Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest coming out of the woodwork - Old Abbey OD.


Nomore Baloney
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1308 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife has been paying off a credit card debt since 2012 at the rate of £5pm.

She has never missed a payment and currently owes £798.

We don't dispute the debt as we jumped through the hoops back in 2011 and it looked, after advice on here that it was enforceable.

 

All of a sudden, Capquest are now sending snotty letters demanding that she get in touch as the 'balance remains unpaid.

She doesn't want to call them and would rather just keep paying the £5pm.

 

Any up to date advice to get them to stop their chasing.

We really don't want to have to get into dialogue and start the inevitable how much can you afford to pay interrogation!

 

As it's under £800 are they likely to get CCJ ish.

We live in rented accommodation now having had to sell our house 6 1/2 years ago.

 

I'm minded to send them a letter saying thanks for their interest but that's all we can afford.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has she written with her current and correct address?

who was the oc?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have our current address.

I'm fairly sure it was an Abbey National personal loan.

Originally chased by Debt Managers and then passed along the food chain to Capquest.

 

The letter says the account may be returned to Arrow Global (who own them) who will consider passing the account to a specialist partner to recover the balance outstanding.

Given that my wife has never missed a payment, that's a bit off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wheres the thread with the cca return in it

You are safe to ignore them unless she has never written to them or the oc giving her current and correct address. Them writing to the correct address doesnt mean they cant file a claim to the old one if she hasnt

 

we normally see the above actions as a result of address phishing before backdoor ccj attempts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had a couple of issues back nearly 10 years ago, so not sure there would have been a seperate thread posted, but took the general advice on whether an agreement was enforceable and after all the info was in from the Abbey Nat, decided it was, so have been paying the agreed amount ever since.

 

Given your advice, might be an idea to confirm our address by recorded post, tell them its rented, and confirm the £5 is the most we can afford and would they consider a reduction to £4?

 

Just don't want our excellent credit score ruined, worked hard to recover it over the last 8 or 9 years - all the defaults etc have disappeared.

 

Do they tend to issue a county court claim for under £800?

 

Hoped we had seen the last of all this shenanigans!

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA's will issue claims for £100...

 

the debt was obviously defaulted more than 6yrs ago so all evidence of the debt is removed after 6yrs

and cannot comeback unless via a CCJ will show the public/judgements section of your file and kill any credit for another 6yrs unless its settled within 28days of a judgement.

 

if they have not legally in writing been informed of a change of address

they are quite legally entitled to file using an old address.

this is why it is so important to always advise of a change regardless to the debt age.

 

as the CCA was to the OC, and you've been blindly paying this to a DCA after sale [which should always be retorted too by a new CCA request]

I would send a new CCA request to them now.

 

that kills two birds.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done  a little digging in my emails here going back to 2010.

 

It looks like Moorcroft were  the original DCA, then passed to Direct Legal Collections.

 

I think it was then sold on again before ending up with Capquest.

 

I'll send them a new CCA request and see what happens.

 

To refresh my memory, I take it they have to show me a copy of the original signed agreement or they can't chase.

 

Is there more complexity to that - I'm guessing there is!

Link to post
Share on other sites

though you knew all this as you'd excepted the CCA was enforceable before?

 

Moorcroft and DLC don't buy debts

they simply chase for their stated client.

 

so eventually it was sold to capquest, part of the arrows group.

 

have you worked out what the debt was and the OC now then too?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, think it was something to do with Abbey National (as was)around 2010.

 

From memory, and it was about 10 years ago, on balance of probability from the advice on here and the info we got back, I concluded that it wasn't worth the risk of getting a CCJ and chose instead to pay them a fixed amount each month, which my wife has, without fail.

 

I see from records that Debt Managers were involved as well.

I remember how charming they were to deal with..not.

 

We had a lot going on back then and this was just another small battle that we didn't need to fight as we had more fundamental issues to address for the sake of a few quid per month!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

open

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a slight delay on coming back to this thread - have been slightly distracted having a heart bypass op, followed by being diagnosed with T2 diabetes as a result of the op apparently.

Anyway, all good now!

 

Recently got back on to this issue and received a response from Arrow on behalf of Westcot.

They tell me that as the account was originated from an overdraft, it was not covered by under the CCA 1974.

 

They did confirm that the account was in default and that the total amount owed is £752.

they also tell me that the amounts that will become payable will include interest and costs, depending on which enforcement action is taken.

 

I still therefore still have not got written proof that my debt is enforceable from them, other than a a vague line saying my account is in default.

 

Any suggestions as to how I progress this most effectively.

Been paying this for 10 years now!

 

PS, thanks to DX100uk for allowing me to resurrect the thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Capquest coming out of the woodwork - credit Card Debt.
  • dx100uk changed the title to Capquest coming out of the woodwork - Old Abbey OD.

stop paying a bogus OD debt and running the statute Barred date to infinity.

until or unless you get a letter of claim, ignore everyone and everything.

 

she's been cash cowed for years on a debt that didn't need paying in the 1st place.

.why do you think a giant multinational bank sold it on for <10p=£1 and not take her to court and crush her

...it's bogus.!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...