Jump to content


G24 ANPR PCN - B&M Meadow Street retail park, Falkirk, FK1 1RP SCOTLAND


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1688 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I need a little piece of advise that is upto date , I live in scotland and have received a parking charge for over staying the time allowed.

It was a B&M carpark and I was caught on camera.

So far I have ignored all letters and I have not made contact to any of the letter senders.

 

My last letter is from Gladstones Solicitors stating that they have been instructed by G24 LTD to recover the £150 that is owed to them.

 

What should my next course of action be?

 

thank you

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore you are in scotland

pofa does not apply

there is no right of trespass either.

 

should you ever receive a letter of claim

comeback here 

 

please complete this even so:

 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not a letter of claim

not Gladstone brooks either

they are PPI reclaimers and not solicitors.

 

 

 

can you get that link in post 2 done please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

.............................

 

For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]

 

please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement............09/02/2019

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]..... yes

 

3 Date received........ 15/02/2019

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]...... N

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?...........yes

 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]..........   N

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

 

7 Who is the parking company? .......G24 LTD, PO BOX 3320, Gerrads Cross, Bucks.

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]   .......... B&M Meadow Street retail park, Falkirk, FK1 1RP

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to G24 ANPR PCN - B&M Meadow Street retail park, Falkirk, FK1 1RP SCOTLAND

topic title updated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That letter isn't even from Gladstones though. They have a cosy arrangement with DRP who use their letterheads - makes them look a bit more official and sometimes frightens people into paying. Just bung it in a folder with the other paperwork from them and keep it all safe in case they ever decide to try their luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

now DR+ arent the client and arent registered with the FCA as a licenced deposit tajer to why Gladdys allow their letterhead to eb used in this sort of caper is beyond me.

 

CEL used to get a retired solicitor to allow them to use his name when filing court docs to bump up their bill but the courts adn the SRA got wise to that and they got al of their claims dismissed for protocol reasons and he got booted off the SRA roll of solicitors.

Now Gladdys wont be daft enough to say DR+ are their clients when it comes to a court claim but they do like to spread the money about to keep all of the less than honest parties sweet

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...