Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for the reply - I'm half expecting them to either drop the whole thing or to spring the "We had to tell the court that you don't want to pay so we're going to restart proceedings" idea given the language in the consent order that I signed with them. Going to read up and prepare to defend in case they fancy playing that game. It'd be nice if they would actually play by the rules for once...
    • Hi, I'm not sure if I'm asking this in the correct forum.   Ill try to be brief   - last October I contacted a h2b company that said I was eligible for up to £200 off every window and door. I agreed to a company to come and quote.   The quote was given, the windows and doors installed. The initial installation was incomplete however the people installing said for them to be paid for their part I needed to sign both a form that said what was left and that they had done their part. This form was actually an agreement to release the funds from the finance company. I disputed this.   Fensa came to inspect my property finding multiple errors (improper sealing) in addition to those I found (chipped and damaged beading, poor finish and damage to an internal door and blind). The company returned to fix the issues Fensa identified.    I compiled a very hefty report and sent to the window company complaints team with pictures showing the faults. They did apologise and have attempted to remedy some of the issue.   I asked for a price breakdown in December to check exactly what each item cost. This was done as I had agreed to have sills in addition to the windows and i received capping boards instead (i didnt need capping boards).   The price breakdown shows no indication of any saving made as promised by the h2b company. When i highlighted this to the window company they said what they had provided was all they were giving me. I complained again and was given an explanation stating that they gave me a different saving that was larger than would have been offered by the h2b company in the first place. This was not indicated to me at point of sale.   Being that it has been a year I am wondering if I should contact the financial ombudsman about this. I feel as though I have been miss old this product and the company has been dishonest and unhelpful.   Any advice would be great.
    • Hi everyone,    They started sending threats:   Wednesday:    We have been instructed to proceed formally on this claim in 7 days in respect of the balance due to Photo Studio Group unless discharged or an arrangement made. This will result in a formal Letter Before Claim and Court Proceedings.    Thursday :    It's not too late to stop legal action. Settle the £1182.89 due to Photo Studio Group.    Friday 8:23am :   The £1182.89 due to Photo Studio Group is overdue we are now instructed to proceed with a formal Letter Before Claim.    Friday 6:28pm:   We are now considering whether to issue Court proceedings to recover £1182.89 owed to Photo Studio Group.        
    • Hi Guys, I would appreciate any advice you can give.   In mid September this year we went to a Caravan company to look at potential caravan purchases, we found one caravan that we liked it was a 2018 model,   however when talking to the salesman we expressed concern that the settee and the bed mattress seemed to be of very poor quality and lacked any real support. The settee and mattress also seemed older than the year of manufacture would suggest. The salesman assured us that the fittings were manufacture fitted and that was, 'Just how they are'. He agreed to look into the matter for us.   As a result we paid a £1,000 deposit on our debit card, the salesman asked us to sign a contract for sale regarding the caravan informing us it was 'a receipt for the money we paid'.   We were due to collect the caravan this week, however, during the period from signing the contract we felt that we were being mislead about the furnishings previously mentioned so we carried out some research.   I sent the photographs to the manufacturer and asked them if they were the original fittings supplied by them, they responded that the settee and mattresses shown in the photographs (Taken from the online sales pictures from the sellers website) were never fitted to that caravan and had never been supplied by the manufacturer. I also downloaded the brochure from the manufacturer that showed the settee and bed mattresses that were fitted to the year and model of the caravan we had paid a deposit on, were nothing like the ones currently fitted.   somebody has taken out the superior Settee and bed mattresses and replaced them with cheaper inferior quality ones which seriously devalued the caravan, notwithstanding reducing the comfort and quality of the caravan. He insisted that the photographs (taken from their website) were the correct fittings for that caravan.   On Sunday 20th October, I sent the caravan sales company a letter stating that we were rejecting the caravan and that we had been mislead as to the quality and provenance of the fittings, that we no longer had any trust in the sales company and under the Consumer Rights Act requesting the return of our deposit.   We received a response the next day that stated, they accept the cancelling of the contract however, they are retaining our deposit against the purchase of another caravan from them.   I think it is a given, that we would never darken their doorstep again let alone purchase anything from them. I would add that all our concerns and the company's responses have been via email, so we have an audit trail of what has gone on.   I have considered chargeback, as we paid on a Visa debit card (I know should have used a credit card) and I am aware that we have 120 days to try and implement this.   I'm looking for advice as to what to write to the company to start with, i.e. Letter of complaint (They have no complaints policy or procedure in their T&C, they are also not signed up to the Dispute Resolution Ombudsman Scheme) or a, Letter before Claim, or do I involve Trading Standards.   Any advice from the wise members of this group would be greatly appreciated.   
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

