Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes when you get your N180 from the court. on the sols copy omit phone/sog/email.
    • you dont need a copy of the letter. just proof. it might pay you to sar SLC as if they had your correct address on record before loan sales to erudio , that will add another very strong string to your bow toward setting aside this backdoor CCJ and the arrows you'll fire at Arrows (Erudio are arrows DCA in sheeps clothing)   you also might like many others find that you still have access to the online SLC portal. that could be useful with info. like deferral dates etc and address and what they knew and when.   at present you are in the info gathering stage, the more of that you can get the better.
    • IMHO i would never have a DD setup for any consumer credit debt. they are not a priority, like mortgage/rent/CTAX/Gas/Electric.   this gives you a bit more work to do, but it ensures there is always money for the priority things that can threaten the roof over your head or it's the necessary home utils needed with one.   it's also worthy to note that somethings that are unconscious priorities (though NOT!) like mobiles/phone/digital tv and broadband etc DD's often contribute to the real priorities not being paid. careful management of those needs to be exercised, like moving their payment dates to after the priorities are deal with in your calendar, or vice versa move the priorities to before those come out.   it is stunningly amazing how many families fall into priority bill debts by blindly pay these 'mentally essential luxury gadget' bills and are in total ignorance of the effect they have upon their available funds as 'they can't live without them'.
    • Just as UB says, he bailiff does not need to be invited in, but he certainly should have announced himself. i dont suppose he said what the enforcement was for?   The bailiff has to have a "reasonable belief" that the debtor resides at your address, if he is permitted to enter.   In the first post you say the Warrant was addressed to next door, is this your daughters property and did this Richard live at that address or your address.?   We should find out what the bailiff may say to try and justify his actions.    
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Received a PAP from Moriarty Law


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 499 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Flyingblind.

 

Best to start new thread, as each persons case will differ.  We don't want several peoples cases on one thread, as it then becomes confusing.

 

Don't respond to the PAP until you have gone through some basic info, so understand way forward.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning all,

I have received a PAP from Moriarty Law.

 

I have been approached by IDRWW and CWD in the past, but they all went quiet once I sent them a budget summary as per the guidance of the national debt helpline. .

 

After reading though this forum, I now realise that this may have been a mistake.

After receiving the PAP from ML, with little understanding, I also sent them a budget summary, but now I realise that this isn't the correct way to handle them.

 

What shall I do now going forward?

Should a reply using the guidance supplied by @dx100uk

 

Any help would be much appreciated, as this is now creating a lot of stress and anxiety.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What type of debt e.g. credit card, mortgage, current account overdraft ?

 

When did you last make any repayments approx. ?

 

Did you acknowledge owing the debt in any written communications to IDRWW/CWD or ML ?

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @unclebulgaria67

 

Thank you for the response.

 

It is a combination of a loans and credit cards and a payment hasn't been made since March 2015.

 

To the best of my recollection, I have never formally acknowledged the debt, especially not the outrageous interest, in a written form but I have spoken to them over the phone in the past.

 

I now know that this isn't ideal, but even on the phone, I dont actually remember acknowledging the debt.

 

Up till now, I have always followed the guidance of the national debt helpline and other debt help companies, one of which, told me to go into an IVA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

god some of these debt advice charities need shooting...

 

when did you get this PAP LOC

and you replied to it with their reply form or by any other letter?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received the PAP few weeks ago but our most recent correspondence was yesterday via email and telephone (before seeing your forum). After reviewing my budget summary, they wanted a list of my assets (I only have my house, which is under mortgage) and 3 months bank statements. I told them that I wanted to go and seek guidance before committing anything else. They said fine and that the 30 days would restart then. (yesterday - 10th Oct)

 

I haven't sent anything back in regards to the original PAP

Edited by flyingblind31
Link to post
Share on other sites

Then imho follow our guide as post 5 there

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this is a really stupid question.

 

Do I need to add this statement to section I as well?

"Any and All other statutes of law, be them UK or otherwise, that the claimant intends to rely upon should they wish to  proceed and issue a uk Court Claim"

 

Thank you in advance..

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 5

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I have followed your guidance and prepared my response. What I meant was, does this statement need to be added onto the reply.

 

"Any and All other statutes of law, be them UK or otherwise, that the claimant intends to rely upon should they wish to  proceed and issue a uk Court Claim"

 

Sorry for being a pain, I'm just not clued up at all in such matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its in out pap reply for these debts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...