Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parcel2Go package not received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1666 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

I have sent a parcel with Parcel2Go but it has not been delivered to the person. On the tracking options in the site, the parcel is written as delivered, but it has not been delivered.

Now I have read their policies regarding refunds and etc., but unfortunately, I am not educated enough to understand what exactly are my rights here.


(c) it is not possible for us to obtain cover which would give unlimited compensation for our full potential liability to all of our customers and, even if it were, such cover would be much cheaper if taken out by you (rather than us taking out such cover and passing the cost on to you) and, on that basis, it is more reasonable for you to take out such cover from an independent third party. Please note that you are also able to purchase Parcel Protection from us for your Consignment during the ordering process;

(e) in light of the above, we wish to limit our liability for any damage or loss caused to you to a level which we consider reasonable to our low charges for providing the Services;

The Extent of our Liability

6.4 We shall only be liable for damage or loss caused to you if it is caused by our negligence, breach of duty or other wrongful act or omission, and only subject to the limitations set out within this clause 6 and clause 7.

6.5 We shall not be liable to you under any circumstances for:

(a) any direct or indirect loss (including, but not limited to loss of profits, or loss of goodwill); or

(b) any other special or indirect losses, costs, damages, or claims which do not arise naturally as a result of our negligence, breach of duty, or other wrongful act or omission.

6.6 We shall not be liable to you:

(b) for any damage caused by our negligence, breach of duty, or other wrongful act or omission, which you have, or you have arranged to be, repaired, unless it is agreed by us that the repair work is to be carried out and that a repairer approved by us undertakes this work; or

The Limitation on the Amount of our Liability

6.7 If we are liable to you for any reason, we shall (subject always to clause 7) only be liable to refund to you the cost paid for the Service(s) unless you have purchased Parcel Protection for your Consignment from us.

For the avoidance of doubt, this includes any Parcel Protection that you may require in respect of any items listed on the “Items Covered for Loss Only” and “No Compensation Items” lists. No level of Parcel Protection that you purchase from us will render allowable any item which is on the “Prohibited Items” list.

Where you purchase Parcel Protection for your Consignment from us, our liability to you is limited to the lesser of: (i) the value of the Parcel Protection taken out; or (ii) the actual value of the Consignment at the date of loss or damage (as applicable). Where you do not purchase Parcel Protection, you confirm that you accept the risks of not doing so.

I am hoping for someone to tell me if I as a sender have some right to claim the cost of the product itself, not only the cost of the service.

Can I seek my rights in court with a legal advisor/solicitor/lawyer, or no, what do you think?

If someone in the forums has met cases like this and has won them in court, It will much appreciate it if he tells me about it because I will know to seek further help from a solicitor or lawyer.

If there is no chance, it will be much appreciated as well, because I will know not to dig more into this.

Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were you sending this parcel as a trader or as a private individual?
What was the item that you are sending?
What is its value?
What value did you declare when you organised the delivery?
Have you attempted to secure any proof of delivery such as a copy of the signature?
Have you informed them that their record of delivery is incorrect and that in fact it has not been delivered?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Were you sending this parcel as a trader or as a private individual?
What was the item that you are sending?
What is its value?
What value did you declare when you organised the delivery?
Have you attempted to secure any proof of delivery such as a copy of the signature?
Have you informed them that their record of delivery is incorrect and that in fact it has not been delivered?

 

Hi,

 

First thanks for the answer.

 

I am sending the parcel as a private person.

Scarf.

The value of the object is 50£.

When I organised the delivery I declared a value of 50£.

In their site it is stated that the object is delivered and signed by my friend, but my friend is saying he has not received the object and I trust him.

Yes I have informed them and they closed the case due to the fact I have not ordered parcel protection, and because of this I am looking for a legal advise how to proceed next.

 

Thanks,

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

You need to ask Parcel2Go for the sight of the signature. If they produce a signature then you may have a problem. If they don't produce a signature then you have an excellent claim against them for the value of the parcel and you may as well claim for the cost of delivery as well.

Come back here when you find out about the signature

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say yes that they are contractually obliged. If they failed to provide you with a signature then I would say that this would be a good basis for beginning a claim and eventually beginning a legal action.

Make sure that you ask them in writing. Don't do anything on the phone – but if you do then make sure that you have read our customer services guide first. If you do anything on the Internet then make sure you take screenshots or record the screen procedure using some video app

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bank,

 

Now they are saying that our parcel is lost :D and it is lost by the delivery company but we still don`t deserve our money but only the service fee.

Now the problem here is that in the tracking order it says delivered and signed by my receiver, so my question is can I still ask for a signature and adress to which my package has been deliver when they are telling me in has been lost?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say that they have said that the parcel is lost. Did they give you this information on the telephone or by email or other writing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they have admitted that they have lost the parcel – effectively they are admitting that they have breach the contract or have acted negligently. I suppose they are trying to rely on the fact that you didn't buy any parcel protection and therefore they are relying on their clause the you are not entitled to recover the value of the parcel – only the service.

I think that you will have to do threaten a legal action in the Small Claims Court by sending them a letter of claim and you may then be obliged to issue the claim. If you win – which is highly likely – then you will recover your claim fee and also your hearing fee.

It is highly likely that they will put their hands up after the issue of the claim papers rather than go to court for this kind of money.

My general view about compensation/insurance/parcel protection cover is that it is absurd that you are being asked to pay extra to protect against breaches of contract by them. Therefore my view is that those clauses are unenforceable.

Did you send the scarf because you are selling it to somebody? Or you are simply trying to get it back to somebody?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...