Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thats because this claim has not been allocated as yet hence the above hearing *Case Management " to determine the directions (N157 Notice of allocation) which will follow after this hearing. You are not requested to submit a statement but have all the details with you (claim form defence CPR CCA etc etc)   Andy
    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mercedes Repairer


nick7602
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1645 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Team

I sent the car to a Mercedes Repairer and they have damaged the sump, as a result I now have an oil Leak quite badly on my drive whereas previously the car had sat on my drive for a considerable amount of time and no oil leak,

 

now the car is repaired and I have a bad oil leak.......

the repairer has said it isn't his fault and said it was cracked before he touched it and somebody had over torqued the sump plug.....

if thats true, why not raise the concern with the workshop controller prior to fitting the new plug?......

 

.so now the garage has fitted a new sump plug and it shows witness marks of over torqueing ( tightening) the plug and then sends me a video prior to me picking the car up....telling me that I have a cracked sump?? ........

 

.I have told the repairer that a third party engineer can confirm  that the engine wasn't leaking from the sump plug. 

 

I took out short term finance for the repair which amounted to £1k plus with the first payment and VAT paid up front........

 
  •  
Link to post
Share on other sites

And is it true that you have a witness or is that simply an attempt to bluff?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I have an independent witness, this is the engineer that advised me to try and find a repair workshop specialist which I did.......so yes I do have a witness and not an attempt to bluff anyone

 

I have shown the sump bolt and the split in the sump that the repairing garage alledges that they never caused, and he agrees with me why didn't the repairer show me the damage if it was on there prior to fitting a new sump bolt, I would have told the repairer not to proceed due to risk of further damage......

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check that your witness is prepared to give it you in writing – and in fact it from him in writing. Some witnesses get a bit worried about suddenly putting things in writing so maybe the best thing to do is send a message and say will he confirm that… Blah blah blah.

If you can get that then I would suggest that you write to the repairer and tell them that you are going to get independent quotations for the cost of the work and if they will not meet it then you will see them in the County Court. Once you have got your depending quotations then confirm your threat again but this time send it is a letter before action giving them 14 days or you will start the claim.

Don't bluff. If you are not prepared to go ahead then do make the threat.

If you think you are prepared to do this then spend the time from now getting your independent written quotations and also start trolling this website for information on how to bring a small claim in the County Court. It's very easy that you at least need to understand the basic steps and of course you will get lots of help here.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Mercedes Repairer
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...