Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I posted on the facebook group about Hermes queries re: a parcel that Hermes said delivered but i didnt receive. It was a private sale of a mobile phone from a seller in Wales to me in Edinburgh.   The seller has stopped contact with me now so I cant get any help from them. Hermes are saying it was delivered but it wasn't.   I have got all copies of emails to and from the seller and to and from Hermes. A photo of the actual parcel that the seller sent me prior to posting.   There also seems to be a some confusion on the Hermes tracking info about which day it was actually delivered but either way I was in my house both prior and after the delivery.   There was no photo but it stated the driver got a signature. Not true cos it was a covid thing not to get signatures. No calling card to say it was left somewhere else or in a safe place. It just simply wasn't delivered.   I've been told to ask for GPS info in order to trace the delivery or driver. I cant even talk to a human or get a valid address to write to.   I sent an email to the CEO guy and still no reply. I've not reported anything to the police but I'm getting all sorts of contrasting advice to do this and not do that etc that im totally lost now.   If you read this David, please get back to me please. Much appreciated.   This happened in June/july so hope im not too late to still do something about it. It's just took this long to only get to this stage. 
    • PAC code   https://tinyurl.com/yxhxcsxf   ...
    • Noted! Hopefully there won't have to be another time though!     I did respond to the email, I just basically said that he cannot deduct any costs incurred for collecting / picking up the vehicle and if it heads down the route of ADR which is a total new concept of me having any evolvement with, that he would have to pay a refund/the cost of the car and the cost associated with the collection of the vehicle.    Apon further checking the legislation because he gave me no cancellation rights prior to the contract starting he is indeed guilty of an offence, which is the likelihood of what trading standards are dealing with in regards to his local TS contacting him.     
    • hi,     Just asking for some experience or knowledge.     I purchased a puppy on the 30th of august. On numerous occasions I was in contact with breeder and asked if the puppy showed signs of entropion.    I was told no.   On the 26th of August puppy had first jabs. And apparently their vets said none of the litter showed sign of entropion.    On collection of puppy I noticed he was covered in green mucus. The pen had dog muck spread in there so assumed it was just from pups playing and maybe getting it in each others eyes (poor hygeine on breeders part)   Anyways,   Asked breeder to wipe pup and we left       With in 3 hours we realised that the puppy wasn't well. He physically couldn't open his eyes and when we attempted to clean them his eyeballs weren't visible.    We phoned an out of hour vets and contacted the breeders immediately.     The pup was taken to the vets and we were informed he had a severe eye infection which was a result to entropion.    The vet bill came to around 900 after tacking and meds etc. I asked the breeder to cover the costs. They said no because their vets said their was no issues.     The state on this puppy my vets think he's suffered from birth.     And most certainly not 5 minutes before I turned up.      I've filed a small claims for the cost of the vets and the cost of the puppy.      Where do you think ill stand?    What type of evidence will the judge want to see. Thanks
    • A body representing 290 airlines warns it will be 2024 before air traffic reaches pre-pandemic levels. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • Ahmed Alwaheeb's firms sold cars riddled with faults – and which sometimes had government recall notices. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427369-ahmed-alwaheebs-firms-sold-cars-riddled-with-faults-%E2%80%93-and-which-sometimes-had-government-recall-notices/&do=findComment&comment=5071860
      • 3 replies
    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 8 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .

VCS Spycar PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - 'no stopping' - London Southend Airport


Recommended Posts

you don't need exhibits list but each exhibit must have a cover sheet.

 

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 132
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

There is so much wrong with their WS.   You stopped for a very short time yet she seems to equate that as being parked! That flies in the face of what parking means.   There h

you are not filing a witness statement yet so the last bit doenst need to be said, you just sign the thing electronically if using MCOL   Less is more, that way you dont show the level of yo

no need for the bottom sentence. don't goto places you don't need too.   use erics simple short 3 line one.   file by MCOL     

Posted Images

Posted (edited)

Add an extra page for my cost of this case: :)

 

EXHIBIT 12 - Defendant’s Schedule of costs

Ordinary Cost

Loss of earnings/leave, incurred through attendance at Count on date to be scheduled - £180

Parking near the court - £8.00

Sub Total - £188.00

Further costs for Claimant's unreasonable behaviour, pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 27.14(2)(g)

Research, preparation and drafting of documents (20 hours at Litigant in Person rate of £19 per hour) - £318

Stationery, printing, photocopying and postage - £24

Sub Total - £342

£ Total Costs Claimed - £530.00

Signed

 

Date:

Edited by WoodDD
Link to post
Share on other sites

A very comprehensive and well researched WS-well done.

