Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • should have done that a month ago.   dx  
    • Thank you for your response BankFodder.   First of all her employer is a care home and she is a Part Time Carer.  I do not know what the company is called but would prefer not to publish it here even if I knew.   Having read through the link you provided I would tend to agree with your opinion regarding the Estoppel standard of proof especially as she is getting 50% more than she should of been expecting.  Having said that she has had this from the very start and knowing her as I do it is possible she thought this was her monthly wages!    In her everyday life she goes from hand to mouth so there is no improvement in lifestyle unless you consider her absence from Foodbanks an improvement!   I think the solution is for her to repay at the low figure that seems to be in place but to disregard the contract requiring her to pay it back before or on leaving.  Should she give notice and work four weeks how can we stop them from witholding her last months wages?    
    • Hey,   so just received an email from CRS. Saying I have to prove I cancelled...yawn. Bearing in mind this is way over a month ago I sent them a letter! shall I just block them now? Not even respond?   this is regarding gymetc and I joined their gym online...   thanks!
    • What does it actually mean when some  one says" for clarity" you mean in your opinion really dont you?   HB Thanks, girl done well.   Acres of text to get through, are you sure I have not come across you before. Your addiction to point scoring is V familiar.   Anyway lets see if there is anything I have not cleared up already.   You say  "'ll just answer this for clarity (not for an argument). This applies to SDs made in a Magistrates' Court in order to set aside aconviction where the defendant was not aware of the proceedings."   So much for clarity. Below is what the section says information; and (b)within 21 days of that date the declaration is served on the [F1designated officer for the court], without prejudice to the validity of the information, the summons and all subsequent proceedings shall be void.   Notice "Shall be void. not set asidIf I am going to just be correcting basic reading i am not goiong tp conti   "When a person comes before a court to make such a Statutory Declaration the court must hear it if it is made within 21 days of the defendant learning of the conviction."   Noope The regulation says the court cannot interfere with the making of a SD,again completely different   Yes if it is, but unless the SD was made within 21 days of the action they are entitled to question it. As they do in the form you reproduced by asking how the defendant knew about the case.                         Said this alreay.   To answer your next paragraph, the court will not accept a lie, if there is one, they will have the option to increase the time however I doubt they would, or do you think they would just extend it? This is the test, of course.   Again you say SET ASSIDE, it isn't, the new case cannot be started if the old one is still pending of course.   Now having demonstrated your lack of knowledge. I shall move on. Your abstinence from posting is appreciated, either way, I will have you on ignore. Nothing personal I just dont think there is anything you can tell me.   One more thing the result does not compete with anything I have actually said, and everything I have said is correct, in relation to the legislation.                
  • Our picks

Recommended Posts

hey evryone

i am 16 years old 

today i was caught by a undercover guy and

 

have seen people receive letters and letters demanding money from rlp

i have been told i will recieve a fine of 300 pound which is ridiculous for a 2.50 powder

 

however i would like to know

should i ignore these letters or not

 

im pretty sure my mum will bow down to the pressure of the constant letters

however i wont and want to know if these people actually are legit or should i ignore

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no no i wasnt a man was just took a picture of me and was noting my adress and age

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore them totally luxia

 

who said it was a fine 

it IS NOT.

 

only the courts can fine you

and its not going there

 

dx

 

 

 

 


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they said it was up to 300 the man was agressive and grabbed me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nice

and ofcourse totally unlawful.

 

£349.50 is the usual sum RLP try and fleece out of people under some silly civil threats

none of goes to the store

it all goes in RLP's pocket for their next staff holiday paid for by mugs that fall for their twaddle

ignore!!


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou so much i thought rlp was a complete [problem] from the start however will they turn up at my house my family are very broke at the minute and we cant afford our stuff being took away

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't turn up at your house, they aren't able to do that. If you do get any letters, you may want to come back here for support because these people can word letters to sound scary.

 

The other thing to say is that while CAG doesn't condone shoplifting, we also don't agree with firms like RLP trying to run a parallel justice system.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont condone it either it was in the heat of the moment thankyou for ur help the man who vaught me was ver rude and aggressive he hurled insults at me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 He is paid  to keep the store losses down and if that is achieved by scaring a 16 year old into believing the sky will fall in then they will say that.

 

Now the grabbing bit is a grey area as far as the law goes because the shop isnt a public place like the street but nor is it private like a house because the public are invited in

 

that places a burden for the security guard to show that the actions were reasonable as applied to a public place rather than what he thinks is necessary as applied to a private place so that means they follow a code laid down by their employer and the government.

 

Reasonable has a different meaning to what most people think but would grabbing a 16 year old female be reasonable? hmmmm..

 

However the rights and wromgs of the event dont change the fact that RLP have hothing to do with anything and cant even lawfully process your data if you refuse them the permission to do so

 

so ignore anything they send.

You may wish to speak to your parents about this though so any letter arriving wont be a shock to them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...