Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell claimform - old O2 mobile debt *** Claim Discontinued***


Escaped
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

who says you've got to pay anything?

it's not even been allocated yet to a court

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

2 hours ago, Escaped said:

so what do you suggest i do, if they do not have evidence of  account, assignment and other docs, then why should i pay.  you advised me to wait for the court to contact me, after that then what is the next step? 

 

 

Well if you were to read the 100s of threads surrounding yours and the 1000s in the Legal Success Forum you will see the process and how it works.

 

But here's an abridged version so you dont have to do any self research.

 

Claim Form issued

Defence submitted

Claimant informs court they wish to proceed 

Direction Questionnaire N180 sent out

Direction Questionnaire N180 submitted and served.

Court serves Notice of proposed allocation to small claim track N149 with offer of mediation ..if mediation fails or does not happen move to next

Court served Notice of Allocation with the courts directions (Disclosure of Documents and Witness statements) on preparation for trial with hearing date (N157) 

Hearing takes place. 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

not been reading up then as advised?

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Escaped said:

I have received the form questionnaire to mediate, do I agree to this?

I finally got a response back from BT and they are looking for my documents and the account. ,maybe I hear from them soon.

 

The court expects both parties to participate and try to mediate without court...but even if you tick yes.....it most probably wont happen because you dont have any relevant paperwork at this stage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless an sb'd defence is filed, just about every claimform thread advises to agree to mediation and shows how to fill out the n180..

 

yes to mediation

1 wit you

 

the rest is obv

 

3 copies

1 to the court

1 to their sols [lowells in this case] minus phone/email/sig]

1 for your file

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

response from Lowell: please advise next steps.

Tomlin order attached. 

 

The Equifax shows that the account was in default as of April 2016.

They cannot provide me with any other supporting docs.

I have not received  the SAR back from BT. 

the credit report also shows my birthday is 10 yrs younger ( I wish!)

Account was closed in Oct 2016.

Equifax shows DUU and nothing more.

if I settle this, what should I ask for, a settled status, or satisfied?

 

Lowell Writes:

the current debt relates to a former 02 (UK) Ltd account, with our reference number xxxxxxxx and former 02 account number xxxxxxxx.

The agreement was taken out on or around the 23 September 2015 and related to a mobile telephone number xxxxxxx.

 

We note the contents of your Defence.

You state that you deny that you are indebted to our Client.

You state that our Particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature.

We hereby confirm that the Particulars of claim provide sufficient information to enable you to properly assess your position with regards to the claim and are fully compliant with Part 16.4 of CPR.

The Particulars of claim include a precise statement of the facts on which our Client relies upon.

 

We note your request for a copy of the Agreement.

Please note, as this is a former telecommunications account which is not regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, there is no legislative requirement to the original creditor 02 (UK) Ltd to retain a copy of the Agreement.

Our Client has also no access to any copy of it as this was not provided by the original creditor to our Client.

 

You claim you did not receive repeated requests for payment, please find enclosed reconstituted copies of letters in attempts to contact you. The letters which were sent to you contained all the necessary information in relation to our client's contact details.

 

We note that you state that you have not received a Notice of Assignment and claim our client has sold this debt to BPO Collections on 5 April 2019. Please find attached a reconstituted copy of the Notice of Assignment.

 

You have been informed that the debt was legally assigned to our Client Lowell Portfolio I Ltd and all further payments should be made directly to our Client.

This debt was assigned to our Client Lowell Portfolio I Ltd on 31 October 2016.

 

We note your request for the Default Notice.

A Default Notice is a technical document, which is required under the provisions of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

The outstanding debt relates to a former telecommunications account which is not regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

As such, no Default Notice is required to be served on you.

 

Should a customer fail to repay their mobile phone bill, then they have breached their service agreement and would be issued with a suspension notice, following which the service would be disconnected.

 

Please find enclosed a list of transactions which have been provided by the original creditor 02 (UK) Ltd as per your request, showing how the original balance was accrued.

 

We also confirm receipt of your letter dated 19 August 2019 with a request for documents pursuant CPR 31.14 which we believe was addressed in this letter.

 

We have now received the following information from the original creditor 02 (UK) Ltd:

• The last successful payment made was on 6 April 2016 in the sum of £201.63 via credit card.

• The contract was taken out from a retail shop on 23 September 2015.

• The email address used was xxxxxxx which is the email you confirmed on your Defence to be.

• The contact number used for the order was xxxxx which is the contact number confirmed on your Defence to be.

• The bank details registered on the account are as follows: bank account name: Ms A, bank account

Number: **** 2293 and bank sort code: **-*5-80.

