partner regarding a debt which he had not paid anything on for four years, they didn't produce his agreement either.

 

Also thanks surprise,

 

gives me positivity towards this..:wink:

 

Are Thames worth tackling...? Oh yes. I had a letter through yesterday stating they had wrtten off an account they claimed I owed. I wrote them three emails in total, one outright denial that I'd ever held an account with the, one refusal to forward documents to their fraud team and one refusing to contact them to discuss the matter. I've just sent a fourth asking for confirmation that they had cleared any and all adverse data from the CRAs.

 

I still don't know what the alleged debt was for because they started quoting the Data Protection Act and got caught in a catch 22 (I told them I appreciated their dedication to the Data Protection Act, especially since I would be the first to report them should they reveal to me any information that did not relate to me).

 

So yes, don't just give in on them and don't take their word for it. If I had I might have ended up paying somebody else's debt

 

Thanks Quoth,

 

Its always inspirational to hear other peoples stories..:wink:

 

I need to think seriously about what I want to do with Thames, but it has been a great help receiving all your comments!

 

I will keep you all updated..

 

regards,

 

iwcmd. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a letter to Thames 3 weeks ago disputing an alleged debt following their threats of imminent Court Action and the ubiquitous Doorstep Caller. They said they would get back to me. Guess what. Im still waiting. Nothing to do with the fact that not only have they no CCA but the alleged debt is Statute Barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 years later...

Hi all,

 

Been sometime since I posted and always an avid follower of CAG, which has seen me through some tough times!

 

A long story short is I am now (touch wood) in a better position financially with a clear credit file and manageable credit facilities (loan,credit card) including mortgage.

 

I do however have one old debt that I need advice on:

 

Around 1998 - 2000 I took out a big loan for around £20k and then a second a year or so later for around £10k (young and in experienced).

 

Defaulted both around 2003/4, sold to Thames Credit/Atkiv now PRA and dropped off credit file 2009/10.

I did get collared in 2004/5 into paying £100/month until 2012 when it became too much with other financial responsibilities (CSA payments).

 

I only hear from them every 3-6 months offering 70% discounts.

 

My worry is I am fortunate to move house this year and will not be able to monitor correspondence letters upto the SB timeframe and could miss further action being taken, which I want to avoid if possible.

 

I know some people will think its my own fault however my wife and children have nothing to do with this debt from my previous life/ relationship and I don't want to risk messing our good credit up or even worse losing our new home if it went further than ccj.

 

Any advice on what to do please? Should I CCA PRA now to see if they have anything on file or wait until later 2017 (I have the opportunity to re-direct post for 12 months)?

 

thank you for your time in reading my post.

 

BR

 

Iwcmd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do nothing unless you receive a claimform from them, why wake a sleeping dog?

If they are offering huge discounts they dont have diddly squat

Edited by martin2006

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only worry would be potential for a back door ccj at your old address once you move

It could be a wise move to CCA them now, put them in default if they dont supply within 12+2 days, would theoretically stop any future action until they produce one.

 

Wait for one of the more experienced team to advise. DX is good here.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they are offering a 70% discount

then it cant be that enforceable

or mainly PPI/Penalty charges that can be reclaimed.

 

the OC, Lloyds have sold the debt

so that fact stops them off-setting using current accounts with them.

 

you could CCA PRA,

that would serve atleast the purpose of informing them of your new address

but don't do it until you move.

if at all.

 

my gut says do nothing.

 

revisit this if your situation changes etc

 

nothing to stop you reclaiming the PPI

might help the new home situation

 

sar to Lloyds time me thinks...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx,

 

Bit more background on my Lloyds situation:

 

I left an old current account with a big overdraft oweing, which was due to loan payments being constantly taken with no money going in.

 

I don't have a current account with them now only mortgage and personal loan.

 

Would SAR to LLOYDS stir any trouble for my existing facilities I.e. What is the likelihood they would put 2+2 together?

 

Also being so old surely I have no chance with PPI reclaim?

 

Many thanks.

 

Iwcmd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPI will go to YOUR POCKET

as its been sold on.

 

 

an sar will hurt nothing nore no one.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get on with it.........

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi All,

 

Been a while since I’ve posted on the forum. Firstly, I must say how much this community has helped me through some very stressful times in my life. A BIG THANK YOU!!

 

My question is relating to a Sold debt to PRA Back in 2004, which I did pay towards until December 2012.
 

Fast forward to 2016 I move house and started checking PPI on old accounts. after contacting Lloyds I was successful with redress directly to me for a number of old personal loans.

 

Moving on to 2018 PRA start calling me work mobile phone and I block the calls, which bounce to my voicemail and I pick up a recorded voice on voicemail asking for me to contact PRA. This is the only communication I’ve had since moving house.

 

Now a letter has turned up at my new home address saying they have been recently made aware of my new address and want me to of course Contact them either way if I’m the correct person or not.

 

So, can anyone help give their experience to whether they are just fishing because they have a large sum to try collecting on or whether they would be aware of any linked PPI payout even when the debt was sold (assigned absolute)? 
 

Additionally, if they are theoretically aware of a PPI claim, which was paid out to me does it acknowledge the original debt affecting the clock towards statue barred?

 

Should I also send a statue barred letter to ‘test the waters’?

 

apologies for the long windedness of my post.

 

I would really appreciate some feedback and guidance on this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about PRA. They will not be able to have any claim on any PPI payouts. Send them the statute barred letter and under the CONC rules, they are obliged to desist from any further enforcement or collection activity and you should warn them of this and that you will be making complaints if they try it on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bankfodder for the quick reply this has been on my mind all Weekend!

 

when you Say they will be able to have any claim on any PPI payouts do you mean will not be able to?

 

i’ll get the letter sorted and sent.

 

Is there a new/latest statue barred letter template someone can point towards please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

old threads merged for history

you should not ever be moving and not telling your creditors so on ony debt you last paid say within 7yrs.

 

a ppi refund is not a transaction by you but the bank.

so

send our our SB letter from the debt collection section of our library.

 

shame you blindly paid PRA and others? after being advised the CCA returns were unenforceable  mind?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...