Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IDEM Claim Form - My MBNA Credit Card Debt


blondiegirl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1588 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

application form that refs external T&C's that are not present

and anyway, its doesn't matter what they have sent in the past

its what they send in return of your requests since the court claim issuance that's are the only docs they can rely upon.

 

as for the other MBNA card.

start a new thread.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My MBNA card and Idem 'issues' mirror my husband's pretty much.

 

Here's my draft defence and particulars of claim for reference. Any feedback would be appreciated please.

 

1.     A credit card agreement made between MNBA Europe Bank Limited and the cardholder (D)

2.     Claimant ( C ) purchased the balance on the account on 31/08/2012

3.     D accrued balance £ 1803

4.     D defaulted on payments

5.     C issued Formal Demand requesting payment dated 29.08.19

6.     Amount now due from D £ 1803

 

===================== DEFENCE ==============================

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 5.1 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) and no exchange of information was disclosed. The claimant did not respond within the given 30 days pursuant to 5.2 of the PAPDC and proceeded to issue the claim irrespective pursuant to 5.2.It is respectfully requested that the Court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC

 

3. Paragraph 1 is noted; I have in the past had financial dealings with MBNA on or about 1997. I am unaware of the alleged agreement  the Claimant refers to having failed to adequately particularise its claim, and have therefore sought clarity from the Claimant by way of a Section 78 request and a CPR 31.14 request.

 

4. Paragraph 2 is noted but it is denied that I was ever served Notice of Assignment pursuant to sec 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925 at the time of the Assignment dated 06/10/2016.

 

5. Paragraph 4 is denied. I am unaware of any service of a Default Notice (s) pursuant to section 87 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 by the original creditor MBNA. I have sought verification from the claimant regarding this matter and they have been unable to comply.

 

In response to my section 78 request for the MBNA agreement, an application form, which refers the applicant to sign and return the agreement. It is barely legible  and was provided along with a reconstituted version which is void of an account number or date to which it supposedly refers to. Both of which are pre-April 2007 credit applications and therefore unenforceable pursuant to sections 61.1 a/b/c.and 65.1 and sections 127.1.

 

The claimant completely disregarded my CPR 31.14 request.

 

6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant; the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement ; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of any breach and service of Default Notice pursuant to sec 87.1 CCA974;

(C) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

  

9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. Just wanted to post another link for you. This particular thread has all the relevant information from the start of the claim right to  the court hearing itself. I am sure you will find plenty of information to help your own situation.

 

 

Good luck 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for everyone's help so far.

 

I didn't ever think that this would go to court so I am very daunted by this. My OH has always trusted me on this saying "I hope you know what you're doing" so suffice to say, if he had to go to court (which would not go down well at all when I tell him) he won't have a clue - I am the one who's sent all the letters and took this fight on. 

 

So far, I have read 3 positive outcome threads on here, all from differing cases I know, but similar to ours: Original creditor (MBNA) not issuing a DF Notice but the debt collector did (Idem), and there isn't a 'correct' agreement - just a signed application form and no assignment notice was ever sent.   

 

So, this might be a million dollar question, but what are our chances? Do people go to court armed with all this info and get told that they have to pay, even if there's no credit agreement or DF notice? Do charges get put on the house?

 

All I ever wanted was to try and clear our credit file up, not potentially make it worse. The way I see it now, is that we/he has to go to court (stressful to say the least) then we could get a CCJ and a charge on our property. 

 

 

 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

When anyone is served with a court claim the upshot can only be one of three outcomes...

 

You do nothing and receive a CCJ by default...automatic.

You defend it and put the assignee to strict disclosure....you win or lose

You are afforded mediation to possibly settle the claim without a CCJ.

 

By defending it you halved the chances of a CCJ straight away...the claim could be stayed or discontinued.....or you could win depending on your defence and subject to how the claimant responds....or by defending you have opened the option to mediation were you could agree a settlement without a CCJ.

 

So your actions so far have been quite right in dealing with this claim....to have done nothing you would now have a CCJ.

 

As for you husband and stress and fear of courts you can attend court with him and hold his hand..it's no worse than a visit to the dentists IMHO.:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant get a charge on your joint property that harms you for a debt that is not joint

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re. post No. 302 posted on 2nd October

 

I wonder if anyone has had a chance to look at this please? I need to respond soon on the money claim website following receipt of Idem's claim 11th September.

 

It is a direct copy of my husband's, however, there doesn't seem to be any differences in our cases.

 

Thanks.

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean your proposed defence?

andy ok'd it in the next post

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All submitted and received by the Court - thanks all.

 

Incidentally:

I have another Idem/MBNA account which I was waiting for a Claim Form for. However, Idem have written to inform me that this idem account has been purchased by Hoist Finance UK.  I had assumed that they'd go down the Court route with this, but I was wrong. Do I wait and see what Hoist hit me with? This account *seems* to have a properly signed credit agreement.

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

New thread for this one please...dont post here with regards another MBNA agreement.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I haven't sent my N180 paperwork back to the Court yet (due next week) but Idem have sent me a copy of theirs.

 

They have ticked 'no' to mediation and have informed me that they're requesting a hold on proceedings for a month so that they can attempt settlement. 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the claimant has to have a copy of yours

omit phone/email/sig on their copy.

get it done

don't await the deadline date.

 

as you'll see in another idem claimform thread just below yours

the idem N180 no to mediation and wanting 1 month

needs to be objected to.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have already covered this on your other thread.

 

You can only request a months stay on the N181 Fast track DQ...not Small Claims N180....whether they actually allow it is at the courts discretion.


Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

IDEM must think all claims are Fast Track :becky:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The form has been sent. The Court will have this tomorrow.

I'll look at the other thread when I'm on a PC.

Does it benefit us to object to their request?

 

I've been searching for this other post.

Sorry to be a pain dx100uk, which thread?

I'd like to read about what happened there.

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was yours as per my post #323

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 23/10/2019 at 15:16, dx100uk said:

and the claimant has to have a copy of yours

omit phone/email/sig on their copy.

get it done

don't await the deadline date.

 

as you'll see in another idem claimform thread just below yours

the idem N180 no to mediation and wanting 1 month

needs to be objected to.

 

 

Hi everyone.

Help please!

I can't find this other claimform thread and want to object purely to have more evidence about their competence.

I am quite happy to wait as I don't relish going to court, but anything to point out their mistakes.

 

Andy mentions post #323 but I can't see a post #323 on either of my posts.

 

Reading through a couple of other posts, I can't see where anyone wrote to object to this.

 

I've checked on the money claim site last week and there's no update pertaining to them wanting more time so these could be their standard tactic (lies).

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

last but one post by andyorch

your post no's are diff to what we see.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked up my claim online and it's been updated to say:

 

Your defence was received on 11/10/2019 at 14:05:12

DQ sent to you on 14/10/2019

DQ filed by claimant on 04/11/2019

 

What have they filed on the 4th? I don't understand DQ.

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

their Direction Questionnaire N180,

which like yours should be copied to them,

they should send a copy of their completed N180 to you. 

 

but as it was only filed on the 4th bit early to get it in the post yet.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...