 

We confirm that the current balance of £430.61 is made up of the following:

the original balance of £320.01 when the debt was legally assigned to our Client, interest of £25.60 added when the claim was issued, costs of £50.00 and fees of £35.00.

 

Our client is keen to resolve this matter without further legal action, which would involve further costs and fees added to the balance.

 

We would invite you to make any reasonable settlement proposal should you wish to resolve this matter outside of the court.

Please contact our offices within 14 days from the date of this letter should you wish to put forward a settlement proposal.

 

Alternatively, our client has instructed us to offer you a Tomlin Order for the original balance of £320.01.

A Tomlin Order is an agreement between the parties to an instalment amount which can be paid either per week, month or fortnightly.

 

The Tomlin Order will have to be signed by both parties and then sealed by the court to make it binding.

Once sealed, it will place the court proceedings on hold.

 

However, if you default on these payments, a County Court Judgment may be entered against you.

Please note there is a court fee of £100.00 for the Tomlin Order which will be added to the outstanding balance on the account. Please be aware that the total amount payable shall be £420.01 (including costs, fees and interest).

 

Please find enclosed the draft Tomlin Order. If you wish to accept this, please sign, date and return the Tomlin Order within 14 days from the date of this letter.

You can also scan and send it via e-mail to [email protected] if this option is available to you.

 

Should you fail to agree to the above, we reserve the right to produce this letter at any hearing as evidence that costs of attendance could have been avoided.

 

As this is now a litigated matter, you should respond to any court documentation you may receive.

Failure to do so may lead to a County Court Judgment being issued against you.

 

If you need legal advice, you can receive independent legal advice by the Citizens Advice Bureau or a solicitor.

We look forward to hearing from you within 14 days from the date of this letter.

 

Any thoughts are appreciated. KR Escaped.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

std begging letter they send on most of their telecom court claims if you go read like Lowell threads

 

safe to ignore

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

posts moved to your court claim thread 

instead of the credit file default thread you posted on.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its more than a begging letter.....its a very good response which is.... well water tight.... and offer of a Tomlin.They have too much detail on you to wing this this through court on lack of paperwork.....I have just run through your thread again and can't  find any detail of why this debt was incurred or of any dispute. ?

 

Unless you can clarify otherwise I would be seriously considering their offer of a Tomlin Order.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell claimform - old O2 mobile debt

I notice we don't have a copy of the particulars of claim.

 

can you type it out please here..

 

sorry found it..

 

1. Defendant entered in to an agreement ( no date given) under account  number 4346.

2) Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated.

3) agreement was later assigned to the claimant and notice given to the defendant.

4) despite repeated request for payment the sum of £320.01 remains due and outstanding.

The claimant claims

a) said sum of £320.01

b) interest pursuant to s69 CC Act of 1984, 8% pa from date of the assignment to the date of issue, accruing at £0.070 limited to 1 yr being £25.60

c) costs.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

totally removed

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

UPDATE.

Got the SAR back from BT.

BT could not find any information to provide me for the account that Lowell has sued me for.  

I have emailed them now to ask again.

 

Next, I got a Tomlin order requesting I agree to  pay the total amount of  £420.01.

 

I wrote to the court that I did not agree to the order.

The case has been transferred to Central London County court for mediation.

 

I have not spoken with or communicated with Lowell about this outside of the court.

 

What do you advise please?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant offer a Tomlin Order unless a court claim has been issued ?  :???:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

posts again moved to your court claim thread 

instead of the credit file default thread you posted on.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

ho ho ho anyone got a claim Discontinued by Lowell group for Christmas?

 

You advised me to file a defence and ask for mediation.

I followed your advice.

 

I have been waiting for mediation date when I received this notice:

 

Our client has instructed us to discontinue this claim and therefore we enclose a copy of the notice of discontinuance by way of service upon you.  we have filed the same with at court and have requested that any hearing that may have been  listed is vacated. we confirm that this brings the legal proceedings to an end.

 

I called Lowell and asked what they intend to do about the credit reporting  defaults since 2015.

they advised me that they are waiting on the court to send the signed order of discontinuance back.

 

I stated that since they requested the discontinuance the court would sign the order.

there should be no reason for the delay to finalise the remainder of the issues between us. 

 

can you advise me what I can do to get the tradeline removed?

maybe Lowell did not have any documents to support its claims???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats!!! :) - They have every right to report on your CRA if they own the debt.

Just because they discontinue it means nothing to the debt on your CRA.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

only you and the owner can see the calendar section..forget about that.

 

what is the status of the debt in its summary?

is it defaulted ?

should have been by the OC on or before sale.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...