Jump to content


VCS PCN - no stopping - spycar CCTV - Liverpool Airport "offence"


Hobnail
 Share

Recommended Posts

If the claim was issued on the 3rd of november is it not too late to file a defence?

 

From what I can gather we had 14 days acording to the MCOL website.

 

Although I thought I had 33 days?

 

Confused.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you did AOS as i advised earlier, you have a total of 33 days whereby date on claimform is ONE in the count.

 

this was explained carefully in the Q&A you filled in in the 1st place and in my AOS/cpr post.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 08/11/2021 at 19:22, Hobnail said:

Name of the Claimant : VCS

 

Claimants Solicitors: ELMS LEGAL

 

Date of issue – 4 NOV 2021

 

Date for AOS – 22 NOV 2021

 

Date to submit Defence – 6 DEC 2021

 

What is the claim for –

 

1. A breach of contract for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land.

 

2.Defendants vehicle was identified in Liverpool John Lennon Airport on 30/08/2019 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited .

 

3.At all material times the defendant was the registered keeper and/or the driver.

 

4.The terms and conditions upon entering private lane were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct.

 

5.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply, namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability.

 

6.claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice , contractual costs and interest.

 

What is the value of the claim?

 

Amount Claimed £160

court fees £35

legal rep fees £50

Total Amount  £245

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes got it Aos was done so we are okay until the 6th of December.

 

I'll throw a defence together using something from the forum for the MCOL Defence Particulars box and post it here to get some feedback.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found this.................

 

1.  It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle].

 

2.   As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.  The proper claimant is the landowner

 

3.  It is denied that the Defendant breached any terms and conditions set on private land.

 

4.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant, or broke any such contract.

 

5.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

 

Please delete the one above.

 

How is this?

 

It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle].

 

The driver of the vehicle had not been established. None of the photos give any indication of who was driving.

 

It is denied that the Defendant breached any terms and conditions set on private land.

 

It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant, or broke any such contract.

 

The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope use our std 3 -5 line defence in every no stopping thread already here.

 

dx

 

30 minutes ago, Hobnail said:

Found this.................

 

1.  It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle].

 

2.   As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.  The proper claimant is the landowner

 

3.  It is denied that the Defendant breached any terms and conditions set on private land.

 

4.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant, or broke any such contract.

 

5.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

thats the one!!

 

whatever made you think the other was correct. not searching outside of CAG are we...:pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Confused now.

 

I was right first time? or second time?

 

So many pages to trawl through trying to find a relevant one. Both are off the forum and not from anywhere else though.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First one methinks as I edited one for the second attempt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think poss the 2nd might have been from a very old thread, things have moved on

 

but please let the experts check and advise....youve a few days yet

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I'm going to post this on the MCOL website as my Defence Particulars.

 

1.  It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle].

 

2.   As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.  The proper claimant is the landowner

 

3.  It is denied that the Defendant breached any terms and conditions set on private land.

 

4.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant, or broke any such contract.

 

5.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

 

Is there anything else I should doing?

 

I did receive a letter from ELMS over the weekend regarding my CPR 31.14 request.

 

They only sent me 3 photos of my partners car stopped at the airport and 5 of the PCN's from VCS.

 

So none of the document requested in our last letter.

 

Should I post it up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No that's more than enough, Less is More at this stage, its only a skeleton Defence needed real meat comes at Witness Statement stage if it gets that far.  Just hold fire until a couple of the other's looks in.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always best scan up anything they send to one mass pdf.

you never know wholl spot what

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't do a counter claim do i?

 

What about any aditional details on the MCOL form.

 

They have partners name, addres and d.o.b only.

 

cheers

 

 

So here is the latest letter from Elms responding to my CPR 31.14 request.

 

They also sent me 3 photos of my partners car stopped at the airport and 5 or 6 of the PCN's from VCS.

 

Plus copies of my snotty letter to them and a copy of VCS's letter to us telling us Elms will be dealing with it.

 

I haven't posted them as the PCN's are already in the thread and the letters are just copies.

 

They cannot send requested documents as they don't exsist. No contract.

 

Cheers

 

 

elms reply to CPR.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you never counterclaim no. you've not seen that mentioned here either.

 

please try and remember to use pdfmerge website , ive merged single pages for you above again.

 

34 minutes ago, Hobnail said:

What about any additional details on the MCOL form.

 

They have partners name, address and d.o.b only.

 

cheers

not sure what you mean?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO!!

the only people you dont give those too are the fleecers.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give full details to mcol

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not for a good few weeks/months if at all.

 

however the court will write upon whats next and should ACK your defence filing.

 

no harm in you reading as many no stopping 

threads as you can HERE.

 

then you'll know what MIGHT be to come and how to deal IF it does progress through the various stages of the claim.

however as always, dont ever do anything toward anyone without check here 1st 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Okay so last week we received the N180 from from the C.Court.

 

Proposed allocation to the small claims tracks.

 

Reading the other threads I can see I respond with the following.

 

Mediation - NO

 

Small claims Track - YES

 

Hearing venue - leave blank as they will sent me to my local c.court?

 

Expert evidence - NO

 

Witnesses - ONE

 

Hearing - NO

 

If these are correct my other half should sign and send back to northampton?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you state your local court

 

and yes to a hearing...you dont want a papers only decision.

 

3 copies

1 to the court

1 to there are using one (omit phone/sig/email

1 for you file

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...