Jump to content


VCS Spycar PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - 'no stopping' - London Southend Airport***Claim Dismissed****** Now VCS asking for Leave To Appeal^^^


Recommended Posts

you don't need exhibits list but each exhibit must have a cover sheet.

 

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Finished and I WON.   The guy who presented VCS couldn't prove the landowner of the land, so the case is dismissed. I was only awarded £ 95 (the maximum) for loss of earnings. Hurry!  

There is so much wrong with their WS.   You stopped for a very short time yet she seems to equate that as being parked! That flies in the face of what parking means.   There h

Total eyewash. Schedule 4 of POFA at section 2 and 3 describes the relevant land and relevant contract where POFA applies. The airport is operated under statutory control. The Byelaws are qu

Posted Images

Add an extra page for my cost of this case: :)

 

EXHIBIT 12 - Defendant’s Schedule of costs

Ordinary Cost

Loss of earnings/leave, incurred through attendance at Count on date to be scheduled - £180

Parking near the court - £8.00

Sub Total - £188.00

Further costs for Claimant's unreasonable behaviour, pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 27.14(2)(g)

Research, preparation and drafting of documents (20 hours at Litigant in Person rate of £19 per hour) - £318

Stationery, printing, photocopying and postage - £24

Sub Total - £342

£ Total Costs Claimed - £530.00

Signed

 

Date:

Edited by WoodDD
Link to post
Share on other sites

A very comprehensive and well researched WS-well done.

 

A couple of small points.

 

Parking Eye have started using DCBL as their debt collector on some sites.

Whether it is at the instruction of PE or DCBL are doing it off their own bat, an extra £60 is being added to PCNs.

 

VCS have history of issuing PCNs for ridiculous reasons at airports in particular where they have no stopping rules. 

We have one on the Forum where a motorist was ticketed for stopping at a zebra crossing.

Another one for being stopped in a queue of traffic.

 

Can you not stop if

a predestrian walks out in front of you; 

a cyclist falls off their bike;

stopping to ask for directions;

mechanical breakdown,

punctured tyre;

there's is an obstruction on the road or

the road is flooded

-the list is endless. 

 

When you receive the WS from VCS look at it carefully as they are not above doctoring evidence.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one at the Zebra Crossing was as a passenger got out whilst pedestrians crossed, the car was parked.  Simple Simon will use any excuse, he would likely invoice a Q plate mobility scooter for driving on the pavement probably if the plate was attached to it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

when is the deadline for exchange

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read it mentioned to be 08/09/2020 somewhere. The court is holding on 06/10/2020.

 

Called my local court, who confirmed I had to submit my WS 2 weeks before the court date.

Edited by WoodDD
Link to post
Share on other sites

hope you recorded the call as the judges orders you posted earlier said 8th sept?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

what date must they serve by?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so a week yet

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I finally received the docs from VCS today (the deadline date). Attached for advice.

 

 

Doc1.pdf

 

Here is my mine sent to court yesterday.

 

Some tips and comments to prepare for face to face in court.

 

Thanks a lot.

 

Defendant Witness Statement.pdf

 

I emailed my WS to VCS through [email protected]
Should I post my WS instead?
Thanks very much!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should not have emailed snail mail, now they can submit any additional stuff last minute.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not when sending stuff to fleecers, is ok to Court, it gives them an avenure to cause you hassle, you might email a follow up stating that you do not accept any legal documents via email then block them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how many times we've said never use email to fleecers

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The email address may not be right one anyway. Am going to post my WS to them :)

 

Can anyone spot some rubbish argument in VCS WS?

 

for example,

 

No public right of way on Section 32 ?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, WoodDD said:

No public right of way on Section 32 ?

 

which is part of the byelaws which simple simon can never enforce. only the airport authority can enforce byelaws. they can't delegate its enforcement either..as breaking any byelaws would be a criminal matter adjudged by a magistrate in a criminal court not a county court civil claims bulk centre.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is so much wrong with their WS.

 

You stopped for a very short time yet she seems to equate that as being parked!

That flies in the face of what parking means.

 

There have been several cases in Court where Judges have defined the meaning of parked.

Not one of them describes it as stopping for a few minutes with the engine running and the driver remaining in the vehicle. And why on earth is POFA being included on s28?

The airport comes under Byelaws and that land is specifically not covered by POFA.

 

Then on s30 she cites Parking Eye v Beavis talking about establishing a contract between the parking company and the motorist to park!

 

then from s33 to s40 they are trying to bamboozle the Court by trying to minimise the effect of the Byelaws.

It is the borough of Southend on Sea that decides the rules there-

https://d1z15fh6odiy9s.cloudfront.net/files/sen-byelaws-1983-297c76b8.

 

S12 and s13 confirm that the signs erected by the Council are the ones to be observed.

 

You can also use the Forum search box and cases that have been won against VCS above.

 

s46 The claimant submits the signs are not prohibitive! 

 

The dictionary description of" Prohibitive"-

(of a law or rule) forbidding or restricting something.  If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck...Is she dumb or what.
s47 Further misdirection-this is nothing to do with parking
s48 refers to the" lawful occupier" not the landowner which is Southend Council. 
I end up going back to s5 which gives the impression that VCS complies totally with their Code of Practice and therefore you, the motorist must be guilty.
yet Time and time again VCS loses in Court because they have not complied with their CoP.
 
The Parking Prankster indicates some of them. 

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2017/02/

 

and in the case below they took someone to Court knowing that they did not have the right to take this person to Court at all.

http://nebula.wsimg.com/e3da92cb966c72de63ec1f98605c2954?AccessKeyId=4CB8F2392A09CF228A46&disposition=0&alloworigin=1

 

VCS v Ms O C8DP9D8C Birmingham 1/8/2017
this was taking a motorist to Court  when the contract for the car park was down to Excel. VCS have lost many cases in Court knowing that they did not have the right to sue as there was no contract between them and motorists-total breach of their CoP and should have put their ability to access motorists data  were it not for the weakness of DVLA and the IPC.

VCS v Ms M. 3QZ53955 25/01/2016 Claim discontinued. Costs awarded to motorist.

as above-masquerading as Excel yet again.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

i hope Yasmeen Couser is going to be at this hearing else their WS is totally inadmissible.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems she has failed to appear before in a no stopping case at Doncaster airport:

 

http://forums.National Consumer Service.com/lofiversion/index.php/t127209.html

 

"To cut the story short the judge dismissed the case as the witness (who wrote their witness statement Yasmeen Couser) was not present of the hearing and after half an hour of explaining to the guy from VCS that they cannot do that the case was dismissed"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The case is confirmed to be held in person at my local court on next Tuesday 06/10.

It's my first time to be in court.

I'm feeling a bit nervous tbh.

 

Any tips would be really appreciated.

Thanks!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andyorch changed the title to VCS Spycar PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - 'no stopping' - London Southend Airport***Claim Dismissed***
  • brassnecked changed the title to VCS Spycar PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - 'no stopping' - London Southend Airport***Claim Dismissed****** Now VCS asking for Leave To Appeal^^^

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...