Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VCS Spycar PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - 'no stopping' - London Southend Airport***Claim Dismissed****** Now VCS asking for Leave To Appeal^^^


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

1st tip is do NOT enter into any little chats their rep wants before you go in

smile and walk away.

 

ensure the writer of the WS in in court to be X examined in person by you.., if not question this with the judge  and politely point out rights of audience i think it is... the WS cannot thus be relied upon at all inc its exhibits.and is all but inadmissible.

 

other than that, only speak when spoken to by the judge, but don't sit there listening to a tissue of lies or fake statements, if you need too speak up.

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't formal like Perry Mason. From what I understand it will be you, the judge and someone representing Simple Simon in a room around a table. [I haven't been to court myself, hopefully someone can add to what I've said.]

 

Do you have your papers organised in a file so you can find things easily when you want to refer to it?

 

HB

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wont get to cross examine anyone..the judge conducts the hearing...he speaks to you he speaks to the claimants representative... which can be in a normal court room or his chambers subject to how busy the court is.

 

If you wish to question validity of the statement and the drafts person not being in attendance....then simply refer to the following.

 

The claimants witness statement confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding that they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act given that they are not in attendance.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perry Mason, Honeybee? My  grandmother used to tell me about him.😀

 

Honeybee is right-it is very informal-no wigs and no hangman's cap.

You refer to the Judge as Sir or Madam and they will be in suits as you should be too, plus wearing a tie.

Do not interrupt the Judge and always be polite to the Judge.

 

If Yasmeen does not appear suggest to the Judge that it would be unfair that their brief is allowed to cross examine you since you have been denied the chance to cross examine her and there were many things that required examination in her WS.

 

Try not to gloat at the end.

Good luck.

 

Do not forget to claim your expenses-time off work, travel, parking and £19 per hour  legal work.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot guys. One more question please:

 

How should I argue this rubbish point from VCS WS?


S38: It is argued that the Byelaws are therefore arbitrary. It is not mandatory that the Byelaws are utilised so long as the relationship is established between the two parties.
 

Byelaws is attached for reference. Thanks a lot!

 

Southend-on-Sea Municipal Airport Byelaws 1983.pdf

Edited by WoodDD
Link to post
Share on other sites

Total eyewash.

Schedule 4 of POFA at section 2 and 3 describes the relevant land and relevant contract where POFA applies. The airport is operated under statutory control.

The Byelaws are quite clear that their rules are the relevant ones.

 

B   Acts for which Permission is Required 

51] No person shall, without the permission of the Airport Director, post, distribute or display signs etc etc

Under "Interpretation" the Airport Authority is Southend Council [this is the second tranche of Byelaws from the Council appearing under the first set of regs] as there are two sets of Interpretation listed.

 

Where Byelaws exist, any fines arising from breaches of the Byelaws go to the Exchequer rather than the airport or the parking company. So to get round this, the crooks are brought in to get round the money going to the Government.

 

Somewhere on the airport a company allows the crooks to set up their system that rakes in a lot more money than the Byelaws can and they do some sort of profit sharing arrangement together. Effectively they are cheating the Exchequer out of money that should have gone to them had any Byelaw been broken.

 

There should be a contract between the crooks and Southend Council.

 

Don't hold your breath looking for that contract.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The case is adjourned as the guy from VCS claimed that they had not received my WS, which I did through post and email. The judge ask me to present my evidence in 7 days. Gutted for VCS's lies.
 

 

It was a mess.

 

I was notified it would be done by phone.

In the last minute the court emailed to join team meeting through video.

The judge who also claimed he had not read my WS either although he admitted the court received it, seriously?

 

The case had been reassigned to a different judge today.

I didn't object it although I had waved my post certificate through my camera. 

What should I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing .....wait for a new date...or you could email them a further copy.....show the court how amicable you are.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

what letter?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

simply do that then and resend it too by email did he say?
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked email from the Claimant.

The guy was a solicitor and claimed he did not have any.

The judge did not have it either.

I'll just send y proof and get them in court there for their unreasonable behaviour. They obviously were lying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you have had it plenty of times and been told to block it...but anyway here it is.

 

PLEASE NOTE: If you have recently received a County Court Summons OR a County Court Judgement (CCJ) relating to Vehicle Control Services Ltd, DO NOT use this contact form to get in touch as it will not be answered, instead email directly to:

 

[email protected]

 

https://vehiclecontrolservices.co.uk/contact/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be sending my draft order, request to strike out the case, updated cost calculation, along with my proof of sending my WS to VCS.

Anything else I should mention in the letter / email to my local court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

I'll be sending my draft order, request to strike out the case, 


On what grounds ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What abuse ? just because they state they have not received your statement and evidence...which may be possible if its gone to the wrong department... and the judge has adjourned to allow you to prove and rectify this allegedly mishap...is not really grounds of abuse on their part....it can and does happen.and unless you convince the court ,which Im sure you can....they could possibly go for a strike out of your defence because you " allegedly " failed to serve your statement and evidence on them by date and therefore didnt fully comply with the court directions.

 

The fee to make application for strike out is £100 without a hearing...and £250 with...which Im sure would require a hearing for that type of application....and the chances of your application being successful would be nil and dismissed by the court.

 

Do as the judge as directed.....bide your time..forget any application with draft orders for something that wont happen.

 

Andy 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fancy doing all that work and then not sending to the court and claimant registered delivery ?

 

cost a fiver but you can print off the date and signature of the person who signed for it at their end.

 

i was advised against email before the hearing as it gave them a chance to prepare a response to my points.

 

good luck but as Andy says you have to work with what you have, which is of course to comply as directed and to appear to be helpful in this regard not kicking back against the process or you are on shaky ground 🤐

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well thats all you need as evidence it was sent...just steer clear of any mad ideas of making application to strike out.....and Im sure you will be fine.

 

 

Andy

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

What fun it is!


The case was heard today via MS Teams.

The representative of VCS kept his lie, saying he still hadn't received my WS even though he acknowledged having received my "certificate of posting" and the screenshot of the original email.

 

I asked the judge to dismiss the case due to the unreasonable behaviour - that was denied.

The judge ordered me to email my WS to the representative on site (which I complied with) and gave the agent 20 minutes to read.

 

The representative read my WS and sent the judge and me two more pieces of evidence (which would be attached).

The judge gave me 15 minutes to read.

 

I read the evidence and stated that I would need more time (for a few hours at least) to do some research on the evidence as a layman of the law. I also mentioned the case is not about the money but the principle as the money was not worth the time I spent on it at all.

 

Finally, the judge criticised the claimant's unreasonable behaviour but refused to dismiss the case.

The judge re-adjourned the case for a later date.

Gutted!

 

Britannia Parking v Semark-Jullien final jmt.pdf VCS v Ward.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder if the judge is after hanging Simple out to dry?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...