Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt that should have been covered by Housing Benefit being chased


jonnyk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1661 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

A friend was receiving housing benefit paid directly to the housing association where she was living until April 2014, when she moved to private accommodation. 

 

She recently received a letter from a debt collection agency requesting payment for around £1200 due to unpaid rent from her time at the HA. 

 

This was the first letter that has been sent, and was out of the blue as rent at HA was all covered by housing benefit, and paid directly to HA. 

 

She sent a 'Prove It' letter to debt collector - they then sent back a schedule of rent / payments that showed housing benefit hadn't been paid by council for the last 3 months of her occupancy.  It also showed that during her time there, housing benefit was paid sporadically, so there might not be a payment for 3 months, and then 3 payments made in a week to cover this.

 

It looks like that the housing benefit was not paid on time by the council over the last 3 months of residency - and this has remained outstanding until now.  

 

She is now getting letters threatening bailiff attendance.

 

What advice should I give?


Any help much appreciated.

 

Kind regards,


JK

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who's the dca?

bet it doesn't say will anything if read CAREFULLY

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

UKSearch Limited

 

Sorry I'm not sure what you mean "bet it doesn't say will anything if read CAREFULLY".

 

Original letter states:  

 

"Dear XXXXX

 

Re: Debt Address: XXXXXX

Type of Debt: Former Tenant Arrears

 

UK Search act on behalf of our client XXXX who has instructed us to recover the amount of £XXXX, being owed to them under their reference above.  As you have not responded to earlier communications to clear this debt in a satisfactory way.  **There weren't any previous comms**

 

If you are unable to pay in full, call us immediately with your proposals for repayment.  We will consider repayment by installments, based on your individual circumstances.

 

If you do not respond to this letter within 7 days , we will need to escalate this matter to recover the debt on behalf of XXXX.  If you call us, we will explain this further."

 

 

Does that help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As i said..it does NOT say WILL anything.

a dca is not a BAILIFF

and have

ZERO legal powers

and even less on a debt they do not own.

 

Until or unless your friend gets a letter of claim from a solicitor

they are safe to ignore everything.

 

Stuff and all they need to do ..

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

From your thread this seems to be the Housing Association that is taking this action against her.

 

Did she end her Tenancy giving the required Notice to the Housing Association?

 

Did she receive any Notice from the Housing Association (HA) or was she in a Payment Plan for the Rent Arrears?

 

If not to above then Formal Complaint to Housing Association and Title it as such. (in the letter ask for the following)

 

1. Rent and Service Charge Policy (not the leaflet)
2. Rent Arears Policy (not the leaflet)
3. Full Rent Statements From XX/XX/XXXX To Date.

 

(She needs to know is the Housing Association followed their own policies to progress it to this stage)

 

She also needs to send a Subject Access Request (SAR) to the Housing Association (HA) asking for 'ALL DATA'.

 

Please note what has been said in previous posts, a DCA in NOT a Bailiff and has No Legal Powers

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Both.

 

I think required notice was given, and I don’t think there was any payment plan - just housing benefit being paid directly to HA without touching tenant.

 

Also conscious that the last overdue rent payment listed was April 14, so 5.5 years ago.  My understanding is that when the age of this debt extends to 6 years old, it becomes statute barred and unenforceable, providing it is not acknowledged...

 

I’m wondering whether it would be better to ignore the correspondence and hopefully this would not be escalated to bailiff, playing the waiting game until April 20, by which time there would be no way of legally chasing the debt?  Could there be a danger of engaging in further dialogue, which would jeopardise the statute barred timeline?

 

Many thanks,

 

JK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find out why Housing Benefit was not paid, by contacting Council. Perhaps if it could be paid by Council, there would be no debt ?

 

Yes hands could be sat on until statute barred, but it might end up in Court before the 6 years.

 

Better to find out what can be done.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

have to get a CCJ to ever get bailiffs involved

and even then there is no right of  entry

so stop worrying.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Please stop worrying again a DCA has NO Legal Powers  and she is dealing with a DCA at present.

 

For Bailiffs to be involved it would have to be the Housing Association (HA) not the DCA that goes to court to get a CCJ (which she can defend if they do) before the HA can even think of getting Bailiffs involved.

 

As this supposed Debt is over 5yrs old I bet the Housing Association has written the Debt off on its Financial Statements & Accounts but it does not stop them trying to chase the debtor.

 

As previously said by others until she gets a Letter of Claim (if she does come back here for advice) I would just Ignore the DCA as they cant do anything as the Housing Association would need a CCJ and then wouldn't employ a DCA if they had one.

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...