NCP windscreen PCN - Parked Outside Marked Bay - Woodside Park LU Station Car Park,


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 289 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Windscreen ticket (Notice To Driver) - Date of infringement?  8/8/2019

 

Have you yet appealed to the parking company?   YES, after receiving the NTK letter

 

The following appeal was sent to NCP via their website on 15/9/2019:

 

"The photos taken of my car by the NCP attendant, which are attached to the PCN online, clearly show that the two adjacent spaces are of unequal widths. 

I have a number of photos of other vehicles that have also parked on or over the line in the same space AND other spaces in this car park. 

Also, please note that a significant number of the spaces here aren't properly marked. 

 

I have parked at the Woodside Park LU car park for many years and have noted that the parking space by the pay machines near the entrance to the car park is never used, as it is of non-standard width, so no vehicles would be able to park in this space. 

 

Please use your local rep to measure the two adjacent spaces to confirm this. 

This is the reason I parked in the manner I did, as NO OTHER vehicle could/would have been able to park next to my car anyway

- even if one parks within the markings next to the non-standard width end-space. 

General Point - it would be useful to be able to upload/attach photos to the NCP 'informal appeal' portal."

 

Has there been a response?  YES by email (see italic text below):

"Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding the above notice number. We have considered the case carefully and have decided to reject your appeal on the following grounds;

The parking attendant observed and recorded that the vehicle was not parked wholly within the confines of a marked bay.

Your vehicle was recorded as parked outside of a bay. It is clearly signposted that all vehicles must be parked wholly within one designated marked bay at all times for health and safety reasons and therefore would not warrant us in cancelling the notice.

With regard to your comments concerning other vehicles, the parking Attendants do not remain static in one location for the duration of their shift, they are expected to patrol the entire site. A perceived failure to issue a PCN to another vehicle does not invalidate the PCN issued to your vehicle.     

The Terms and Conditions of which our services are provided are clearly displayed on entrance and throughout our facilities, including the requirement for all motorists to park within the markings of a designated bay. We are confident that all signage and the PCN are compliant with all industry standards and to the British Parking Association's code of practice to which we subscribe. 

You now have the following options;
Pay the Parking Charge Notice at the discounted amount of £60.00 within 14 days. Please note that after this time the Parking Charge Notice will increase to the full charge of £100.00.
Payment can be made:

* Online, by visiting https://www.ncp.co.uk/pcn
* By sending a cheque or postal order, made payable to National Car Parks Ltd to: National Car Parks Ltd. Notice Processing, PO Box 839, Northampton, NN4 4AL.
* By Debit or Credit card (except American Express). Please call 0330 088 2902 and have your card details and the information held in this letter to hand.

Alternatively, you can make an appeal to POPLA - The Independent Appeals Service. If you wish to make an appeal to POPLA the forms are available on the website at www.popla.co.uk. The verification code you will need in order to appeal to the Independent Appeals Service is 1234567890 Please note that if you opt for independent arbitration of your case you will lose your opportunity to pay the discounted offer and the full amount of the parking charge will apply. Your appeal to POPLA must be made within 28 days of the date of this letter, any appeals to POPLA made after the 28 days will not be assessed. The independent adjudicator is unable to waive the parking notice because of mitigating circumstances and a decision will be based on facts and evidence only. If you have any trouble in appealing or cannot access the website please contact us on 01604 625 622.

