Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement- 21/06/19   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]- 12/07/19   3 Date received 15/07/19   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? N I can't see it   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes a ANPR Camera showing arrival and exit but separate parking machine in car park not at gates    6 Have you appealed? Y Post up your appeal] I am waiting for a copy of my appeal but I have other emails sent i can send  Have you had a response? Y. Email was never sent as they stated on 29th July. Finally got the notice of regection sent by email on 3rd Oct.    7 Who is the parking company? National Car Parks Limited owned by Park24.co   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] NCP, Terrace Road, Bournemouth    For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Not on the letter but found on line its BPA   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, BPA please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   in either case scan up bothsides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONL
    • Not much point in appealing. You paid for 4 hours and stayed for an extra 45 minutes. Goes to show what a bunch of crooks you are dealing with when you first appealed they delayed their response until you came liable for the higher charge and they wouldn't reduce that sum. From now on just ignore everything you get from NCP  and their unregulated debt collectors (birds of a feather). They will try to frighten you with increased costs  that you can safely ignore. In the  meantime please complete the questions asked by dx above and post up any PCNs so we can see if they got them right. Also we need to see their signs in the car park especially the one at the entrance; any that are different from the others and the T and Cs on the ticket machine. Before posting the PCNs please delete your name and reg. number plus anything else that might identify yourself.  
    • Don't forget ... the attorney general (Cox) who apparently advised 'misleading the Queen, Parliament and the British people as ' sounds good to me .. actually said they could ..   He doesn’t much like the idea of staying in the European customs union But said he would be willing to accept one if it would secure the goal of getting Britain out of the EU.    BUT He followed with “If we decided (meaningless distracting time suggestion) that we wanted to review our membership of any such customs union if we signed it – and I'm not saying we will – that's a matter for negotiation and discussion,”
    • Thanks dx   I have emailed the business and I have requested a refund on the form provided by them.   I have noticed on Saga.co.uk there is an article referring to the same website and a paragraph from another motorist who also received PCN for same journey at around same time as us.  'At the end of November 2018 I was travelling on the M 25 over the Dartford Bridge and returning the next day. So I went online the night before and thought I had paid for a return journey at a cost of £12. My Tesco MasterCard shows a payment of £12 to “DartfordCrossingCharge Bristol 000“. I have now had to pay £70 fine plus the correct charge of £5 because the official site did not get my money. There must be so many people being tricked by this false website , sowhy can it not be taken down? The Dart Crossing company isn’t interested. Perhaps because they are also making money from the [problem] every time someone like me makes a mistake?'
    • Hopefully a ditch will be a place of pilgrimage and historic national importance in the UK shortly ...   Off out with a shovel to pick a good spot and dig a trench by the side of the road about half way back from the local watering holes as an offering   ... Pick a good spot where I might get caught short on the way back every Friday night
  • Our picks


Link Parking vs Michal - PCN Claimform - Llynfi Court, Llynfi Lane, Bridgend *** Claim Dismissed***

Recommended Posts

Well done Bris2wales!


Another defeat for the conmen, and excellent news for the OP's case too.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Bris2wales. And thank you for coming back with a great result. Was the signage the only thing that swung it for you.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread created 

please now post here





please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.



Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 09/10/2019 at 11:39, Bris2wales said:

First of all. Sorry for my reply. It wasn’t meant to sound as non cordial as it was.


i won my case. And was awarded loss of earnings. 

It was rule the signage there is a lack of, and the signs that are there are unclear. 

I’m not too sure if I’m allowed to say anything else? Isn’t there like a secrecy act of some sort ? If some one can advise then I will post the transcript.

no secrecy, it is a public hearing so unless you were tricked into agreeing a non disclosure  pact you can say what you want anywhere.

If you can tell us what the decision was  exactly it would be helpful. also can someone contact you directly to get you claim reference so it can be passed on as being a persuasive case for the OP of this thread. that will then sink the cowboys before they open their folder

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

the judge first ruled that my name was spelt incorrectly and my middle name and surname was the wrong way round even through I made them aware, they still issued claim against the wrong name. 

I confirmed to the judge I was happy to proceed.


The judge ruled in my favour that the sign they relied on said “drivers must display a valid permit” 

and nowhere on there did it say you must purchase a pay and display ticket.


the judge agreed that this sign clearly is for private parking, in a residential area or a similar situation where the driver would display a parking permit.


so feel free Bruno to to put in your claim, or even write to link parking or Gladstones 


“in the case of “Link parking vs Michal” 9/010/2019 judge Hywel James, Cardiff ruled that the signs were inadequate and confusing. There were no link parking signs on the entrance of  the car park The only signs from link parking we’re inside only visible after a driver had got out of the vehicle. There are no link parking signs to suggest you must purchase a “pay and display” ticket. Therefor on that basis, no contract was formed with link parking.”


This photo is what they rely on in court!!


no where does it say you have to purchase a valid pay and display ticket. 


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we change the thread name to Link Parking vs Michal


and i will upload the full transcript. I want this to be “landmark” case because ALL link parking signs are the same. They all same PERMIT instead “of “valid pay and display ticket”

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...