28 of the 32 wealthiest countries in the world reside within the EU. Realistically we will need the US because they are one of the few remaining countries outside of the EU that would be worth doing a deal with, but as discussed on here previously, the exact agreement we strike with the US is open to debate. Should we still want a trade deal with the EU we would need to align our standards with them, which makes a deal with the US harder.
Also 80% of our economy is services. Try selling financial services to a person in India... or try sending engineers half way round the world just because some numpty has decided trading with the countries geographically closest to us wont work anymore because of immigrants and sovereignty.
you can't add anything to your ws.
the beavis case is somewhat immaterial and does not apply to your case...red herring they always role out.
i think you can issue a skeleton argument, or use these as notes at the hearing:
the claimant are incorrect in their assumptions stated in their WS point 45 sub sections 1-4 , in that the defendant as the registered keeper is by default liable for any charge they claim. I was not the driver at the time of the incident, I did not enter into nor read by any terms and conditions of any parking contract, nor could i.
the claimant has provided no annual proof of payment that their contract signed with the land owner to manage car parking in 2009 was still current at the date of the incident in 2015 under contract law.
the claimant has provided no proof their signs and anpr camera equipment have the required planning permission from the council to be erected upon the land in question at the time of the incident in 2015
the claimant has provided no proof, they, any resident retail outlet, any managing agent or the owner of the land can or have successfully varied the original granted parking provisions and restriction to ONE hour only from those permitted and stipulated by the council at the time of the original grant of planning.
Sadly no he wont
Theres no plan for no deal as we will get a great deal
No way would he or any Conservative allow any form of border in the Irish sea
No way would he put the NHS up for sale
Well he says his proposals are the great deal
The border in the irish sea is a non-border border not a border border, and the required documentation and searches just like other borders dont make it a border
and trump doesn't want to buy the NHS, just have US drug corporations bleed the UK taxpayer dry through it
and regarding my non-English English LOL