By law we are also required to inform you that Ombudsman Services (www.ombudsman-services.org/) provides an alternative dispute resolution service that would be competent to deal with your appeal.  However, we have not chosen to participate in their alternative dispute resolution service.  As such should you wish to appeal then you must do so to POPLA, as explained above.

If you choose to do nothing, we will seek to recover the monies owed to us via our debt recovery procedures and may proceed with Court action against you.
Yours sincerely,
Notice Processing Team

National Car Parks." 

 

Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) - YES - received 15/9/2019

 

What date is on it?  10/9/2019

 

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence?  YES - on their website for the PCN number

 

Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA)   NO

 

If you appealed after receiving the NTK,

Did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process?  YES (as shown in their email reply above)

 

Who is the parking company?  NCP

 

Where exactly did you park?  Woodside Park on the Norther Line - London Underground Station Car Park, which is run by NCP.

 

I've parked at a London Underground station's car park that is run by NCP for many years. 

It is fully ANPR with two ticket machines at the entrance to the site.

 

I've been given a PCN for the following reason:

 

'The parking attendant observed and recorded that the vehicle was not parked wholly within the confines of a marked bay.'

 

Please note that the bay next to the one I was parked in (my car is the blue Honda CRV) is approximately 18 inches narrower than all the other 'standard' bays on this site (photos attached). 

 

The other photo (of the black car) was taken of the same location (bay) my car was parked in to indicate the narrowness of the non-standard bay next to the 'standard bay' with a vehicle parked in it. 

 

As you can see, there's no way any other vehicle could possibly park in the narrower bay, which is the reason many drivers park in a similar way to the photos attached, either just on the line or like my car just over the line into the adjacent narrower bay.  Also, it is worth noting that I had parked in this way due to the vehicle in the bay to my left had parked very close to the bay line, so I had to leave room for them to be able to get into their car.

 

I submitted an online appeal to NCP after receiving the Notice to Keeper letter, which of course was rejected!

 

I'm now trying to do the POPLA appeal, but have a few questions before I submit it online. 

 

Please note the following details about the case: 

 

I would appreciate if you could let me know what's the best approach to this issue.

 

Many thanks.

 

radmm0

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to NCP windscreen PCN - Parked Outside Marked Bay - Woodside Park LU Station Car Park,

please put your photos up in ONE multipage PDF

images posted directly to screen removed.

 

shame you appealed and named yourself as the driver

bang shot yourself in the foot!

 

its LU land and their byelaws overrule any stupid private parking co imaginary contract.

suggest you get reading up.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Little point in appealing to POPLA as you did park outside the lines and thus broke their stupid rules.

none of these parking companies seem capable of complying with all the regulations necessary to form a contract with the motorist.

 

So all we have to do is find where NCP have gone wrong in your case. F

irst thing is to post up copies of the Driver and Keeper notices.

Then take photos of the notices in the car park including those at the entrance and on the ticket machine if there is one.

Also post up photos of any signs that are worded differently from the others.

 

There are small cars like the Smart and the fiat 500 as well as motorbike with side cars that could probably fit into those spaces so not an argument worth using with any of the parking companies. 

 

you could also have a look at the local Councils planning section on line and see if they have planning permission for their signs under the Town & Country [advertisements] regulations. they don't bother most of the time and it is illegal for them not to have Council permission. If the signs shouldn't be there then no contract can be formed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its railway land

railway byelaws.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LUL/TfL have their own rules so read them first.

 

Also read POFA 2012 so you understand the hoops the parking co's have to jump through to get a claim to stick.

 

By appealing you have given them the rope to hang you with so before you appeal show us the pictures of the site and also the signage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks a lot guys.

