Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome loan sold to coast


notodebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1636 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

Looking for some advice on an old Welcome loan that was sold to Coast , April this year.

 

There is only £300 left to pay but not paid anything as I knew there were charges on the original account.

I had been paying a reduced amount to Welcome for the last year then all of a sudden they sold it.

 

I CCA Coast and they have sent me what looks like the original document with signature.

There is no PPI but there is a fee of £75 which I believe is admin fee so can I claim this back?

 

There are also a lot of £12 fees for missed or late payments plus other reversal fees etc. 

 

I need to write to Coast as they have taken the £1 postal order payment and used it against my outstanding balance so it looks like I have made a £1 payment of course this was for the CCA only.

 

Can I now claim the charges back from Coast seeing as they are now the official owners of this debt? 

If so and Coast state I need to take it up with the original creditor is this correct?

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say you resumed payments to welcome last year?

when was your last payment before that?

 

most welcome debts are +10yrs old or older now 

tell us the full history of the debt

as you've never mentioned it before?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX..

Apologies here is the background...

Loan taken out in 2009 so you are correct about timescale.

 

Key financial info 

Total amount of credit =£4379.20

Duration 120 months

Monthly payment £63.90

Number of monthly payments 120

APR 13.16%

 

Other financial info 

Total charge for credit £3,289.38

Acceptance fee  £75.00

Interest charge £3214.3

12.68%

 

My signature is on the form dated 20/4/2009.

 

I have been paying since this time although I defaulted a good few years back and have been paying reduced amounts for at least the last 3/4 years.

 

It was £20 per month , Welcome held off all the interest and charges from 2015/2016 so I was reducing the loan.

 

Even when Welcome folded they kept this account going with the reduced payments. 

 

Fast forward to March this year and bal is £383.

 

Next thing I get a letter from Coast to say they are now the owners of this debt.

 

Checking through the paperwork I can see payments started to falter 2014 with bal around £2200. I was making token payments of £10 or £20 .

 

Checking when I first started paying I can see that I have made payments of £65 , this is followed by capitalisation £65 and returns the bal back to before I made the regular £65 payment there are multiples of these up the end of 2013.

 

After that there are random fees /charges as follows 

M16 - Fee - £5.00  followed by capitalisation £5.00 ??

SNT  - Simple interest £ 0.12        - *        

INT - varies but appears to be around £21  *

Q16 - Fee = £ 0.11

Credit adjustment £0.76p ?

Unpaid DD fee = £12

* These appear after each other on my statement ..is this two interest charges?

 

 I got a £1208.44 interest refund (GWI ) in 2015 which reduced the balance down to £1043.00 and continued to pay £20 up to Feb this year.

Hope this makes sense?

 

So can I claim these charges and fees back against Coast now they are the official owner of the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No

But welcome will pull the FCA waiver when you try them

 

Use our search

Type in coast

Get reading up

 

Cca wont hurt!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick update..I also sent SAR to Coast , they have responded by asking for proof of ID such as Passport, Utility bill or driving licence etc , as a side note I recently SAR'd Cabot they too have asked for extra ID to prove I am the alleged debtor. IMO if these DCA's  have been sending me correspondence to my address under my name that is sufficient for them to believe I am the correct person.  Any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you moved since taking out this credit?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

trying to gander sigs they can copy no doubt

send them a ctax bill copy

that's good enough.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type  !!

quote is banned

I know what I said..:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...