Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Honeybee, Yes admitted to being the driver, I am the only person who drives the vehicle and I do use the road in question regularly, so mostly likely it was me.   I have never been asked to produce my licence and insurance at a police station.  I was not stopped so everything is paper based through the post, at no point I have been told to produce anything until the charge letter.
    • I've complied this draft letter. What are your thoughts?. Can they during this time put anything in place to get any court proceedings so i would have to travel to Wales?. Check out the Compton Group LTD who are their litigation team. Thanks and good morning. 20th letter dtw pdf.pdf
    • I'm trying to work this out as I go along. The first thing to do is to think about this not as a car – but simply as a £value. This is especially so as you have said that it is not a rare BMW. This means that you could purchase another one and it would mean just the same to you. You bought the car for £16,000 – and presumably that was the value you gave to the insurance when you bought the policy – is that correct? If that is the value you gave to the insurer then on my understanding of these things, that is the maximum you would be entitled to claim. This is the amount you got so although you lost the car (£16,000), it was fully replaced by the payment of £16,000 – minus, of course, the excess – but that was part of the deal anyway. I've looked at the RAC website for the meaning of the various categories - https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/advice/buying-and-selling-guides/changes-to-insurance-write-off-categories/   I see that a Cat S means that there could be structural damage. Cat B means that the car must be broken for parts. You say you would like to get the car back because you consider that it can be repaired. Personally I think I would be very worried about this because if there has been one inspection which is rated it as a breaker and the second one rates it as having possible structural damage – but repairable – it seems to me that there is a huge risk involved. Supposing you got the car back and proceeded to repair it but in fact found that there was some structural distortion so that the geometry of the car made it difficult to drive. You would then have a real lemon on your hands – and of course you would have allowed a fair amount of money and trouble into getting it going. Apart from the fact that Hastings behaviour is all rather suspicious – I'm struggling to see what loss you have taken on this. You would have had to pay the excess anyway – in any event. You have now received £16,000 payment so you are in a zero-loss situation and you could simply go out and hunt around for another car for the same money. The only thing that I could see which could complicate matters is if you come back and tell us that in fact the car was a huge bargain and that it would cost you more than £16,000 to replace it. But in that case I would have to ask why did you only insure it for £16,000? The second complicating factor might be that in the four months that you had it, he spent a lot of money on improvements and you have managed to recover that. Maybe you could let us have your comments on this and also let me know if there is anything which I've misunderstood  
    • Well today is the 20th so let us know if you have had a disclosure by the end of the day.   Of course you can bring a claim for breach of statutory duty – but in order for it to be a small claim you would have to claim an amount in financial compensation. Luckily under the data protection laws you can claim for distress without having to prove any physical damage or economic loss. I happen to know that you have some experience of bringing a successful data protection claim in the past - which was settled quite advantageously out-of-court. If you want to bring a small claim then I would suggest that you would have to alleged the distress and claim for, say, £50 – but it is a bit early to do this. You certainly would have to send them a letter of claim and give them 14 days.
    • What is the name of the car dealership please – I think you have already been asked this. Also, didn't you record the call? You've been here since 2006 and our customer services guide has been around since almost that time. It is always going to be very difficult to get hold of a recording of a conversation which Incriminates the company that you are trying to retrieve it from.
  • Our picks

johealey

Lowell claimform - old disputed Studio Cards debt

Recommended Posts

It will be the scanning quality.

 

Their letter has a printed signature on, not an original signature.

 

There is nothing that contains my signature, so if you look at the credit agreement which does look like a copy, the only input on there is the date of November 2011, it doesn't contain my signature anywhere on any of the paperwork that they have supplied.

 

Attached are photos of the documents that they sent me - ignore the black mark on the agreement, this was where I went through the personal info with a marker pen

 

 

 

docs2.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you state you applied for this credit agreement on line ....and yet the agreement states the agreement is none cancellable you have no rights to cancel the agreement...mmm?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Does that mean I need to add something into my defence, or is it a completely different approach now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless

  • A document in the prescribed form, itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner; and
  • The document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms; and
  • The document is, when presented or sent to the debtor or hirer for signature, in such a state that all its terms are readily legible.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/part/V/crossheading/cancellation-of-certain-agreements-within-coolingoff-period


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thank you.

 

Do I add those lines above to my defence as well or do I just use those lines above in my defence?

 

Sorry, this is all going waaayyy over my head now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No...retain it for your statement should it proceed...simply add after your comment re section 78 and that they complied, that the purported agreement is lacking all the prescribed terms and therefore unenforceable...then let them try to decide in what way.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check post #41 now I have added it to the defence.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing thanks so much :-)

 

Am I good to go and post up #41 onto the online website to submit my defence now please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes providing your happy with the contents.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fab thanks, all done and submitted - now let's see what happens :-)

 

Thanks for all your help so far,  I will  donate to the site - thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:yo:


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to update you.........I have now received a letter from the Courts, to say that they have received my defence and that a copy is being served on the Claimant.

 

Now I just sit and wait for next steps :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what else does the letter tell you...

 

dx

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so what does the 2nd  Paragraph say....


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

im not asking to see it

I know what it says

you need to READ  and UNDERSTAND  IT..

 

dx

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As an update, I have now received the attached N180 form as an offer of mediation - this is the first time I have ever seen a form like this so I have been having a quick read on the site and will have more of an in-depth read over the weekend and see what I need to do.

 

If anyone could give me any pointers, would really appreciate it and this is alien to me so I now need to do some homework :-)

Mediation Letter Nov 2019.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

oh wow thanks, is it really that simple at the moment :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now received the relevant forms "notice of proposed allocation to the small claims track" Form N149A

 

I just have a few questions please:

  • Do you agree to this case being referred to to the small claims mediation services - yes 
  • Add contact details - yes 
  • Do you agree that the small claims track is the appropriate track for his case - yes 
  • Enter local County Court venue - yes 
  • Are you asking for the Court's permission to use the written evidence of an expert - do I answer yes or no here please?
  • Witnesses - I assume just myself?
  • Would I like to settle your case without going to a court hearing - I assume yes?
  • I can confirm that I have enough information about the claim, to allow me to enter into negotiations - I assume yes?

Would someone be kind enough to point me in the direction of another case similar to this please so I can have a good read and make sure I am doing this right?  Would really appreciate it, thanks :-) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay N180

 

A = yes ...dont worry its not an admittance and most probably wont even happen but all parties are expected to participate.

 

B = Self explanatory

 

C = Yes

 

D = D1 =At your local court you are the litigant defendant

D2 = No

D3 = 1

D4 =Self explanatory

 

Copy to court/claimant and one for your file.

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...