 

I'll be on it tonight and tomorrow night, as need to get photos of their signage tomorrow.

 

Unfortunately the deadline for going thru POPLA is this Wednesday (28 days after I received their email reply to the internal appeal rejection on 18th Sept).

 

Rgds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read what DX & EB said about bye-laws.

 

I presume you go there regularly.  Could you have a look at the bye-laws on site (and if not displayed, do a web search for them?)

 

No private company can have interest in land covered by bye-laws, so there's no point wasting time appealing to POPLA.  The fleecers will try it on & try to scare you with their silly letters, but in the end will go back under their stone.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hi all

 

I've taken some more photos of the car park, its signage and the ticket machines.

 

Please also note that the additional photo taken this morning of the two unequal adjacent bays is to show the very reason I had parked over the line on the right, as nobody ever parks in the narrow bay and we all have to leave enough room for drivers to be able to get in and out of their car!

 

I'll take a better shot of the Rules on my way home tonight and will post it later this evening together with the paid ticket for parking at the site, the NtK & original PCN.

 

Thanks again for all your help.

 

Does this link indicate whether or not Woodside Park station is under the TFL Byelaws or not, as I'm a bit confused?!

 

https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/transparency/freedom-of-information/foi-request-detail?referenceId=FOI-2209-1819

 

Rgds.

Andy

NCP Car Park Details.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are all gov't by railway byelaws regardless to the rail operator of the area

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - while they are sending you their "scary" (more like silly) letters.  Expect loads more, that mean absolutely nothing.

 

However, come back here if you get a formal Letter Before Claim/Action.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks a lot everyone again.

 

Hopefully I won't be back for this topic anytime soon, but will definitely return for something else that needs your informed knowledge!

 

Rgds.

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need to be able to read all of the small print so will need you ro rephotograph the signs and parking payment meters again in close up. All you have so far is evidence their signage is inadequate as it is impossible to read!

 

Bylaw 14 applies anyway so you dont have to pay these bandits at all and they cant win a court claim as they have no locus standi.

 

get the decent piccies for further comment/advice and keep radio silence until 6 months have passed and then no-one can do anything about it

 

I believe that there isnt a marked bay there anyway as the paint job doesnt fit the requirements for the TRD minimum.

Now they may want to argue that on road laws dont apply but then what are they using to determine the markings and how you were outside them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd sit on your hands with regard to ever responding unless or until they issue a letter of claim

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, some of the terms are unfair terms and that means the whole contract is invalid if you do not wish to be bound by it.

Do you really consent to them damaging your car?

would any court think that they can absolve themselves from a civil tort for doing so just by putting it in a sign so far down it is not clear? No chance. if you want examples then you look

 

To pick on another as an example,

they say smoking is prohibited

- well it is prohibitied by the law of the land so if someone in the car park is smoking does that mean NCP will take over from the railway co/CPS in prosecuting this.

 

No,

like their mention of railway byelaws, they are supreme not this illegible contract.

 

Filming without their consent?

not their land so what are they ging to do if you film on railway land, issue you with a demand for £100?

I would love to see that up before a judge.

What about your dashcam?

 

they rely on everyone being more stupid than they are to earn an extra payout.

It still isnt a single marked bay so you cant park outside it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be an interesting case EB if an attendant saw a dashcam in the windscreen and issued a parking Charge under  condition 13.7 no filming.  They might be on a sticky wicket with that one.  there is plenty to throw at them if they are silly enough to send a Letter Before Claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Hi everyone

 

A quick update.

 

I've received two 'threatening' letters since October 2019, the latest one dated 2/1/20 (received 8/1/20) threatens that if the 'debt' isn't paid within 14 days of the date of their letter, their client 'may consider' starting County Court proceedings!

 

Shall I continue to ignore or start communicating with them?

 

Thanks.

radmm0

Link to post
Share on other sites

as post 18

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...