 

A couple of small points.

 

Parking Eye have started using DCBL as their debt collector on some sites.

Whether it is at the instruction of PE or DCBL are doing it off their own bat, an extra £60 is being added to PCNs.

 

VCS have history of issuing PCNs for ridiculous reasons at airports in particular where they have no stopping rules. 

We have one on the Forum where a motorist was ticketed for stopping at a zebra crossing.

Another one for being stopped in a queue of traffic.

 

Can you not stop if

a predestrian walks out in front of you; 

a cyclist falls off their bike;

stopping to ask for directions;

mechanical breakdown,

punctured tyre;

there's is an obstruction on the road or

the road is flooded

-the list is endless. 

 

When you receive the WS from VCS look at it carefully as they are not above doctoring evidence.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one at the Zebra Crossing was as a passenger got out whilst pedestrians crossed, the car was parked.  Simple Simon will use any excuse, he would likely invoice a Q plate mobility scooter for driving on the pavement probably if the plate was attached to it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

when is the deadline for exchange

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read it mentioned to be 08/09/2020 somewhere. The court is holding on 06/10/2020.

 

Called my local court, who confirmed I had to submit my WS 2 weeks before the court date.

Edited by WoodDD
Link to post
Share on other sites

hope you recorded the call as the judges orders you posted earlier said 8th sept?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

what date must they serve by?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so a week yet

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should not have emailed snail mail, now they can submit any additional stuff last minute.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, brassnecked said:

You should not have emailed snail mail, now they can submit any additional stuff last minute.

 

Is email good enough? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not when sending stuff to fleecers, is ok to Court, it gives them an avenure to cause you hassle, you might email a follow up stating that you do not accept any legal documents via email then block them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how many times we've said never use email to fleecers

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, WoodDD said:

No public right of way on Section 32 ?

 

which is part of the byelaws which simple simon can never enforce. only the airport authority can enforce byelaws. they can't delegate its enforcement either..as breaking any byelaws would be a criminal matter adjudged by a magistrate in a criminal court not a county court civil claims bulk centre.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is so much wrong with their WS.

 

You stopped for a very short time yet she seems to equate that as being parked!

That flies in the face of what parking means.

 

There have been several cases in Court where Judges have defined the meaning of parked.

Not one of them describes it as stopping for a few minutes with the engine running and the driver remaining in the vehicle. And why on earth is POFA being included on s28?

The airport comes under Byelaws and that land is specifically not covered by POFA.

 

Then on s30 she cites Parking Eye v Beavis talking about establishing a contract between the parking company and the motorist to park!

 

then from s33 to s40 they are trying to bamboozle the Court by trying to minimise the effect of the Byelaws.

It is the borough of Southend on Sea that decides the rules there-

https://d1z15fh6odiy9s.cloudfront.net/files/sen-byelaws-1983-297c76b8.

 

S12 and s13 confirm that the signs erected by the Council are the ones to be observed.

 

You can also use the Forum search box and cases that have been won against VCS above.

 

s46 The claimant submits the signs are not prohibitive! 

 

The dictionary description of" Prohibitive"-

(of a law or rule) forbidding or restricting something.  If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck...Is she dumb or what.
s47 Further misdirection-this is nothing to do with parking
s48 refers to the" lawful occupier" not the landowner which is Southend Council. 
I end up going back to s5 which gives the impression that VCS complies totally with their Code of Practice and therefore you, the motorist must be guilty.
yet Time and time again VCS loses in Court because they have not complied with their CoP.
 
The Parking Prankster indicates some of them. 

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2017/02/

 

and in the case below they took someone to Court knowing that they did not have the right to take this person to Court at all.

http://nebula.wsimg.com/e3da92cb966c72de63ec1f98605c2954?AccessKeyId=4CB8F2392A09CF228A46&disposition=0&alloworigin=1

 

VCS v Ms O C8DP9D8C Birmingham 1/8/2017
this was taking a motorist to Court  when the contract for the car park was down to Excel. VCS have lost many cases in Court knowing that they did not have the right to sue as there was no contract between them and motorists-total breach of their CoP and should have put their ability to access motorists data  were it not for the weakness of DVLA and the IPC.

VCS v Ms M. 3QZ53955 25/01/2016 Claim discontinued. Costs awarded to motorist.

as above-masquerading as Excel yet again.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...