Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paying back student loan in full


Leonaz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1534 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

My situation is similar to many others

- after graduation I left UK and have no intentions to return any time soon, it has been like that for 4 years now.

 

SLC have been contacting me and sending letters to my parents house in my home country, although I do not live there anymore, however I do reside in the same country.

 

Recently I've been getting phone calls from a phone number which as I researched belongs to Transcom Leeds e.g. a debt collection company.

 

The details of me SLC and I assume Transcom have, are my phone number and my email (been ignoring the emails as well), the address they have is my parents address, I do not reside there anymore. I have never made a single re-payment.

 

So my question is

it safe to just keep ignoring them?

 

I see that Transcom does have a branch in my country, but I assume they still have to act under UK law?

Am I facing a possibility to go to court if I keep ignoring them?

Can I go to UK for lets say two weeks holiday and don't worry about them knowing that I am there?

 

Any comments and answers would be very welcome, thank you.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no debt collector has any legal powers - totally ignore they are not bailiffs.

 

when was the last time you deferred?

who are transcoms stated client?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What exactly do you mean by "deferred"? 

At least in the email they sent me it says SLC. So I believe SLC has either sold my debt or hired Transcom to chase after me.

 

One thing that concerns me is - can they pass my data to their local branch of my country and then try to locate me? They have been calling me for the last week every other day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

transcomm are a powerless dca stuff and all any dca can do about any debt they are not bailiffs and have zero legal powers...

even less on debts from a foreign nation...

 

you were supposed to defer your SLC loan every 12mts. from inception..

when was the last time you did so?

 

you can probably access your file via the slc website portal too.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the last time I logged onto the SLC website was a year ago to check the digital versions of the letters they sent to my parents house, but I haven't sent them any details of my current address or employment for which they were asking.

 

In fact I don't think I have ever informed them that I even left the country, it just happened after I graduated, and they just kept sending letters to my old address by default.

 

However since 4 year have passed they probably did realize that I am not residing in the UK anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will gather and didn't earlier, that the slc loan you have is post 1998 so new style not the old style mortgage loan

and is still owned , as they all are by SLC themselves.

 

should you not have been deferring every year as per the rules.??

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said previously I have not gotten into contact with SLC since I graduated, so I would say no, I have not been deferring every year as I haven't sent them a single email or letter with updated employment or residency information. 

Does that somehow allow them to push me into paying?

 

By the way thank you for taking time and answering my questions dx100uk! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

new style student loans  do not become statute barred

 

they exist, and are owed and can increase with non repayment penalties, until you reach 50yrs of age.  

 

all this info is readily available on any interweb search engine and the SLC website. 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you already know that answer...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't that is why I am asking for your help but I'll take that as a definite "no, they can't".

 

By the way, I read a little about statute barred, isn't the time period for it supposed to kick in after a first missed payment?

Since I did not work in the UK after graduation, it should of began right after that?

Even for the new style loans. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

gov't debts cant become statute barred.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, but besides that, if I am not planning to be working in UK, can I have peace of mind by simply ignoring them?

If I ever do have to work in the UK, sure I'll start repaying it then.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe your assumption that not working in the uk resolves you from paying .....no.

residing or staying in the uk, if you ever intend to before you are 50yrs of age could be very problematic.

this could well lead to legal action.

 

ofcourse these debts are not a criminal matter, so present no issues passing through at any passport control at this time.

but with some 250'000 people whom have had their education freely paid for by UK taxpayers and then for want of a better word fleeing to earn money on the back of these qualifications abroad, often earning well above the foreign earning limits requiring repayment which are clearly detailed on the SLC website and STILL not repaying the loans...

 

I can see the gov't upping the anti on recovering the £Billions owed in the near future.

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hello,
 

I decided to pay back my student loan in full or at least in couple larger deposits.

Before I do that I wanted to get the experts opinion on this.

 

First of all I am living overseas and am earning above the minimum threshold.

I calculated that if I paid the standard 9% above the threshold it would work out to a higher amount than the fixed rate for my country, I will probably ask them to put me on a fixed rate and just pay back my loan within a year.

 

What do you think,

should I be doing that or is there any other options you would recommend.

 

Yes the years of paying back will be a bit tough, but it won't be a complete struggle, I just don't want this loan to keep holding me back for the rest of my life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged for history

please keep to one thread

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what year did you graduate please?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I graduated in 2015

 

By the way, the reason I am asking is because I read opinions saying that paying back in full is stupid and should not be done, since student loan is the cheapest possible loan one could have.

 

Regards,
Leo

Link to post
Share on other sites

yours is unlike most we see here and it's a shame to repeat info that is easily understood here:

https://blog.moneysavingexpert.com/2017/05/will-student-loan-written-off/?_ga=2.117811209.1462974349.1572401832-1959362957.1555459058

 

2015 being your issue as I suspect you were past 40 then too.

so you idea of getting shot by paying it off, might not be correct as you've spotted

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So more or less it would be wiped off in 20 years, which means that it surely is better for me to pay it back as soon as possible, since paying fixed rate would just extend the period of payments, thus having to pay more interest.

Would you agree mr Dx?

 

Also what do you mean past 40? I'm in my late 20s at the moment.

 

One more question,

if I agreed a payment schedule with SLC of let's say four large instalments to clear the loan in full.

 

 Are they able to give me sort of a discount for the interest, let's say cut the interest amount in half?

 

I am willing to negotiate with them providing that I will be clearing the loan in a couple years rather than 10 or 20 years, so I'm interested whether they can be flexible in such situation.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's like I was saying , yours is an unusual case, hence I  thought you might have attended uni or WHY late in life whereby age comes into play..  you are in your 20's so no dice there.

 

you would need to read up on if the interest is a FIXED sum from take out, ie it does increase your outstanding balance once signed, regsrdless to the time it takes to settle the loan

or

the interest is monthly on the current outstanding balance so thus your overall repayment total increases as time goes on.

 

that scenario I've never looked at. 

 

if it were the latter, then the quicker its settled, the less it costs you.

if it were the former, I doubt you'd get a discount no.

 

but 

no harm in ringing and asking!!

cant ever hurt you to ASK SLC.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...