Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Less than 1% of Japan's top companies are led by women despite years of efforts to address the issue.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1507 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK Andyorch, thank you.

 

I take your point about Idem's timescales, and that I can still agree to a Tomlin order whether I respond by THEIR date.

 

I have to have a think as decide whether I think a judge is more than likely to side with Idem. I was hopeful that with no credit agreement, and the fact that it was actually Idem that issued a default notice and not MBNA that we stood a good chance. From your comments, I'm not so sure.

 

It's a really hard decision to make as I've always been prepared (albeit a bit nervous at a negative outcome) to go to court. Now, I wondering whether a Tomlin order is better????

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should view this as a bit of a game of poker, and choose to play it according to the hand you hold, how the possible outcomes will affect you,

and how the opposition appear to be playing their hand.

 

If you're clutching at straws a bit and also don't have the experience to use what you've got to best effect, then you should certainly be considering all options open to you. The fact the agreement is post 2007 gives them some wriggle room, so you can't depend on it really.A Tomlin in this instance might be a safe bet for you, but please remember that you do not have to settle for amount they're claiming.

 

Taking this to a hearing will cost them a few quid, and they will be aware there's no guarantee they'll win either.They might even be aware of certain weaknesses that you've not identified and could be nervous.The fact they've offered a Tomlin at all shows they would rather take something than risk getting nothing, or that it would present a commercially viable option for them.

 

If you could afford £25 per month, tell them that you believe you have a good chance of being successful at the hearing, but offer them £1,500 over 60 months under the Tomlin Order.Request that the Claimant pay the £100 fee. You can still pay the settlement amount in one hit if you can afford it, then the matter goes away.

 

They may not accept it though, so you have to return with an increased offer or tell them you'll proceed to the hearing and see how they respond.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for that.

 

The 'agreement' or lack thereof, was in 2000. 

But they've sent other things like an MBNA credit card statement from 2012 and so say, a letter of assignment (don't remember getting that).

 

They haven't provided a signed agreement, but in reality, anyone can see that the debt was ours.

 

I have a month to go, so I will see what I can do.

 

 

 

 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having thought about this, and given their 'good' evidence against us, I think that a Tomlin order attempt might be my best option.

 

I know that there's no proper signed agreement and MBNA didn't ever issue a default notice (Idem did), but given all their other 'evidence', I think our changes of winning this one are slim. Also, having a further 18 months of bad credit is not what I want.

 

All I have ever wanted is a clean credit file.

Once these default markers drop off, we can move on, and just pay the minimal which will just carry on in the background.

If we go to court, and lose, we will have a CCJ for 6 years from that date. 

 

I know I've often had replies which strongly suggest going to court, however, I don't necessarily agree that this is a risk worth taking.

I think the odds are stacked against us.

 

I may have better luck with the other account which Idem have issued court proceedings for.

But for this one, I think I should negotiate a Tomlin Order.

 

Any thoughts?

 

And how do I instigate trying to get a Tomlin order? Court date is mid March.

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have already proposed one in your upload post #163...but you must respond by the 18th Feb

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andyorch.

 

Damn. I misunderstood your comments on post #170 about timescales. I read "don't let a claimant impost time deadlines.........they impose the time limit because they have to pay the hearing fee". I can print a letter tomorrow and get it back first class though so they will received it Tuesday.

 

Is it a case of just filling in their 1-page paperwork/income/expenditure form (as we've gone through the CCCS/Stepchange, I will just add in the same figures which are correct) and wait for their reply? Or should I include a letter?

 

Also, if £2947 is owed, is there a sensible amount to propose owing such as the £1500 over 60 months which has been suggested?

 

Thanks :-) 

 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you didn't misunderstand.....the Tomlin should be on offer throughout and up until the hearing date...but its the claimant prerogative whether to offer or decline...that date deadline is probably imposed with regards to them paying the hearing fee I suspect.

 

With regards to actioning it....there is nothing to stop you contacting the claim handler by telephone tomorrow and enquire and ask if the settlement figure is negotiable.?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that the date as such didn't matter as it was their date.

I'll complete their form today and send it off.

 

My OH is working away this week and without all the information it's not a call he'll want to make so I will have to put a letter together.

 

As their only 'instructions' is to complete the income/expenditure, I'll do that and send it off today so that they can hopefully start proceedings on that.

 

As time is of the urgency, I'd really appreciate advice please.

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something like this?

 

To whom it may concern,

 

Please find enclosed a completed income and expenditure form. As you can see, there is £45 available per month.

 

Should a Tomlin order be considered the way forward, as a gesture of good will I would propose a payment of £45 per month to you for a total of 24 months (2 years) to the total amount of £1,080.00 and the claim be stayed immediately.

 

As is part of the defence and as you will be aware, Idem is still yet to provide a true copy of a signed credit agreement.

 

You will be aware that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974:

 (1)A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless—

(a)a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner, and

(b)the document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms, and

(c)the document is, when presented or sent to the debtor or hirer for signature, in such a state that all its terms are readily legible.

 

To date, Idem is still yet to provide a true copy of a signed, credit agreement. All that has been provided is an illegible photocopy of an application form with generic pages attached which would prove very weak in a claim.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.  

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

The date shouldn't matter normally...its just that it coincides with their hearing fee payment date...thats why its been imposed......but be aware that hearing fees are refundable if the correct notice is given to court.

