that claim had already been struckout and the court case was for costs, PE ran away.
remember its a witness statement you are doing
in support of your already filed defence and ripping their WS apart wrong point by wrong point.
SMETS 1 use a mobile network
SMETS 2 use a Government network, which where not suppose to know about 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
As posted early on, if you have a smart meter installed make sure its SMETS 2
I intend going back and getting photos DX, simply because I can't believe that I never saw ANY signs and even missed the machine to pay at. Like I said I've frequented this place many times in the past few years so I think I would have noticed something different, unless I'm going senile
The times on the letter are a bit strange, the entry time was dead on x hr and xx mins but no seconds, whereas the exit was x hr, xx mins and xx seconds.
I don't really want to go through the appeals process online, confirming all my details in the hope they will show the photos, just the cynic in me coming out
Hi and thanks for the info. Update: today received the SAR info - great you might think.
Just a waste of paper: screen prints, NO bills, NO data sheets from the meters, just copy letters of my complaints and their "we need more time" letters. But wait, there is a disc.
For disc you have to install Nero Secure Disk Viewer - use the password sent in separate letter - only to find recordings of misc phone calls by me over last couple of years. Doesn't give any information to me whatsoever regarding this alleged debt. Hopeless. Why it took so long to produce a package of worthless information I don't know.
Observations I did make was a sudden change from being Miss to Mrs on the screen prints, (not applicable) and something in the "contact owner" heading/column, which may be a salesperson as I am not Hannah Leach, and I did not request a Hitachi product financed through BM financial in 2010. (BG tabs for that page: Edit, Delete, or CLONE.)