Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Guys, we have three days left in which to respond to this.   While I appreciate all the input we've received, at present we seem to be left with more questions than answers so is anyone in a position to advise what to do next please?
    • The only way I can guess that I Go 4 got my details was through a car insurance search website.  At the time of thisCCJ I insured with the RAC,  THEN THE sAGA.  aT NO POINT DID i TAKE OUT INSURANCE WITH ig4 .  They certainly never wrote to me saying I owed them money.  The debt is for £235., so if I did owe,  I would have paid it,  but I knew nothing about it and to this day have never heard from J C International or IG4.
    • Thank you, just received letter back " acknowledging that the account is now Statute Barred, whilst they do not consider that they have breached any law or regulatory guidelines, the account has been withdrawn from their regular collections process and closed. You won't be contacted by us our agents regarding this matter".   Thank you all for your help, nice to finally get it settled.
    • The points are that you believe that a person or court hearing a Statutory Declaration has the option of rejecting it if he or they believe it is untrue. You must presumably believe that the person or court has a duty to question (perhaps more properly, cross-examine) the person making the declaration. You started by saying this about the declaration as a whole then went on to concentrate on the 21 day rule. I asked you to let us know how you have arrived at that conclusion. In particular I asked why you had provided specific advice to the OP in the original thread (a) that she was likely to be questioned about whether she really did not know of the proceedings at all and (b) if she did not know at all, that she was likely to be questioned about whether she really found out less that 21 days before she makes her SD. I suggested it was unwise to warn the OP of something which would not happen. As far as I can recall you suggested that S14 of the MCA provides for SDs to be rejected if they are not satisfied as to its truth and I asked you to show me where the legislation is that provides for this (because it's certainly not in S14).   The position is that a Statutory Declaration must be heard if made within 21 days of the defendant finding out about the conviction and it will be accepted unchallenged. If it is made outside 21 days the defendant states why as part of the declaration. If the court agrees that the reason it was late (as stated by the defendant and without challenge) is acceptable it will hear the Declaration and once it is heard it will be accepted without question. For the final time, the making of a Statutory Declaration is not a court hearing and apart from being satisfied, in the case of a late declaration being made, that the reason (as stated by the defendant) is acceptable, those hearing it have no discretion but to hear it and sign it to say they have done so. No orders are made; no decisions are made; no discretion is available (apart from the 21 day matter I mentioned).   To emphasise the difficulty your misleading information has caused, the latest post from the OP on the original thread says this (when considering her court appearance on Wednesday):   I am hopeful that they will accept that I knew nothing of the earlier proceedings...   She should not have no worry about that because the court has no option but to accept her declaration that she knew nothing of the proceedings. However, because of your advice she has. I am, once again, about to allay her fears on that score and it would be useful if you didn't tell her otherwise.    
    • So ignore any calls/letters off DCAs and try and work with PayPal directly to pay small amounts that I can afford?  Like ive said, I’ve opened a new bank account and transferred my regular in’s and out’s to that account. I’ve removed my old debit card from PayPal but left on there my old bank account info, reason being I’m hoping that makes it easier to send payments to PayPal. Does this seem a good idea? 
  • Our picks

dad52

Parking eye PCN - HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS LUTON AIRPORT, 2 Percival Way, Luton LU2 9GP -lost popla appeal

Recommended Posts

hi, did a few while in the area, did stop a for a while on each and i guess thats what did it..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so double dipping

detection on 1st arrival 

departure on last U turn

 

ANPR system is obv not very good.

 

what date is the letter of claim please


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LETTER BEFORE COUNTY COURT CLAIM is dated 1st october,  vehicle was parked outside from time to time, but never went past the barriers..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so time for an ericsbrother snotty insulting letter by 1st nov on their useless ANPR system that cant handle multiple entry/exits by the same car in the same day


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

would this be best by post or email.? are there any templates to use?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you never ever use email!! nor give them one

just gives them a free way to harass you.

 

EB should be around before your deadline

not sure if there is an example of a double dipping one here in a previous post already


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The car did a few u turns, and stopped outside the car park for a while too on some of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

our custom google search box is you friend

 

x

 

d


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i didnt think it was an  awful letter to PE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the link that dx has provided.

 

The letter from EB at the end is more like what you should be sending.

No point whining over the same thing to PE - they've laughed at you up until now so are they likely to have a change of heart now?

 

You're thanking them for trying to rip you off.... really??

 

Time for you to laugh at them and tell them how stupid you think they are.

 

I thought PE usually used solicitors for LBCs - is this

a) definitely a letter before claim and

b) definitely from PE and not their solicitors?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, deff letter before claim from PE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, then follow the link from dx to get a better idea of what you should be saying.

 

You're not appealing, you're telling them to Foxtrot Oscar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

so something along the lines of

dear sirs,

thank you for your letter dated the xxth of yy 2019.

 

I am glad you sent it because I had been feeling a bit low recently and it gave me such a good laugh i now feel much better.

 

as you know alex Shipp, aka the Parking Prankster very well you will also know the term "double dipping" equally well. 

your £9.99 camera system has failed to differentiate the difference between a couple u-turns on a public highway and a supposed parking event.

 

This has been compounded by a lack of any intelligent input from the person who supposedly applies quality control to things before a demand is sent out.

 

I now look forward to either a letter telling me that you are discontinuing this fools errand or a court claim form.

 

As you have now been warned that any action will be treated as vex you wont be surprised that I will seek a ful costs recovery order even if you later drop this claim because you should have known it has no grounds that lead to a cause for action.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

p.s.

are you still ticketing buses at ASDA Beddington Lane or can you tell the difference between them and people with shopping trollies now?

 

 

 

this is not the only example but was well known locally

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I LIKE THE LOOK OF THAT.LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically you are telling them you have a big stick and arent afraid to wield it if necessary.

With luck they will just go quiet now, you wont get an apology as that would be an admission that their kit is pants and they know they are just crooks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And adding in that you know they are on  a hiding to nothing as you know they know they don't really have any claim and their poxy ANPR by caturing non parking vehicles is putting them in breach of GDPR, which they have broken in your case.  Might be worth telling them they are being reported to ICO for their ANPR that seems to be behaving like CCTV doing general surveillance.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...