 

I dont think you are going to get a settlement figure of the above amount given that its a payment plan...it will be the full amount on the claim form + £100 Tomlin Fee.So realistically tou need to be looking at spreading over a longer period.

 

Its not a gesture of good will given you are the debtors they dont have to accept anything apart from the full amount.Time is of the essence here and your letter will not arrive in time by tomorrow...so either yourself or hubby must make that call today and stop the hearing fee....they invite you either complete the I&E or by telephone,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks. It was suggested on here that the term and amount was negotiable so I thought I'd give that a go. 

 

I'll try and call but I doubt they will discuss anything with me and hubby can't have his phone on in work so I will send the I&E off as it should get there by tomorrow with first class post. I wanted to put a cover letter in with it.

 

 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I suggested it.....but not less than 50%...... you cant really negotiate with a letter you have to ring them.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understood, thanks :-)

 

I can't discuss this with my OH until later on this evening and given that they won't discuss his account with me, I have to get something to them by tomorrow. 

If I send off their I&E sheet for tomorrow, I've followed their instructions. Phone calls can then follow when he's back home.

I just wanted to put a cover letter to indicate a Tomlin order being the way forward.

 

 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can offer them any figure you like, but they don't have to accept it. The figure needs to be sensible and should represent value to the Claimant. My own approach is that by offering a lower amount than what's being claimed, the Claimant gets to save on the costs they'd have incurred by going all the way to trial - therefore, the sooner the offer is made, the better really. You can then add in a bit for the fact you may contest things such as penalty fees that the judge may be inclined to knock off. Then you can reduce it a bit based on the fact they will be nervous about losing, so may be more open to negotiation.

 

It's not an exact science, but you need to appear realistic and sensible. Fully understand why you're making the offer and why the offered amount may be appealing to the claimant. Too low and you risk antagonising them - too high and you're giving away money. View it as a commercially based negotiation. If they think their claim is rock solid, they'll be unlikely to budge - but why would they offer a Tomlin if they were completely confident? They will also be aware that even if they win the case, you may never pay up and may duck and dive forever more - it's time and money wasted by them. Just keep it in mind.

 

My suggestion of £1,500 was definitely on the cheeky side, so even that could be taken the wrong way by them. If you want to ensure you're taken seriously, then perhaps knock a third off, or £500 maybe. As Andy says, a one-off payment will give you more leverage, but whatever you offer, if you need to do it by way of a payment plan, make sure it's completely affordable or you may regret it later.

Edited by shamrocker
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both.

 

The amount owed is nearly £3k. And I guess without a signed agreement, there's no definite outcome of them winning, but I think they will.

 

I don't know if they issue the option of Tomlin orders as standard, or whether it's where they think there's doubt on them winning in this case - there's certainly no signed agreement. But it's the best option for us right now if they agree.

 

They expected £100-odd a month on a plan which we couldn't afford, which is where the arrears started; they refused to negotiate and said arrears will build up and up which they have. 

 

Anyway, I realise that this is the 11th hour, so I am pretty desperate here and I have to get something in the post today, husband to call later on in the week. He could suggest £2000 at £45 a month.

 

But first priority is getting the I&E back, which I can do today. Do I need a cover letter simply to say that they don't need to pay the court fee?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally wouldn't even send an I&E...your affordability is none of their business....just make a realistic affordable one say 4 years ? have you actually tried ringing them and say your speaking on behalf of your hubby ?

 

The priority here is letting them know today that you are open to a Tomlin Order...negotiable amount....and to stop the the £170 hearing fee being added to your debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, they said that couldn't discuss it with me, but......after some persuasion I said I didn't want them to give me any information about my OH's account I just wanted to pass a message on to avoid unnecessary action and fees.

 

They've agreed to hold all proceedings for a week until close of play next Monday.

 

But, doesn't that mean that they'll have missed the deadline to pay the court fees??

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

No...as I've already advised you ...they can get a refund with the appropriate notice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. So they'll pay the fee anyway and can get a refund if the Tomlin order goes ahead?

 

Is there anything I can do to prepare for this phone call?

 

What are they likely to ask?

 

The last time we discussed anything with them, they refused to accept reduced payments and weren't overly helpful.

 

 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shamrocker has explained quite succinctly above the options available and understanding how to negotiate...the bottom line is it has to be realistic...affordable and mutually acceptable as per their letter.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was great advice, and I'm grateful for it. Thank you Shamrocker.

 

I just wondered how the phone calls go? I've only spoken to Idem once before (aside from today) and they weren't very helpful and refused to accept our offer.

 

Obviously I want the best outcome possible for us, so I want to be as prepared as possible.

 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last week, I called Idem to say that my husband was unable to call them due to working away and no signal. They said they'd expect him to call next week.

 

In the mean time this letter has arrived. Is this standard stuff?

 

Thank you as always :-) 

letter from Idem 220220.pdf

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

might pay you to await their ws to see their hand exactly before tomiln calling?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting I didn't know re refunds have been abolished since 6 March 2017 with regards to hearing fees....strange they should mention in their letter re refunds and also the question of returning the I&E.....you would think they are telepathic or following this thread ? :cool:

 

https://www.ashfords.co.uk/news-and-media/general/changes-to-policy-on-hearing-fees

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...