Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK Search/SHULMANS LLP PAP LOC - Octopus Energy Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1608 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

 

I was using a utility supplier for 18 months.

Every month, paid my direct debit on time.

 

One day, they reviewed my account and said they had miscalculated my energy consumption and I now owe them £900. 

 

I switched energy suppliers straight away as a consequence. 

 

I am now being contacted by UK Search Limited by phone, email and text message. So far, I haven't responded and don't intend to.

 

I've checked my credit file. The account with the original utility supplier is closed and settled according to Credit Karma. 

 

So what should I do with UK Search Limited? As far as I see it:

 

  • Completely ignore them until they go away (my preferred option)
  • Contact them in some way and dispute the debt

 

I would be very grateful for any advice on how to proceed. I currently have an excellent credit score. 

 

Thank you,

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and Welcome to CAG

 

If we could have the name of the Utility Supplier to be able to place your thread in the correct forum.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to UK Search Limited & Closed Account with Octopus Energy Debt

Thanks I have moved your thread to the  Utilities - Gas, Electricity, Water  Forum and updated your thread title.

 

Please continue to post here to your thread.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

whom are uk searches stated client?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore..

send octopusy an sar.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

loads of DCA util threads here

get reading up.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

@dx100ukI never got a response to my SAR from Octopus.

 

But I have just received a 'letter before court action' from one of their legal representatives, who have been "instructed to consider legal action against [me] if full payment, a settlement or your proposals to make suitable repayments arrangements are not received in the next 30 days."

 

I'm reading the threads now. Any advice on how to proceed? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can instruct my dog to sit

if it does is another matter.

 

it this octo themselves or another co ..who?

 

does it mention the pre action protocol and contain a reply pack?

if not safe to ignore 

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woof woof!

 

It is Shulmans LLP who state "Our client, Octopus Energy Limited have referred your account to their litigation agents UK SEARCH LIMITED who have instructed us to consider legal action..."

 

It does contain a pre-action protocol and reply pack. 

Edited by Topkekker
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to UK Search/SHULMANS LLP PAP LOC - Octopus Energy Debt

aha  SHULMANS LLP not Schulmans LLP that makes more sense now.

 

you need to respond yes.

 

1st if you use our search...

SHULMANS LLP

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/search/?q=SHULMANS LLP

 

you'll see there are numerous claims here for mostly southern water debts

most of which, ince the original creditor know what is going on 

fizzle out one way or another as they don't know this action is going on an they have no real wish to goto court

as they will have to.

 

I would be chasing up octopus and asking where is your sar, they only had 30 days!

 

there is a sticky here:

on how to respond, though I don't think there is a specific one for octo yet...was the electric?

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk thank you. Yes it was an electricity bill.

 

- I put my details into MoneySupermarket for a new supplier.

- I was quoted £30 p/m with Octopus.

- Used them for 13 months and paid everything on time.

- They decided after 13 months they have been undercharging me to the tune of £970.

- Ask them where they got their initial meter reading from as I didn't provide one. They ignore and insist I pay.

- Switched providers and now pay £50 per month on average.

- They release these doubt hounds on me.

 

I'm looking to buy a house in the next few months so really could do with this not going to court.

 

Equally I'm absolutely disgusted with how this company thinks it can treat people. I wonder how a more vulnerable or older person on my situation would feel and it makes my blood boil.

 

 

-

Link to post
Share on other sites

well something is not right, that would make the usage bill £100+ PCM.

 

on the pap reply form we'll inc a request for all bills and readings.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, checklist of what is happening this week:

  • Printing your version of the PAP reply form and sending it to Shulmans LLP. 
    • Ticking box D (I dispute the debt) for the following reasons:
      • I paid in full my pre-agreed direct debits on time, each month, for 13 months. After 13 months had elapsed, Octopus Energy claimed that my usage meant I now owed them £976.93 in arrears. This arrears estimate is erroneous and has no basis in reality, primarily as I did not give Octopus Energy an initial electricity meter reading.To give context to the scale of their obvious error, my home is a one bedroom flat with three rooms.
      • Also, the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation.
    • Ticking box I and request:
      • All bills and meter readings
      • A copy of the Default Notice
      • A copy of the Notice of Assignment

      • A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the debt has accrued detailing:

        • All Transactions.

        • Any additional charges, be them by the original creditor or you Shulmans LLpp, the debt purchaser or any predecessor DCA.

        • Details of all contractual interest added by whom and on what date.

        • List of ALL Payments made toward the Agreement

  • Re-sending the SAR request to Octopus Energy and telling them they are now overdue delivery.

I had also considered doing the following but will hold fire for now (?)

  • Sending a letter to my MP.
  • Sending a letter to the Energy Ombudsman.
  • Sending a letter to the FCA.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

utils bill are not covered by the CCA

they are not a credit agreements

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Posting an update on this. Not sure what my next best move is.

  • I posed the above letters. 
  • Octopus have just emailed me details of my SAR request, including Dropbox links to:
    • Telephone calls, email correspondence, and energy statements.
    • I haven't acknowledged these, or clicked any links, as I sent my initial correspondence by mail and not email.
  • Octopus have said they "cannot exercise your right to be forgotten until the balance is settled"
  • UK Search Limited have started posting letters again, much like the first time, saying they are working on behalf of Octopus Energy to recover...

So it seems like they have restarted the process as it was about 6 months ago.

 

@dx100ukdo I just wait for them to threaten court action again and reply with the same information?

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no harm in downloading all the info whilst it is there.

it cant harm you nor reset anything with regard to ack'in the debt or acknowledgement of one that they claim might exist.

 

as for shul/UK etc.

they have your correct address as you replied to the PAPLOC

 

they are probably wanting free money in preparation for paying for the drinks at the xmas staff office party and you wont be alone in them sending these demands as some mugs might fall for it and wet themselves and blindly cough up.

 

you are safe to ignore.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...