Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NHS Debt


lancer44k
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1701 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Been a little while since I last posted on here, so not sure if this is in the correct sub.

 

My wife and I went through a two fully-funded (by the local NHS trust) cycles of IVF back in 2014 resulting in the birth of our beautiful baby girl in 2015. At the time, we were asked if we would like to retain the additional embryos for a ten year period (the maximum allowed I believe under HEFA rules) and at the time I recall ticking the box for 10 year storage on the HEFA form.

 

All is well, until I received a letter (actually, its in my wife's name and there is no mention of me) back in March from our local trust with an invoice demanding payment of £230 for the storage for 2016-2017 and then an additional invoice for £360 for the storage between 2018-2019.

 

I phoned the trust's accounts department who explained that after the initial treatment, the storage of embryos moves to a private patient plan.

They informed me that at the time of agreeing to the storage I would have signed a copy of private patient agreement with an outline of the charges etc and in effect agreeing to the storage etc.

 

At the time, I couldn't recall signing anything other than the HEFA form and didn't remember seeing any charges etc.

I asked for a copy of the form agreeing to the private storage and then left it in their hands.

 

They called back around a week later after speaking with the clinic to inform me that they couldn't find any record of the form other than the original HEFA form.

They told me not to worry about the charges and they would check archives again.

 

Heard nothing back, until I received a letter today from CCI Credit Management for the full amount above.

Just looking for advice on the best way to tackle this?

 

The letter specifically mentions dealing with the DRA from this point forward.

What should I be asking for in terms of seeing if this debt is enforceable?

 

It also throws up a bit of a grey area, as from my understanding,

even if the debt isn't paid or we don't agree to the charges,

they can't destroy the embryos without getting court approval

(please correct me if I'm wrong on this one).

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

Lancer44k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have moved your thread to the NHS Forum as the debt will still be with them and not assigned to CCI Credit Management which you should Ignore.

 

Deal Direct with the Trust.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

Many thanks for taking the time to reply. If I remember correctly, you helped me out back in 2013... wow, seems like yesterday, how time flies!

 

What do you think I should be asking the Trust for in terms of documentation?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it so long....? .yes I do recall your username.

 

Best to start off with a DSAR to the Trust and get all your data...then take it from there...but do not get involved with CCI ...they are mere ambulance chasers...pardon the pun.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have any experience of SARs but I do have experience of working in a NHS trust Finance Dept.

 

To have raised two invoices in March (at least one of them backdated) they would have needed some supporting documentation.  I presume this should be whatever you signed notifying you of the charges (if indeed you signed anything).  That's what you need to see and it is "interesting" that they seem to be unable to supply you with a copy.  (I presume it will come to light under a SAR if in fact it exists - which it may do as you may have forgotten it).

 

If I read your OP correctly, storage started in 2015.  If the charges are legitimate you should have been charged for the financial years 2018/19, 2017/18, 2016/17, 2015/16 and (possibly - depending when storage started) 2014/15.  But you've only been charged for 2016/17 and 2018/19.  Where are the other invoices - or have you got your dates wrong?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Maxman. I may have gotten my dates wrong, I'm going to go and pull the invoice that they sent to double check. Myself and my wife definitely can't remember signing anything relating to ongoing storage charges, or charges relating to any future services provided as a private patient.

 

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...