Jump to content


Lowell claimform - old O2 mobile debt *** Claim Discontinued***


Escaped
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1574 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

this is a credit ref term which means the account histroy Lowell supplied to the CRA

any idea why they would discontinue the case?

 

it is defaulted yes on the credit reports.  let me check what else the report says. brb

 

Hi, I challenged the reports.

the only one they report to is TransUnion( call credit) they did not respond, so the information was suppressed. therefore it is not showing up.

I want to be sure it doesn't come back to haunt me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell claimform - old O2 mobile debt **CLAIM DISC'D**
  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

they as in lowells don't report anywhere

they simple follow whatever reporting comes attached to the debt in the line it has in their debt buying portfolio.

pers I wouldn't worry about it

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this correct?

Only I am pursuing Lowell's at the mo, for data protection violation, as advised by Experian?

They say they are the creditor via the assignment, whatever that means.

 

Am I barking up the wrong tree?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Escaped said:

this is a credit ref term which means the account histroy Lowell supplied to the CRA

any idea why they would discontinue the case?

 

Yes, its the same reason most of the claims on this section are discontinued, money.

 

Whilst you can represent yourself in this, the other side have to pay for representation. As is the case over the pond,  Solicitors and Barristers do not come cheap. Your claim, in total would just about cover three quarters of an hour, of a moderately rated Barristers time.  Yes they can apply for costs, but this is small claims and cost awards are limited by statute. 

 

Of course they discontinue, that is especially so, when they find the debtor is going to fight. Even the most vexatious claim needs defending, unless the court steps in.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Lowell claimform - old O2 mobile debt *** Claim Discontinued***

as compared to court claims made for debt covered by the Consumer Credit Act,

 

 - a disproportionate number of Lowell telecom claims here are discontinued.

 

if defended properly, citing unfair contract terms with regards to paying till end of term whereby the service was earlier disconnected, a win is almost now guaranteed.   In fact I don't believe there is one telecom claimform here that has been lost, other than p'haps by judge lottery.

 

don't think monetary value enters into it at all.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Dodgeball said:

Is this correct?

Only I am pursuing Lowell's at the mo, for data protection violation, as advised by Experian?

They say they are the creditor via the assignment, whatever that means.

 

Am I barking up the wrong tree?

 

you yourself have already explained creditor/assignment extensively on a thread you started of the same name and your vanquis thread.

 

I always find it a complete waste of time complaining to the CRA's, always better to hit the nail itself... the OC.

but start a new thread and we'll delve as always.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting comments re discontinue claim. I have another lowell telecon debt but not the claim stage.on credit report. There is not enuf info to challenge the report. I suspect its v similar to this thread. Should i write cra/lowell use disconnect charges to end of agreement to challenge?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Escaped, i have moved some posts from other users, so your thread is purely about this one court claim and the debt in question.  If you have another debt, then please start a new thread in the debt section, if no claim yet issued. 

 

For those who wish to continue a general discussion on mobile contracts, DCA claims and possible unfair contract terms defences, here is a link to a new thread.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/419506-discussion-thread-mobile-contracts-defending-claims-unfair-terms/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Escaped said:

Interesting comments re discontinue claim. I have another lowell telecon debt but not the claim stage.on credit report. There is not enuf info to challenge the report. I suspect its v similar to this thread. Should i write cra/lowell use disconnect charges to end of agreement to challenge?

 

Well I can say, you could do worse, as long as the sum owed is not too large, and you are going to stick to the story, why not.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...